Ghid Master Plan Deseuri

8/10/2019 Ghid Master Plan Deseuri

1/32

Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development

GUIDE ON PREPARATION O MASTER P!ANSOR PRO"E#TS IN MUNI#IPA! SO!ID $ASTE MANAGEMENT

A Master Plan (MP) for projects in municipal solid waste management is a strategiclong-term planning tool to help meet future demand (usually 20 or more years) formunicipal solid waste.

%& MP #ONTENTS

A MP typically includes:

. !escription and in"entory of e#isting systems in municipal solid wastemanagement$

2. Population projections% ser"ice area projections% present and planned land

use% projections on collection% transport% treatment and disposal of wasteand future demand on waste treatment and waste disposal capacities$

&. 'aste uantity% composition and waste streamflow projections$

*. +mpro"ements needed to meet local% regional% national and internationaltargets$ prognosis to estimate long-term needs with documentation ofeach option$

,. ustification of selection of particular system impro"ement (ased onneeds% cost effecti"eness% constructaility% reliaility% operation%maintenance% etc)$

/. ecommended system impro"ements$

1. Maps showing impro"ement components and ser"ice areas$

. !ocumentation and description of costs of system impro"ements$

3he MP should e re-e"aluated and updated periodically (at least e"ery fi"e years)to 4eep up with changing system needs and technologies.

'& MP GUIDE

3his guide for preparing MP for projects in municipal solid waste managementproposals that are candidates for financingco-financing from the 56 7ohesion 8und

includes two sections:

A comprehensi"e Index(3ale of 7ontents) of the MP% and

Scope and informationto e included in each chapter of the MP.

3he inde# is primarily ased on the guidelines for de"eloping an +nfrastructure MPfor projects to e financed y 9AM3+! (prepared y alcrow and 7owi ; in May200*% and translated y Mott Mac!onald% 9afege% 6 and =+5 ; in April 200*).'e ha"e modified this inde# ased on the 3? for Master Plan and Macro-affordaility assessment (as per the 3echnical Assistance for project preparation in

the 5n"ironment 9ector% omania @ 200& ? / P PA 0& @ * 'ater and 200& ?/ P PA 0& @ , 'ater). 'e ha"e also included some general and specific planning


2/32

information from "arious regional and local infrastructure de"elopments MP (see7hapter 2).

Most of the data needed for the MP are in the egional 'aste Management Plans('MP) that ha"e een appro"ed y M59!. Please re"iew the 'MP carefully.

'&% MP INDE(

55763+;5 96MMAB

. +>3?!673+?>...................................................................................................&

. Project 8ramewor4.........................................................................................&.2 =eneral =oal and Approach for !e"eloping the MP......................................&.& 9tructure of eport.........................................................................................&

2. A>A3 9+36A3+?>................................................................&

2. Astract..........................................................................................................&2.2 Project Area....................................................................................................&2.& >atural 8eatures............................................................................................&

2.&. 5n"ironment............................................................................................&2.&.2 7limate....................................................................................................&2.&.&


3/32

&. P?573+?>9.....................................................................................................&

&. Astract..........................................................................................................&&.2 Methodology and Assumptions......................................................................&&.& 9ocio-5conomic Projections..........................................................................&

&.&. Macroeconomic 3rends and ?utloo4......................................................&&.&.2 !emographic Projections........................................................................&&.&.& ousehold +ncome Projections...............................................................&&.&.* Projections of 5conomic Acti"ities..........................................................&

&.* 'aste amounts..............................................................................................&&., 'aste composition.........................................................................................&&./ 'aste 8low.....................................................................................................&&.1 7onclusion......................................................................................................&

*. >A3+?>A< ?D573+;59 A>! 7?6>3B 3A=539...........................................&

*. Astract..........................................................................................................&*.2 >ational 'aste Management ?jecti"es.......................................................&*.& 7ross-references with >ational% egional% and other ele"ant 9trategiesand Plans..................................................................................................................&*.* 7ounty 3argets in the 'aste Management 9ector........................................&*., 7onclusion......................................................................................................&

,. ?P3+?> A>A


4/32

., >et Present ;alue..........................................................................................&./ 7onclusion......................................................................................................&

C. A88?!AD+A P 8? P?573 +MP3A3+?>...........................................&

2. A>>559.............................................................................................................&

Master Plan =uidance for 'aste Management , ?ctoer 2001% page *


5/32

'&' S#OPE AND INORMATION OR MP GUIDE

E(E#UTI)E SUMMAR*

3he following information should e included: ?jecti"es and 9cope of the Master Plan

7urrent 9ituation and !eficiencies

Projections

>ational ?jecti"es and 7ounty 3argets

?ption Analysis

7ounty 9trategy


6/32

!e"elop the MP at the county le"el% ta4ing into account all uran and ruralagglomerations in the designated counties.

%&1 Stru,ture of Report

A tale of contents with chapters and a description of the content for each

chapter

Project deli"erales and their distriution

A list of documents ma4ing up the MP

A list Anne#es and description of content

Note: Provide core information in a clear, transparent, and open form, easy tounderstand and to use by the administration. All other information is only needed to

explain and justify the solutions presented.

'& ANA!*SIS O #URRENT SITUATION

Assess the current waste management situation y:

7ollecting local and regional data on all rele"ant waste streams (current state%

age% performance% population ser"ed% waste generated collected% collectionco"erage rate% recycling acti"ities% system for collection and transport% treatmentand e#isting landfill sites% conformity with uality and en"ironmental standards)

Analysing collected data to identify needs and deficiencies esults (asis data for projection% performance indicators and deficiencies)

+nclude the following information:

Pre"ious plans% studies% design reports% and a full picture of the current situation

as well as ac4ground information for the project

?jecti"e re"iew of a"ailale information% and additional measurements% analyses

and sur"eys deemed necessary

As many as possile concrete and credile data% gi"en that the 56 financing

institutions pro"ide financial support ased on reliale information

+nformation sources

'&% Abstra,t

Pro"ide a short summary of all su-chapters including:

Methodology and Assumptions

7onclusions (deficiency and critical issues)

9ummary of all rele"ant ase data rele"ant for projections focusing on (i) 4ey

socio-economic data such as population and industrial trends (ii) waste sources

and streams (iii) waste amount (i") waste composition (") 4ey infrastructure data(indicator tale).

Master Plan =uidance for 'aste Management , ?ctoer 2001% page /


7/32

'&' Pro+e,t Area

Pro"ide an o"er"iew of the project area (7ounty) including:


8/32

ydrology i"ers% la4es% ground water

'&1&4 E,olo0y and sensitive areas

Re2uired data Re2uired details

esources >atural resources li4e forests% farmland% pasturesMineral resources such as metal% salt% gra"elG

>atural ris4s ational economy situation and projection (national and regional =!P growth%

local inflation)

ousehold income and e#penditures considering the a"erage household and the

lowest income deciles 9ocio-economic profile of the county

Master Plan =uidance for 'aste Management , ?ctoer 2001% page


9/32

5mployment and income

5conomic acti"ity and main industrial acti"ities

Analysing the current socio-economic situation should include% ut not e limited to:

7ollect data in the county at minimum for the past fi"e years$

e"iew here the regional% county% and local statistics (e.g.% censuses and

estimations)$

7ollect data on trends inside the county (e.g.% migration trends of population from

rural to uran area) and etween neighouring counties$

7ompare county trends to national trends$

7ollect also information (e#isting studies) on projections for the ne#t decades.

Proposed suchapters:

'&4&% So,io7e,onomi, Profile of Romania


>umer and density of population >umer and density for omania% egion and 7ounty

5"olution of population A"erage e"olution per year per region and 7ounty

6ran and rural population 9hare of rural and uran population per region and 7ounty

!istriution of human settlements >umer of 7ounties% towns% municipalities% communes and"illages

>umer of households

A"erage numer of persons household

Migration (uran and rural population) Migration trend (decrease or increase of uranrural share of

county Main sectors

9hare of agriculture% hea"y industry% tourism% etc.

!e"elopment and trends


10/32

'&5 Assessment of Institutional and !e0al rame-or.

'&5&% General Administrative rame-or.

Driefly descrie the general administrati"e framewor4 in omania at the national%

county% and municipal le"els.

'&5&' !e0al rame-or.

3his chapter gi"es an o"er"iew of the legal framewor4. Pay particular attention to alllegal documents rele"ant to achie"e compliance with national and 56 legislation inthe waste and en"ironmental sector.

Driefly descrie the rele"ant legal framewor4 including:

5uropean legislation in waste sector

ele"ant national en"ironmental legislation


11/32

'&9&' General

Pro"ide an o"er"iew of waste sources and streams (amounts and composition) at

the 7ounty le"el

!escrie organisation of collection and transport at the 7ounty le"el

!escrie share of ser"ed population in uran and in rural areas

!escrie main waste sources and streams (e.g.% domestic waste% domestic-li4e

waste% par4 and garden waste% mar4et waste% ul4y waste)

Pro"ide a map showing all dump sites in uran and rural areas% and e#isting

waste treatment facilities

!escrie prolem areas (e.g.% rural area with difficult access conditions)

'&9&1 Amounts and types of -aste

3he data in this chapter refer to municipal waste% and similar commercial industrial and institutionalwaste% waste from municipal wastewater treatment plants% and construction and demolition waste$they do not refer to waste generated y industrial acti"ities.

Definitions: there is a tendency to use Hgenerated wasteI in lieu of Hcollected wasteI$a"oid this as the terms refer to greatly differing waste amounts% especially when the connection rate islow.

)ollected &aste is generated waste that is collected y sanitation ser"ices (e.g.% household waste thatis collected)

+ncollected &aste is generated waste that is not collected y sanitation ser"ices (e.g.% rural and uran

population that is not ser"ed)

enerated &asteis the sum of collected and uncollected waste (uran and rural)

Assessment of un,olle,ted -aste: the amount of uncollected waste can only eestimated and should e regarded separately. +t depends on the share of the rural and uranpopulation that is ser"ed.

Assessment of quantity of waste uncollected in rural areas

Juantity of waste uncollected in rural areas Knon-ser"ed rural population # a"erage generation inde# in rural areas

+f there are no concrete data% use the a"erage generation inde#es in rural areas that are in the

>ational and egional 'aste Management Plans.

Assessment of quantity of waste uncollected in urban areas

Juantity of waste uncollected in uran areas Knon-ser"ed uran population # a"erage generation inde# in uran areas

+f there are no concrete data% use the a"erage generation inde#es in rural areas that are in the>ational and egional 'aste Management Plans.

Assessment of total quantity of waste generated but uncollected

Juantity of waste generated ut uncollected K uantity uncollected in rural and uran areas

Pro"ide an o"er"iew of waste streams for landfilling dumping on e#isting sites inuran and rural areas with regard to waste amounts and types



12/32

!escrie and uantify waste production y type (including '555-waste and

haFardous waste from households) in the past &-, years (separate for uran andrural areas% see Anne# )

9ewage sludge management

- Driefly assess the current sludge management for each agglomeration

- Assess compliance with national and 56 legislation- Assess impact of current sludge management practices on the en"ironment

in general and on waste management in particular- 9ummarise 4ey critical issues with regard to sludge management

!etermine county-specific waste generation inde# for collected and generated

waste (separately for uran and rural areas in 4ginhaitant # year) and comparewith regional and national data

Collected waste

Generated waste

'&9&3 #omposition of -aste

3wo steps to determine the waste composition of household waste (o"erall% in uran% rural areas% foreach county):

rough assessment y sur"eys and statements of landfill operators and sanitation ser"ices

detailed analysis of waste composition in representati"e sectors of the region (preferred step)

!escrie the composition of waste (e.g.% from analysis or other data sources) in

the past &-, years

-xample for domestic &aste composition'::4 '::5 '::9

$aste,omposition

urban rural $ei0/tedavera0e for

,ounty;

urban Rural $ei0/tedavera0e for

,ounty;

urban Rural $ei0/tedavera0e for

,ounty;

< < < < < < < < :&%7:&' m1?

plasti,@ metal

#ontainers

>3 4 m1?

Euro7,on7tainers

>:&'3 m1?

Euro7,on7tainers

>%&% m1?

-%uipment available to &aste operators for transportin" municipal &aste#ounty Means of transport number Total means of

transport

Type $aste,ompa,tin0

tru,.s

#ontainertru,.s

Tra,tors-it/

trailers

Tilttru,.s

Ot/er Number Total avera0e,apa,ity >m1?

A"erage capacity @ m&

3otal 7ounty

'&=&' Re,y,lin0 and re,overy

!ata on current recyclingreco"ery acti"ities

Master Plan =uidance for 'aste Management , ?ctoer 2001% page &


14/32

!ata on potential mar4et for recyclales from waste (glass% paper% plastic% metal%

wood)$ assess sellale uantities and identify potential customer for suchmaterial

#perators involved in recovery operations and e%uipment used!o,ation Pro+e,ted ,apa,ity

>tons6year?Type of treated

-asteRemar.s

A

D

Total

'&=&1 Treatment of biode0radable -aste

!ata on current treatment acti"ities (composting or MD3)

!ata on potential mar4et for compost$ assess sellale uantities and identify

potential customer for such material

#perators involved in treatment of or"anic &aste M/T or compostin"!!o,ation Pro+e,ted

,apa,itytons6year

Type oftreated-aste

Diverted biode0radable-aste from landfill >tons 6

year?

A

D

Total

'&=&3 E8istin0 landfills

8or e#isting landfills

o 3otal numer

o /a?

Pro+e,ted,apa,ity

>m1?

Storedvolume

>m1?6disposed2uantities >t?

Number ofundeveloped

disposal sites

Urban

Rural


15/32

0uantities of stored &aste and capacities available

#ounty

Buantity of stored -aste#apa,ity available in

'::9>m1?

*ear '::1>t6year?

*ear '::3>t6year?

*ear '::4>t6year?

*ear '::5>t6year?

*ear '::9>t6year?

Total #ounty

'&C Tariffs and ,osts for -aste mana0ement

Pro"ide information on past and current structure and costs in waste

management le"el of tariffs for each waste operator

Analysecompare different tariff systems applied in the 7ounty (and with tariff

systems in other 7ounties)

Eey deficiencies

ecommendations for impro"ement !ata on tariffs and tariff collection


3ariff for population 3ariff person # year

7ollection efficiency for population 9hare of effecti"ely collected tariffs

3ariff for economic agents 3ariff for agents in ?> tons or m&

7ollection efficiency for economicagents

9hare of effecti"ely collected tariffs

+ncome from tariffs 3otal income of county from population and economic agents

total per year

per t collected waste

!ata on costs for waste management


Administrati"e costs 7osts of administrati"e staff

total per year

per ton collected waste

7osts for collection and transport ?perational costs for the main waste sources: staff%maintenance% fuel% amortiFation

total per year

per ton collected waste

3otal costs Administrati"e costs% costs for collection and transport andothers

7omparison of income and costs 3otal costs and total income (tariffs and others)

'&%: Suffi,ien,y of data

7ollect and "erify all data needed for the MP$ if such data are not enough or notreliale (data source is not safe or data are not up to date)% de"elop further

in"estigations or sur"eys.

Master Plan =uidance for 'aste Management , ?ctoer 2001% page ,


16/32

!escrie a"ailaility of data and uality of data

Prepare a tale comparing reuired ase data with a"ailale ase data and

comment on necessary in"estigations

+n"estigation studies should include% ut not e limited to:

- 'aste flows% including sampling and analysis% measurement and recording ofdifferent rele"ant waste streams

- 3opographical sur"eys% including field and hydraulic or engineering sur"eys oftreatment plants and landfill site(s)

- =eo-technical sur"eys% including drilling% foundation studies% and geo-technical studies

- ydrological and hydro-geological sur"eys

'&%% #on,lusions

9ummarise current deficiencies and critical issues

1& PRO"E#TIONS

1&% Abstra,t

9hort summaries of:

Methodology and assumptions

7onclusion on waste amount and waste composition projection

7onclusion on waste flow projection for all rele"ant waste types

1&' Met/odolo0y and Assumptions

!escrie in detail the methodology and assumptions used for the projections in

the chapters elow$

3he source of all pro"ided data shall e traceale (refer to compilations and

detailed calculation of ase data pro"ided in anne#es or e#plain assumptions)

7hec4 ase data for plausiility

1&1 So,io7E,onomi, Pro+e,tions

3he socio-economic assessment at the local and regional le"els will e the asis for:

Affordaility of in"estments

Projections of waste amounts and composition

'aste flow projections

9ludge management projections

9ocio-economic projection should include% ut not e limited% to:

Master Plan =uidance for 'aste Management , ?ctoer 2001% page /


17/32

Macro-economic outloo4 including projection of macroeconomic indicators (i.e.%

economic growth% foreign direct in"estments% inflation% employment rate andsalaries% increase of industrial production)

!emographic projections at national and county le"els ro4en down y rural and

uran areas

Projection on migration trends (e.g.% migration trends from rural to uran areas)

Projection of household +ncome (minimum and a"erage): grossnet household

income% household e#penditures% salaries

Projection of economic acti"ities (industry% commerce% construction% ser"ice

sector) at the county le"el

Prepare projections for the entire planning horiFon of the MP (rea4down per year)ased on the following scenarios:

- Pessimistic

- ?ptimistic

- 5uilirium

Projections should include data on the past &-, years at the eginning of each tale.

Proposed suchapters:

1&1&% Ma,roe,onomi, Trends and Outloo.1&1&' Demo0rap/i, Pro+e,tions1&1&1 ouse/old In,ome Pro+e,tions1&1&3 Pro+e,tions of E,onomi, A,tivities

1&3 $aste amounts

Dased on current data (see 7hapter 2) and results of socio-economic projections(see 7hapter &.&)% project the produced waste amounts% y waste type and for thewhole projected period.

7onsider the national reuirement to increase the collection co"erage rate. 3a4e intoaccount assumptions for increasing or decreasing rates of waste production% definedin the >ational waste management plan and the egional 'aste Management Plans

(as e"olution of waste generation inde# in 4g inhaitant # year% ro4en down yuran and rural areas) and chec4 them with other comparale% e#ternal e#periences.

1&4 $aste ,omposition

Dased on current data (see 7hapter 2) and results of socio-economic projections(see 7hapter &.&)% project the waste composition% ro4en down y waste type(mainly domestic and domestic-li4e waste) and for the whole projected period.Juantify the results (total and 4g inhaitant # year)

!efine and justify assumptions for increasing or decreasing shares of each waste

component% defined in the >ational waste management plan and the egional 'asteManagement Plans% and chec4 them with the current results and with other

Master Plan =uidance for 'aste Management , ?ctoer 2001% page 1


18/32

comparale% e#ternal e#periences. +n particular% consider the pac4aging componentsand the iodegradale fraction in the waste.

1&5 $aste lo-

Dased on current data (see 7hapter 2) and results of socio-economic projections(see 7hapter &.&)% project all rele"ant waste types from all rele"ant waste sources(e.g.% household% institutional% commercial and industrial waste) and parts of waste(e.g.% iodegradale waste% recyclale waste% haFardous waste from households%'555% ul4y waste% sewage sludge) from rural and uran areas to e ale touantify the reuired treatment and disposal capacities.

1&9 #on,lusion

9ummarise the waste amount% composition% and waste flow projection including: 3ale summarising the main data (current situation and planning horiFon)

+nterpretation of results

3& NATIONA! O"E#TI)ES AND #OUNT* TARGETS

3&% Abstra,t

9hort summaries of: Methodology and assumption

7onclusion for projection of waste amount% composition% and waste flows

3&' National $aste Mana0ement Ob+e,tives

9ummarise the rele"ant general en"ironmental ojecti"es% and more specifically thenational waste management ojecti"es% and strategies defined in the (i) Accession3reaty% (ii) 9ector ?perational Program 5n"ironment (9?P 5>;)% ased on therele"ant 56 !irecti"es

Pro"ide an o"er"iew of waste management targets and deadlines in the Accession3reaty (compliance dates for different criteria in each sector).

7omment and conclude on the ao"e mentioned ojecti"es and targets% in particularwith regard to the difficulties e#pected in meeting the compliance deadlines%considering the current situation in 7hapter 2.

3&1 #ross7referen,es -it/ NationalF Re0ionalF and ot/er Relevant Strate0iesand Plans

7omment on rele"ant cross-references etween ojecti"es defined in: 3he waste management sector at the national le"el

3he waste sector (9?P Priority A#is 2) and other sectors (9?P Priority A#is and

& @ /)$ i.e.% cross-reference etween sludge management and waste waterojecti"es



19/32

3he general policies% strategies% and plans at the national le"el (i.e.% >ational

!e"elopment Plan (>!P)% ':%4?Mid7Term

Tar0et

>umer of new or completed integrated wastemanagement systems at county regional le"el

0 &0

Population enefiting from strategic projects for wastemanagement

0 %000%000

>umer of rehailitated old ecological urdens(including old waste landfills

& C0

+n addition to the ojecti"es in the 9?P (compliance with 56 reuirements)% considerthe national targets for collection co"erage% recycling rates for pac4aging waste%di"ersion of iodegradale from landfills and closure of old landfills.

!efine and uantify the target le"el and agree with the eneficiaries of eachcountyregion. 3he waste management targets should refer to indicators such as:ser"ice co"erage% recycling rates% di"ersion rate for iodegradale waste% andnumer of closed landfillsdumpsites.

!e"eloping targets is an iterati"e process and should e seen in relation withstrategy de"elopment and option analysis.

3&4 #on,lusion

7onclude and comments on the ojecti"e and targets defined in this chapter.

4& OPTION ANA!*SIS

3he option analysis should e#plain how to reach the defined targets in the most

cost efficient manner 8urther% it should assess which human settlements (in uran and rural areas)

should e included to reach the defined targets

Master Plan =uidance for 'aste Management , ?ctoer 2001% page C


20/32

3he MP should include components for waste collection and transport% treatment%

recycling and reco"ery% treatment of iodegradale waste (e.g.% composting orMD3)% sanitary landfilling% and closure of old landfillsdumpsites

8or all components% outline and compare "arious technical de"elopment

alternati"es. 3his includes (ut is not limited to) treatment processes and plant

locations% etc.

4&% Abstra,t

4&' Met/odolo0y and Assumptions

!escrie the methodology and assumptions for the option analysis considering thefollowing: !efine criteria for identifying and e"aluating options (cost% en"ironmental ris4s%

health haFards% implementation ris4s% compliance with 56 and national

standards) Population density and concentration of economic acti"ities are the most

important indicator to assess whether central or decentralised solutions will emore cost efficient. efer to the notes in the 3o on human settlements (in uranand rural areas)

7learly define assumptions for unit costs (i.e. costs per person or per ton%

transport% treatment and disposal costs per inhaitant or ton for different humansettlements)% indicating source or calculation ase

+n addition to in"estment and operation cost criteria% consider reliaility of the

technology system and capacity of the entities (e.g.% waste associations) tooperate more comple# systems treatment plants (in particular for rural areas)

Assess the means and costs of treatmentdisposal of sludge to e collected Assess collection% transport% and treatment systems (e.g.% transfer points and

home composting) appropriate for smaller human settlements in rural areas Assess "arious "ariants for collection% treatment% and disposal systems in

comination with other "ariants (different locations% systems e.g.% centralised ordecentralised systems)

7learly indicate on a map and tale the proposed oarders for collection and

transport systems (collection andor transfer Fones). Allocate each locality to oneclearly defined collection andor transfer Fone.

3he results of the option analysis should clearly show the reuired in"estment

costs (and operation costs) to reach the defined targets for each alternati"e.

4&1 Evaluation of Options

Assess the following options: 7entraldecentralised solutions$


21/32

'hen rele"ant% include in the cost comparison of significant options economic

enefits and costs% especially for en"ironmental e#ternalities to justify the leastcost solution(s)

Assess institutional options for "arious Htechnical optionsI

4&3 Proposed Option

Present a summary tale for the assessed options

Propose the preferred option for each of the assessments ao"e

!escrie and comment the selected options

4&4 #on,lusion

Driefly descrie the selected options

5& #OUNT* STRATEG*

3he main purpose of the strategy de"elopment is to identify the least-cost prioritymeasures (technical and institutional solutions) for achie"ing the defined countytargets$ the strategy should summarise:

>ational ojecti"es

7ounty targets and time frame

?ption analysis

and should e ased on theAssessment of the )urrent (ituation(7hapter 2) and theProjections(7hapter &).

A eneral (trate"yshould:

Address the most stringent prolems at the county le"el (i.e. collection co"erage

rate% closure of old dumpsites)

Address specific prolems for particular categories of human settlements (i.e.

ad access to small "illages in rural areas and long transport distances)

Present the selected technological options (i.e.% type of collection and transport

systems for different siFes of human settlements)

Present a schedule for implementing the proposed general measures ased onthe general county strategy and the specific strategies. 3he proposed strategyhas to e in line with the time schedule in the Accession 3reaty (and the


22/32

waste from # 4ginhaitant # year to y 4ginhaitant # year)

- 7onstruct a sorting plant with a capacity of # t year at location G.(mentioning main technical components of the chosen system.

- 7onstruct # ring and drop recycling centres at locationG to collect e.g.'555% haFardous waste from households% other recyclales)

200 @ 202 - 7onstruct new landfill site% compliant to 56 reuirements in & steps (cells)with surface area of # ha% leachate and gas collection and treatment atlocationG.

200 @ 20& - 7lose # landfills dumpsites with a total "olume of # m& in uran areas

- 7lose # landfills dumpsites with a total "olume of # m& in rural areas

200 @ 20, - +ncrease di"ersion rate of iodegradale waste from # 4g inhaitant # yearto y 4g inhaitant # year

- 7onstruct a composting plant with a capacity of # t year at location G.(mentioning main technical components of the chosen system.

'etailed (trate"y: ased on the general strategy% prepare a more 'etailed(trate"y for each component (collection and transport of waste% separatecollection of waste% recycling and reco"ery% waste pre"ention% treatment% disposaland closure of old landfills% sludge treatment and disposal). 3he strategy shouldpro"ide enough details to draft the long term in"estment plan. Juantify andrea4 down y municipality the general targets and measures defined in the=eneral 7ounty 9trategy.

9& !ONG TERM IN)ESTMENT P!AN

9&% Abstra,t

9&' Plannin0 #onte8t

9trategic de"elopment of an integrated waste management system should:

Dring a sustantial contriution to the national commitments (9?P ojecti"es)

7onsider the regionalcounty approach to justify selection of priority in"estments

7onsider omaniaNs rele"ant en"ironmental commitments in the Accession

3reaty$ clearly indicate the deri"ing commitments of the target counties in waste

9oundly justify compliance of the proposed impro"ements with the national 9?Pand other ojecti"es% regional and county waste management plans

!escrie the e#pected contriution of in"estment measures to achie"e the PlansN

ojecti"es

!emonstrate that the in"estment is part of a long-term cost-efficient waste

management de"elopment plan

!emonstrate that the operator(s) is (are) "iale and efficient

!emonstrate that the proposed in"estments are sustainale and offer etter

ser"ices to the pulic andor impro"e en"ironmental protection.

9&1 !on07term Investment Measures



23/32

+dentify the need for in"estments in waste management ser"ices to achie"e full

compliance with rele"ant 57 !irecti"es% ta4ing into account populationaffordaility for in"estments and local andor regional implementation andoperation capacities

+dentify reuirements for 3echnical Assistance to ensure adeuate management

capacity of the eneficiary to implement the measures and sustain thein"estments

ustify each measure y summarising the findings of the current situation (andor

referencing to 7hapter 2) and pro"ide enough supporting data

!escrie each in"estment measure with enough details

!escrie possile options to e assessed in the suseuent feasiility study

+dentify implementation ris4s (i.e. a"ailaility of land)

+dentify operation and maintenance ris4s (i.e. insufficient capacity of eneficiary)

Pro"ide s4etches and drawings with sufficient degree of detail (pre-feasiility

le"el) for each measure

!escrie result of the measures ased on selected indicators (collection

co"erage rate% recycling rate% treatment efficiency% rate for di"ersion ofiodegradale waste from landfills% numer of closed dumpsites and landfills)

9&3 asi, Desi0n Parameters and Pre7dimensionin0

Prepare asic design parameters for the planning horiFon of the MP% ta4ing intoaccount the transition periods agreed for compliance with the rele"ant 56 !irecti"esand the population siFe of the concerned localities.

3he parameters should include (not e#hausti"e list): 3rends for waste amount% composition and source (e.g.% from households% idem

for institutional% commercial and industrial waste% which is similar to householdwaste)

Juality and uantity standards to e met at each target year%

7ollection co"erage rate for all rele"ant waste types (household% institutional%

commercial and industrial waste) and parts of waste (e.g.% iodegradale waste%recyclale waste% haFardous waste from households% '555% ul4y waste%sewage sludge) from rural and uran areas

Mean household income% mean numer of persons per household% discount rates

'aste flows of all rele"ant waste types (household% institutional% commercial and

industrial waste) and parts of waste (e.g. iodegradale waste% recyclale waste%haFardous waste from households% '555% ul4y waste% sewage sludge) fromrural and uran areas

Present in a tale the proposed "alues for the target years with sound justifications.Pay particular attention to the roustness of the assumptions on waste source%amount and composition (current and future le"els% oth domestic and non-domestic). efer to 7hapters &.*-&./ H'aste amount% composition% flowI.

Master Plan =uidance for 'aste Management , ?ctoer 2001% page 2&


24/32

9&4 Unit #osts

Present data from tenders for similar projects in omania and other 5astern

5uropean 7ountries to elaorate a dataase of unit costs for projects in wastemanagement

6se these unit costs @refined or adjusted when necessary@ to estimate total

costs

!escrie thoroughly the asis for unit costs (what is included in the unit cost%

price ase year)

Pro"ide a detailed 6nit 7ost 3ale in the anne# e#pressed in the price ase year

corresponding to the year of sumission of the MP to the client

Pro"ide an aggregated 6nit 7ost 3ale (in"estment cost for collection and

transport% treatment% recycling and reco"ery% disposal and closure of old landfillsper person-eui"alent and per ton collected waste)

9&5 Investment #ost

Pro"ide an in"estment cost tale% ased on the proposed in"estment measures

and the unit cost tale 5#press in"estment cost in the price ase year corresponding to the year of

sumission of the MP to the client 3he tale should e sufficiently detailed for pre-feasiility le"el (separated for

each measure in the rele"ant human settlements in uran and rural areas) Present an aggregated cost tale in real prices

9&9 OperationF Maintenan,e and Administration #osts

Pro"ide a tale for operation and maintenance cost% ased on the proposed

in"estment measures and the unit cost tale

+f e#isting data from waste operators are insufficient or unreliale% use a

normati"e approach% using standard unit costs from waste utilities operatingunder similar conditions

3he tale should e sufficiently detailed for a pre-feasiility le"el (separated for

each measure and each agglomeration)

Present an aggregated cost tale in real prices

9&= Implementation S,/edule and P/asin0 of Measures

9&=&% #riteria for P/asin0

Dased on the strategy de"eloped in 7hapter /% define criteria for preparing animplementation schedule and de"elopment phases. 3he implementation scheduleshould include% ut not e limited to:

!eadlines in the 56 Accession 3reaty

3argets and deadlines in 7hapter * H>ational ?jecti"es and 7ounty 3argetsI

Master Plan =uidance for 'aste Management , ?ctoer 2001% page 2*


25/32

=eneral implementation schedule ased on priorities in 7hapter /

7apacity of eneficiaries (7ountyMunicipalities) to implement the measures

7apacity of the eneficiaries to operate and maintain the facilities

7apacity of the eneficiaries to finance local contriution for the 78 +n"estments

and to finance future rein"estment cost for the facilities +nstitutional capacity (estalishment of associations)

7apacity and willingness of the consumers to pay for the impro"ed ser"ice

(affordaility)

9&=&' Implementation S,/edule and P/asin0 Plan

Prepare an implementation schedule (up to the planning horiFon of the MP) for

the in"estment measures in 7hapter 1.&% indicating start and end date for eachmeasure. Pro"ide also a =antt chart with an o"er"iew of the proposed wor4ing

schedule !iscuss the proposed tentati"e schedule and agree with the eneficiaries (and

M59!)$ organise a wor4shop with all in"ol"ed sta4eholders

!e"elop an aggregated phasing plan ased on the agreed implementation

schedule.

9&C Impa,t of Proposed Measures

Assess the impact (positi"e and negati"e) of the proposed in"estment measures on:

5n"ironment

Pulic health

9ocio-economic en"ironment (i.e.% jo creation)

9&%: A,/ievement of Tar0ets

Present the e#pected output for each phaseof the in"estment plan with the selectedindicators for achie"ing:

9?P 3argets (see 7hapter *)

egional7ounty targets (see 7hapter *)

Present also the related in"estment costs necessary to achie"e the targets in thetale ao"e with the following indicati"e list of indicators:

3otal in"estment costs for each phase

9pecific in"estment costs (i.e. per capita in"estment costs)

Note: The proposed measures have to be in line &ith -+ and $omanian le"alre%uirements and ma1e clear reference to them. The reference points are thedeadlines a"reed for compliance in the Accession Treaty.

9&%% Institutional re2uirements

Master Plan =uidance for 'aste Management , ?ctoer 2001% page 2,


26/32

Present recommended institutional arrangement for the operation of the wastemanagement facilities

9&%' #on,lusion

3he main output of the MP shall e a list of in"estment measures% in order of priorityfor the planning horiFon of the MP. 3he proposed measures should respect thecriteria of affordaility% institutional set-up and financial "iaility.

7onclude on the pre-feasiility of the implementation plan y descriing:

9ummary of phased in"estment measures and costs

9ummary of output and impact of the in"estment measures (4ey indicators)

9ummary tale with compliance dates for each target to reach (e.g. collection

co"erage rate% di"ersion rate of iodegradale waste from landfillsG..)

Potential constraints: (i) economic% (ii) technical% (iii) en"ironmental% (i")

institutional$ (") time

Main assumptions and conditions rele"ant for implementing the measures

3he assessment of the pre-feasiility will help identify any shortcomings (institutional%financial% technical% etc.) at an early stage of project de"elopment.

=& INAN#IA! AND E#ONOMI# ANA!*SIS

At this stage of MP de"elopment% the financial and economic analysis mainly aims at

de"eloping the necessary input data for the affordaility assessment and preparing: ?"erall in"estment and rein"estment cost of the proposed measures o"er the

defined e"aluation period$

?"erall ?M cost as reuired for (i) sustainale operation and maintenance of

the proposed waste management system (separate for collection and transport%treatment% disposal and closure of old landfills)% and (ii) meet e#pected ser"icestandards and (iii) the full technical lifetimes of the in"estment under thepre"ailing conditions (estimated and projected on an annual asis for theplanning horiFon of the MP)

3he 8easiility 9tudy will de"elop a more detailed 8inancial and 5conomic analysis.

=&% Abstra,t

=&' Assumptions


27/32

De ased on the net in"estment cost tales presented in 7hapter 1./. (net of

contingencies% engineering and design costs)

+nclude costs for contingencies (0L)% technical assistance for construction

super"ision (,L)% final design (,L)

De e#pressed in current prices ta4ing as ase year the year of sumission of theMP to the client

=&3 Operation and Maintenan,e #osts

?M costs (rea4down per year) should e ased on:

8inancial assessment of e#isting waste operators as descried in 7hapter 2.C

HAnalysis of 7urrent 9ituation costs and tariffsI

Projections prepared in 7hapter &

7osts defined in 7hapter 1.1 H?peration% Maintenance and Administration 7ostsI

De e#pressed in current prices ta4ing as ase year the year of sumission of the

MP to the client

=&4 Net Present )alue

Prepare a preliminary estimate of the >et Present ;alue of the o"erall in"estments(ro4en down according to collection and transport% treatment and recycling%disposal% and closure of old landfills) for each agglomeration ased on the followingassumptions:

ein"estment after , years of components with limited useful lifetime

(machinery and euipment) and &0 years for ci"il wor4s and pipe wor4s$

!iscount rate of ,L

!e"elop the A"erage +ncremental 7ost (A+7: discounted cash-flow of the systemo"er the period of the project di"ided y the flow of en"ironmental resourcesconsumed or treated during the period) of the projected in"estment and ?M costsas pro#y of the a"erage tariff needed to co"er the in"estment andor ?M portion ofthe cost of the o"erall in"estment in the project area

=&5 #on,lusion

C& AORDAI!IT* ANA!*SIS

5stimate the potential contriution capacity of different groups of consumers toin"estments and operation of waste ser"ices y:

7omparing the ma#imum potential contriution capacity of the eneficiary

community and the total in"estment programme costs% minus all a"ailale grants

!e"eloping a mathematical model (spreadsheet) to calculate the affordaility for

"arious in"estment programmes% oth changing the amount and phasing of thein"estments and other related costs. 3he model should distinguish etween



28/32

different siFes of human settlements (i.e. HsmallerIrural$ HiggerI uranagglomerations) and different waste source categories (i.e. domestic% non-domestic)

7onsidering the total in"estments proposed for the planning horiFon of the MP

6sing A+7s as pro#y of a"erage tariffs% differentiated for each agglomeration and

comparing with current waste tariffs highlighted in 7hapter 2.C

5stimating the ma#imum potential contriution capacity of the eneficiary

community on the asis that the a"erage monthly e#penditure for waste shouldnot e#ceed .,L of the a"erage monthly household income of the lowest incomedecile (for resident population)% during all the period of analysis

Proposed su-chapters:

C&% Abstra,t

C&' Met/odolo0y and Approa,/

C&1 Assumptions

C&3 Tariffs

C&4 Affordability

C&5 Sensitivity Analysis

C&9 #on,lusion

%:& PRIORIT* INRASTRU#TURE IN)ESTMENT PROGRAMME

3he waste management system proposed for 56 co-financing will e the first

stage of a long-term phased in"estment programme designed to fully comply withthe rele"ant 57 !irecti"es$

3his first stage will include the priority measures with a positi"e impact on uality

and uantity of the pro"ided ser"ices and on en"ironmental protection% and will

represent the project to e co- financed y 56 7ohesion 8unds 3he in"estment programme will ta4e into account:

- 3ransition periods for the rele"ant !irecti"es- Affordaility of the proposed in"estment for population-


29/32

%:&% Abstra,t

%:&' Prioritisation of Pro+e,t Measures

%:&'&% #riteria

8urther% integrated projects considering all rele"ant sections in waste management(collection and transport% sorting and recycling% iological waste treatment% sanitarylandfilling and closure of old landfills) should e gi"en priority.

9elect priority measures in two steps:

. All oligatory measures necessary to e implemented to comply with 56 Acuisand national laws

2. All non-oligatory measures (all measures impro"ing the ser"ice le"el) ased on

a ran4ing of cost enefit ratio.

5#plain the selected criteria clearly and use a rational and simple ran4ing system.3he prioritisation system should include weights defined y the eneficiaries.

8ull compliance (according to the deadlines in the Accession 3reaty) should eachie"ed within the project period (Phase @ Priority Phase) for a prioritisedagglomeration. 3hus% it is not acceptale to shift part of the in"estments (necessaryto achie"e compliance) within one agglomeration to a suseuent phase (Phase ++).

8urther% prioritise projects considering the entire waste cycle (collection andtransport% sorting and recycling% iological waste treatment% sanitary landfilling% andclosure of old landfills).

%:&'&' Results

!escrie the results of the prioritisation process for each component (collection andtransport% sorting and recycling% iological waste treatment% sanitary landfilling andclosure of old landfills).

%:&1 ey Performan,e Indi,ators

Present the enefit of the project with selected output indicators for achie"ing: 9?P 3argets (see 7hapter *)

egional7ounty targets (see 7hapter *)

?ther systems performance indicators and ratio (i.e. in"estment cost per

population etc.)5nsure that the proposed measures will ha"e a significant impact on the definedtargets.

%:&3 !ist of Prioritised Investment Measures

Prepare a list of priority measures including: +n"estment component numer

Master Plan =uidance for 'aste Management , ?ctoer 2001% page 2C


30/32

>ame of agglomeration

!escription of measure (incl. dimensioning% location% etc.)

Population ser"ed with 56 acuis compliant systems

ustification of in"estment

+mplementation period

+n"estment costs

A tale should also summarise: 7apital reuirements for the priority phase

A first recommendation for financing capital in"estments (56 grant

78Deneficiary9tate and


31/32

Anne# D: esults of Analytical 9ludge +n"estigationsAnne# D2:


32/32

Anne8 %H 5"olution of waste uantitiesMain waste types 'aste

code3otal county 6ran

areauralarea

3otalcounty

6ranarea

uralarea

GG

200, 200/ 2001

>t? >t? >t? >t? >t? >t? >t?

%&: Muni,ipal -aste& as-ell as similar ,om7mer,ial& industrial andinstitutional -aste& outof -/i,/H

':

. 6nsorted householdwaste

20 0& 0

.2 9imilar unsorted com-mercial. industrial andinstitutional waste

20 0& 0

.& Municipal and similarwaste collected sepa-

rately (e#cept construc-tion and demolitionwaste). out of which:

20 0

Paper and cardoard 20 0 0

, 0 0

=lass 20 0 02

, 0 01

Plastic 20 0 &C

, 0 02

Metals 20 0 *0

'ood 20 0 &

, 0 0&iodegradale waste 20 0 0

?thers 20 0

, 0

.* Dul4y waste 20 0& 01

., =arden and par4 waste 20 02

./ Mar4etplace waste 20 0& 02

.1 9treet waste 20 0& 0&

2.0 Slud0e from -aste-ater treatment

plants& out of -/i,/H

%C := :4

2. Juantity reco"ered (drymatter.)

C 0 0,

2.2 Juantity stored (drymatter)O

C 0 0,

&.0 #onstru,tion anddemolition -aste& outof:

%9

&. +nert waste

&.2 Mi#ed waste

Total waste collected

Ghid Master Plan Deseuri

Documents

Transcript of Ghid Master Plan Deseuri