Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu

8/7/2019 Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu

1/19

coala Naional de Studii Politice i Administrative

Argumentation Theory

-Final Paper-

Andreea Gospodariu

Master Comunicare i Publicitate cu predare n limba englez

5

10

15


2/19

I. Introduction

I chose as object of my analysis an advertorial that appeared in the May 1962 issue of

Mechanix Illustrated, an American magazine founded in the first half of the 20th century. It

presents the story of a journalist who decides to follow the fastest way to grow hair and tries

out a skull falsie. After he tells his editor that hes curious about Tashays (this was the name of

the hair pieces), he gets a reply that motivates him to write the advertorial that I am about to

analyze (annex 1).

I chose this in spite of all the other advertorials because its almost 50 years old and I was

really curious if it would be so much different from the ones we can see nowadays. I also chose

this, and not one of the other advertorials presented in the magazines site, as I thought this

subject is funny and outdated now, because there are other ways to resolve the baldness issue,

but at the time, it was rather controversial.

Throughout the paper, I will establish the standpoints and substandpoints at stake in the

text, I will discuss and exemplify the dialectical stages present in the advertorial. I will also

formulate the main arguments which the author puts forward for his standpoint and I will

identify and analyze the argumentation schemes and how strategic maneuvering occurs in the

text, as well as the role of pictures in the advertorial. In the last page I will try to identify the

violations of the ten rules of the critical discussion, and analyze the fallacies present in the

advertorial.

I found the strategy of starting off the discourse by being rather skeptical, becoming more

and more enthusiastic and finishing it in a positive note that stated that choosing the Tashays is

the best solution for the bald people, a really good one because faking empathy is, in my opinion,

one of the most important features of an advertisement or advertorial.

2

20

25

30

35

40


3/19

II. Analysis

I start off with the idea that at the time, most of the people considered wearing a toupee

tasteless, as it looked fake and unnatural. Given this, they may be seen as the antagonists that

oppose to the ones that originally developed and wore the toupee, and the writer is, at first, on

the antagonists side, but as we keep on reading, he switches teams and starts bringing pro

arguments in wearing it. So, in this advertorial, the readers of the magazine are the antagonists

and the author starts out by agreeing with them, but changes his standpoint and becomes the

protagonist.

The text is part of a retrogressive presentation, as the standpoint precedes the

argumentation (EEemeren, 2002, p. 37). Also, the argumentation is based on the power of

example, as the author uses his own experience as an argument. The main standpoint in the text

is that There is only one cure for baldness and that is the toupee(1). From the authors point of

view, this means two things that also become implicit premises: baldness is a disease (in a

pejorative sense) and it must be cured so bald people must always hide their lack of hair and

hope that no one will notice that they are wearing a some kind of wig. Another standpoint is that

the mystery and jokes about the toupees have come to an end with the argument that the idea that

toupees are bad has changed (3) [because] a man named Louis Feder has made them

absolutely undetectable and non-skid [and] has won for them a wide social acceptance (3-5).

There are no other explicit standpoints or arguments in the text, there are only experiences meant

to appeal to the emotional part of the audience. But it is implicit that the audience (the

antagonist) thinks toupees are fake, ugly and a subject of joke, while the writer (seen as the

protagonist) has a common standpoint at first but starts to change it (through the experience oftrying out a Tashay) and ends up believing that toupees are a good idea and that they can look

natural.

The argument a man named Louis Feder has made them absolutely undetectable and

non-skid [and] has won for them a wide social acceptance (3-5) becomes a standpoint with

3

45

50

55

60

65

70

5


4/19

several arguments that are implicit, in the form of the authors stories about experience with the

Tashay. This is a coordinative argumentation, as the arguments must be taken together to

constitute a conclusive defense (Eemeren, 2002, p. 65). The arguments are dependent on each

other for the defense of the standpoint because each argument by itself is too weak to

conclusively support the standpoint (Eemeren, 2002, p. 65).

Therefore, a man named Louis Feder has made them absolutely undetectable and non-

skid [and] has won for them a wide social acceptance:

-because toupees are made from natural hair bought from live peasant women- because

the hair of most women is unsuitable- because it has been dyed or permanently waved (22-24)

argumentation based on a causal relation

-because Tashays are made from several colors of hair as do most human heads (25-28)

-because you can choose the cut-out (43)

-because Feders craftsmen can crochet 750-1,000 hairs into one square inch of hairpiece

as there are 1,000 hairs per square inch in a full natural head of hair (52-53)

- because the stitches used give the hair a bristly, natural, upstanding look (54-55)

-because they can cut, trim and apply double-faced adhesive (57-58)

-because they barber the hairpiece to your natural hair (58-59)

-because you can swim in a Tashay (66)

-because you can drive in an open convertible with no harmful results (66-67)

-because even you can forget that you are wearing it (68)

-because good old average Joe Bloewe can hold his head high secure in the knowledge

that his Tashay will stay up there without betraying him (so even average men are not betrayed

by this particulary toupee) (80-81)

The first dialectical stage, the confrontation, is present in the first 7 lines of the

advertorial, where the difference of opinion starts to become more obvious and the two parts

4

75

80

85

90

95


5/19

silently establish that there is a difference of opinion: the author changed his mind throughout the

investigation of the Tashays, while the audience still thinks toupees are a really bad idea.

In the opening stage (8-10) the author decides to bring proof and justify his action (of

changing his mind) by testing out the Tashay himself.

He makes an appointment to personally see Louis Feder, the father of the Tashays and

share his experience with the audience, and this is the start of the argumentation stage (11-70). In

my opinion the concluding stage is the part where the author starts writing about how to take

proper care of a toupee and stating the prices (71-81). The last 5 lines are the ultimate try to

convince the audience that toupees are actually great through an attempt using Joe Bloewe, a

name used to refer to a man whose name is not known or whose normality is being emphasized.

The author tries to demonstrate that his views reflect those of the common person. The

concluding stage is another weak point of this advertorial, due to the fact that the argumentation

was pretty weak as well. Because his arguments were subjective, a subjective and weak

conclusion follows and it is only deducted: the Tashays look very much like the real hair, they

are well made and fitted and they can stay on the head for a very long time. It is not a very

powerful conclusion and cannot answer any of the possible questions of the audience like: Was

it worth the money in the long run?, Was it obvious that you were wearing a toupee?, Did it

make you feel different? How? or Did it look natural on your head?.

The argumentation stage is actually the biggest part of the advertorial, as the author

explains in a very detailed manner how he perceived the experience from being received by the

people working at the toupee store and how they managed to help him get past his anxiety, the

way they explained step by step the process of toupee-making, and how they managed to realize

his own Tashay. In my opinion it would have been a better approach if he presented

convincing arguments to support his standpoint, not only to tell the story in detail, but to show

some positive reactions to his improved new look, or how people perceived him as being

younger, better looking, more confident etc. Sticking to his own opinion, clearly affected bysubjectiveness, makes his argumentation scheme a weak one.

The images used in this advertorial talk for themselves, as the first picture shows a bald,

sad man, while the second presents the same man with a toupee, smiling (annex 3). The images

also have a description below them:

5

100

105

110

115

120

125

10


6/19

-the first with the bald man SAD AND PENSIVE client of the House of Fender before

being fitted with his Tashay

-the second with the same man, but with a toupee JOLLY, CONFIDENT client

wearing Tashay. Friends soon forget you ever were denuded.

The images along with the description are not a very subtle suggestion that bald men will

be happier using a Tashay, therefore reinforcing the authors arguments.

Some critical questions that could appear are: Is the case mentioned as example indeed

representative? and Is the case sufficient to justify the generalization?. As I said before, the

argumentation scheme is not very powerful as it is sentenced to a subjective interpretation the

authors. To successfully sell a product one must use testimonials from a number of people,

positive reactions to the product or any other outcomes the buyer would have from it. So the case

mentioned in the advertorial is not representative, nor sufficient to justify the generalisation or to

support the purpose of the text itself to increase the sales of Tashays. Even if the people

working at the toupee store were very helpful and the toupee itself is a great product, the

advertorial presents only a day in the life of the toupee-buyer, and a not very important one the

day when his Tashay is made and very few details from the future experience of wearing it,

while the important part, the feed-back one gets from people, is clearly ignored by the author

What the author clearly lacks is powerful evidence: he narrates the story adding up his own

opinion about the product, opinion which is definitely subjective, so the arguments dont carryany weight as they are not supported by an objective view or at least someone elses subjective

view. The text sells readers to advertisers, but not customers to Louis Feder, the owner of the

toupee-store (Slade, 2002, p. 1).

The toupees are clearly a high involvement product and advertisements for high

involvement products may require the target audience to reason, the reasoning is only part of the

message, and affective components (the feel), are equally important (Slade, 2002, p. 1). Here,

the reasoning part as well as the affective components are ignored. The affective component

would have been achieved if the author told a story about how the toupee made him feel in some

relevant situation of if the presented some reactions from friends or family. The reasoning part

would have also been emphasised by some stories about how his baldness affects his everyday

life. These components are merely presented in the two pictures from the beginning of the

advertorial, but they should have been developed as a more detailed story.

6

130

135

140

145

150

155


7/19

According to Kress and van Leeuwens textual metafunction as the

meaning of compositional elements of the image (Slade, 2003, p. 3, annex

4), the appearance of the text and the pictures is a not very correct one as in

the upper left part should be the Ideal Given and in the upper right the Ideal

New (Slade, 2003, p. 3). We can notice in the magazine that in the upper left

is the picture with the bald man, while in the upper right the one with the

same man wearing a toupee. The context, though, is not necessarily a

proper one for using this theory, as this is a magazine, not a printed

advertorial by itself, and the arrangement follows the logic scheme of

moving our eyes forward, or to the right part of the page. Also, the picture

itself shows the man from his chest up and the reader may sense some kind

of physical or metaphorical approach to the person in the picture, and this

may try to fill up the need for the affective component of the advertorial.

Advertisements are the prime example of visual argumentation precisely

because they are conventionally read as persuasive images (Slade, 2003,

p.4) but even if the pictures could have a powerful effect on the reader, we

cannot use the images as being arguments, at least not without a real

written argument to support them, as Fleming (1996) says that if all

argumentation is by definition verbal confrontation, then evidently non verbal confrontation is

not argumentation (Slade, 2003, p. 4).

Regarding the strategic maneuvering in the confrontation stage, it aims for the most

effective choice among the potential issues for discussion, restricting the disagreement space in

such a way that the confrontation concentrates on the subject or the points the speaker or writer

finds easiest to handle (Eemeren, 2000, p. 6). In this case, the issue of discussion becomes the

toupee, as it is easy for the writer to approach this subject because he experienced the feeling.

In the opening stage, strategic maneuvering aims to creating the most advantageous starting

point, for instance by calling to mind or by eliciting helpful concessions from the other

party (Eemeren, 2000, p. 6). In this advertorial the starting point is the idea of trying out a

toupee and deciding to narrate the experience: Like many bald men, I had long toyed with the

idea of trying out a skull falsie and one day while talking with MI editor Bill Parker, I mentioned

this secret thought. His reaction was, Well, Bob, why dont you look into the matter and give us

7

160

165

170

175

180

185


8/19

a report? So, here it is..In the argumentation stage, the speaker or writer can, starting from

the list of status issues associated with the type of standpoint at issue, choose strategic lines of

defence or attack that involve selecting from the available loci those that suit him or her best

(Eemeren, 2000, p. 6). The strategy here is presenting the arguments as experiences with the

toupee, explaining in detail the whole story, from the authors visit to the headman of the

business, to the rather short positive personal feed-back about the Tashay. Regarding the

concluding stage, in theory all efforts must be directed toward achieving the result of the

discourse desired, for instance, by pointing out the consequences of accepting a certain complex

of arguments (Eemeren, 2000, p. 6), but in the advertorial, this never happens. The author does

not tell the readers how felt about his purchase, if he got positive feed-back from other people, if

he was perceived in another way due to the fact that he was hairless no more, if the toupee was

useful in any way or even if it was a good experience in the long run.

Returning to the power of the arguments, they should be as persuasive as possible its

rhetorical moves must, at all dialectical stages of the discourse, be adapted to the audience

demand (Eemeren, p. 163) meaning that they must create a certain amount of empathy or

communion between the arguer and his audience (Eemeren, 2000, p. 6). In this case, the

empathy is totally missing as the authors stories regard the product itself and not the users

feelings and gratifications. The author does not even try to enhance the status of personal

feelings and impressions to that of widely shared value judgements and the status of subjectivevalues to that of facts(Eemeren, 2000, p. 6), mainly because he does not share any personal

feelings about the product or stimulate fraternization more that what we would expect a seller

to do. In the following lines of the text we find the author using prolepsis the figure of

anticipating and clearing away objections (Eemeren, 2000, p. 7): Long the butt of jokes and

scornful remarks, there was once a plain brown envelope sort of mystery surrounding the

making, selling, buying and wearing of cranium cozies but all that has been changed. A man

named Louis Federhas made them absolutely undetectable and non-skid. Most important of all,

perhaps, he has won for them a wide social acceptance. The author tries to anticipate some of

the audiences arguments against the toupee (the users of the toupees are an easy target for jokes,

people can tell when youre wearing a toupee, you are not socially accepted if you wear a toupee,

it is tasteless to wear such a thing etc) and to clear them away with some remarks that are not

sustained in any way throughout the written material.

8

190

195

200

205

210

215

220

15


9/19

Regarding the violations of the ten rules of critical discussion, there is just one thing to

discuss. I believe that in this advertorial there is a violation of the Rule 8 regarding the validity

denying the antecedent. The mistake made in this case is that a sufficient condition is treated as a

necessary condition (Eemeren, 2002, p. 133). The author starts the article from the rather

unexpressed premise that toupees that are made from artificial hair will always look fake.

Afterwards he affirms that the Tashays are made from natural hair from live peasant women,

therefore the result is that Tashays must look real because they are made from real hair.

If a toupee is made from artificial hair (antecendent) it looks fake. (consequent)

Tashays are made from natural, real hair. (denial of the antecedent)

Therefore: Tashays dont look fake. They look real.

III. Conclusion

This advertorial has a very weak concluding stage that is so important in advertising,

because the argumentation was weak as well. It was also too long, with no evident traces of

arguments. As I said, it would have been a better approach for the writer to present convincing

arguments to support his standpoint, not only to narrate the story of how he got his toupee done

in 2 weeks by a bunch of great people. He should have shown some positive reactions to his new

look or some feedback from other people and how they perceived him as being handsome,

younger or more confident. The text looked promising at the beginning, but after a further

reading and a closer look, it became more and more obvious that it was just a long story with no

happy ending. Even being so long, and losing the audience at the half of the advertorial, many of

the readers may have tried to read the end of it, maybe out of curiosity, to see the aftermath, the

conclusions and what the author gained from buying the Tashay, and found some not very

convincing facts and no trace of strong evidence that they should try out another toupee. People

who were afraid of wearing a toupee because of other peoples reactions, would look for reasons

9

225

230

235

240

245

250


10/19

not to be afraid anymore, but they only found some weak arguments dressed in a long story, as

there were no opinions at all about the product or the experience.

There is another thing important here, the first sentence of the article There is only one

positive cure for baldness and that is the toupee, that even made me, as a non-bald girl to feel a

little offended. This means that the author states that baldness is a disease that must necessary be

cured. Yes, it is the advertising industries role to create new needs in our minds in order to sell

more and more types of products, but not by offending people.

In conclusion, I believe that this advertorial may have done its job at the time, but today

this piece of material would not get the chance to be published because of its lack of

effectiveness.

References:

10

255

260

265

270

275

280

20


11/19

1. Eemeren, Frans, H., van, Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, A.F. (2002).

Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Associates.

2. Slade, Christina. (2002). Reasons to Buy: The Logic of Advertisements. Canberra:

University of Canberra, ACT 2600.

3. Slade, Christina. (2003). Seeing Reasons: Visual Argumentation in Advertisements.

Canberra: University of Canberra, ACT 2601.

4. Eemeren, Frans, H., van, Houtlosser, Peter. (2000) Rhetorical Analysis Within a

Pragma-Dialectical Framework. The Case of R. J. Reynolds. Amsterdam: University of

Amsterdam.

5. Eemeren, Frans, H., van, Houtlosser, Peter. Argumentation in Practice.

Source:http://books.google.ro/books?id=SaOfcsyWudAC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=Atkin+

%26+Richardson+argumentative&source=bl&ots=XBtm0GsqM6&sig=yaA8NgdlvsZ5mQ6i

eOzhmRm219E&hl=ro&ei=EyBLTa_2Ao6SOvib8d8P&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&r

esnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Atkin%20%26%20Richardson

%20argumentative&f=false available at 28th of January 2011

Source for the advertorial: http://blog.modernmechanix.com/issue/?

magname=MechanixIllustrated&magdate=7-1966

Annex 1

11

285

290

295

300

305

310
http://books.google.ro/books?id=SaOfcsyWudAC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=Atkin+%26+Richardson+argumentative&source=bl&ots=XBtm0GsqM6&sig=yaA8NgdlvsZ5mQ6ieOzhmRm219E&hl=ro&ei=EyBLTa_2Ao6SOvib8d8P&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Atkin%20%26%20Richardson%20argumentative&f=falsehttp://books.google.ro/books?id=SaOfcsyWudAC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=Atkin+%26+Richardson+argumentative&source=bl&ots=XBtm0GsqM6&sig=yaA8NgdlvsZ5mQ6ieOzhmRm219E&hl=ro&ei=EyBLTa_2Ao6SOvib8d8P&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Atkin%20%26%20Richardson%20argumentative&f=falsehttp://books.google.ro/books?id=SaOfcsyWudAC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=Atkin+%26+Richardson+argumentative&source=bl&ots=XBtm0GsqM6&sig=yaA8NgdlvsZ5mQ6ieOzhmRm219E&hl=ro&ei=EyBLTa_2Ao6SOvib8d8P&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Atkin%20%26%20Richardson%20argumentative&f=falsehttp://books.google.ro/books?id=SaOfcsyWudAC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=Atkin+%26+Richardson+argumentative&source=bl&ots=XBtm0GsqM6&sig=yaA8NgdlvsZ5mQ6ieOzhmRm219E&hl=ro&ei=EyBLTa_2Ao6SOvib8d8P&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Atkin%20%26%20Richardson%20argumentative&f=falsehttp://books.google.ro/books?id=SaOfcsyWudAC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=Atkin+%26+Richardson+argumentative&source=bl&ots=XBtm0GsqM6&sig=yaA8NgdlvsZ5mQ6ieOzhmRm219E&hl=ro&ei=EyBLTa_2Ao6SOvib8d8P&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Atkin%20%26%20Richardson%20argumentative&f=falsehttp://books.google.ro/books?id=SaOfcsyWudAC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=Atkin+%26+Richardson+argumentative&source=bl&ots=XBtm0GsqM6&sig=yaA8NgdlvsZ5mQ6ieOzhmRm219E&hl=ro&ei=EyBLTa_2Ao6SOvib8d8P&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Atkin%20%26%20Richardson%20argumentative&f=falsehttp://blog.modernmechanix.com/issue/?magname=MechanixIllustrated&magdate=7-1966http://blog.modernmechanix.com/issue/?magname=MechanixIllustrated&magdate=7-1966http://books.google.ro/books?id=SaOfcsyWudAC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=Atkin+%26+Richardson+argumentative&source=bl&ots=XBtm0GsqM6&sig=yaA8NgdlvsZ5mQ6ieOzhmRm219E&hl=ro&ei=EyBLTa_2Ao6SOvib8d8P&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Atkin%20%26%20Richardson%20argumentative&f=falsehttp://books.google.ro/books?id=SaOfcsyWudAC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=Atkin+%26+Richardson+argumentative&source=bl&ots=XBtm0GsqM6&sig=yaA8NgdlvsZ5mQ6ieOzhmRm219E&hl=ro&ei=EyBLTa_2Ao6SOvib8d8P&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Atkin%20%26%20Richardson%20argumentative&f=falsehttp://books.google.ro/books?id=SaOfcsyWudAC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=Atkin+%26+Richardson+argumentative&source=bl&ots=XBtm0GsqM6&sig=yaA8NgdlvsZ5mQ6ieOzhmRm219E&hl=ro&ei=EyBLTa_2Ao6SOvib8d8P&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Atkin%20%26%20Richardson%20argumentative&f=falsehttp://blog.modernmechanix.com/issue/?magname=MechanixIllustrated&magdate=7-1966http://blog.modernmechanix.com/issue/?magname=MechanixIllustrated&magdate=7-1966


12/19

The Fastest Way to Grow Hair

By Robert Brindley

There is only one positive cure for baldness and that is the toupee.

Long the butt of jokes and scornful remarks, there was once a plain brown envelope

sort of mystery surrounding the making, selling, buying and wearing of cranium cozies but all

that has been changed. A man named Louis Feder has made them absolutely undetectable and

non-skid. Most important of all, perhaps, he has won for them a wide social acceptance.

Mr. Feder presides over the House of Feder in New York City. His hairpieces are known as

Tashays (not only a word he coined but a device for which he was granted a U. S. Patent).

Like many bald men, I had long toyed with the idea of trying out a skull falsie and one

day while talking with MI editor Bill Parker, I mentioned this secret thought. His reaction was,

Well, Bob, why dont you look into the matter and give us a report? So, here it is.

I called the House of Feder and made an appointment with Ben Z. Kaplan, executive

vice-president and walking advertisement number one for Louis Feder. Kaplan wears a dark

brown, flecked-with-gray, crew-cut Tashay. He has a missionary zeal for his work. I put the

question to him straight. How about the chances of this brain beanie -(he winced)- blowing

off or sliding into the vichysoisse? He bent his head toward me and said, Pull it. I grabbed ahandful of his hair and gave it a good yank. Absolutely nothing happened (not even a wince). I

was convinced on that score.

Kaplan then took me next door to Mr. Feders office to meet the head headman.

He is a genial sort, obviously proud of his calling. He has probably caused more acres of skin to

be covered than the Legion of Decency. In the course of an hour or so of talking with him I

learned that he gets the hair for his Tashays from various New York importers who have agents

traveling all over Europe buying hair from live peasant women. (The hair of most American

women is unsuitable, having been dyed or made weak and brittle from permanent waving.) It

only takes about an ounce and a half of hair for a mans Tashay.

I also found out that he keeps an assortment of almost 200 shades of hair on hand in his

storeroom and that most, hairpieces contain several different colors (as do most human heads of

hair).

12

315

320

325

330

335

340


13/19

After chatting awhile, Feder stood up and walked behind the chair I was sitting in, saying,

Now let us measure the extent of your baldness. With that he took a grease pencil and traced

right onto my head of skin his conception of where my hairline used to be. Then, with calipers,

he took various measurements and called them out to an assistant, who made notes of each. He

then slapped a wet sheet of blotter like paper on my head, molding it firmly until it had assumed

the true shape of my skull. He removed it carefully and while it was drying Mr. Edward Karp,

vice-president and general manager of the House of Feder, came in with six different try-on

styles of Tashays. They sat me in front of a large mirror and tried each of them on me for effect.

First, came the Madison Avenue a casual, devil-may-care style which featured a part. Karp

laid it on my head and then combed the long sides and tail of the hairpiece right in with my own

remaining locks. There were bright fluorescent lights over the mirror and I swear, even without

the piece being glued down, I couldnt tell where the Federated hair ended and my own began!

Show me more! I exclaimed, with a longing glance at the Dean Martin type of hairpiece,

tousled and curly.

We tried it. But just as Feder had warned, it didnt look right. We tried a few more,

including the pride-and-joy of the House of Feder a crew-cut. Feder beamed, Thats it! When I

confessed to him that crew-cut was the way I used to wear my long-gone curls, he beamed all

over. Okay, he said, come back in two weeks and well have a custom-made Tashay ready for

you.When I returned for the fitting, I took a tour of their factory (over 100 employees) and

saw what had happened to the paper mold Feder had made of my head. From it they had made a

base consisting of a light, yet strong, nylon under layer (which lies next to the scalp) and an over

layer of extremely fine but durable Swiss lace, into which the actual hairs were crocheted in

clumps of three or four.

Feders craftsmen can crochet 750-1,000 hairs into one square inch of hairpiece. There

are 1,000 hairs per square inch in a full natural head of hair. The clumping together gives the

illusion of normal thickness. Feder uses a secret stitch on the front hairline which gives the hair a

bristly, natural, upstanding look.

I was shocked when I saw my very own Tashay for the first time. It was about the size of

a large beaver pelt. Richard Wolkis, Feders top fitter, showed me how to cut, trim and apply the

special double-faced adhesive to the Tashay and form it to my head. Then he carefully barbered

13

345

350

355

360

365

370

25


14/19

the hairpiece to my natural hair. When he finished, there were quantities of hair cuttings on the

floor around the chair such as I hadnt seen in 15 years. It felt great.

Wolkis then combed the fake fur in with the real, applied some hair dressing and handed me a

standard Feder service kit. It contained a roll of the special tape, a small paintbrush for applying

the solvent which removes the tape, a can of Fed-erene (cleaning fluid for the hairpiece) and a

jar of liquid adhesive. Finally I stood ready to face the world, with a full head of hair and a

wagonload of trepidation.

Feder says you can swim in a Tashay. I didnt try that but I did take a 50-mile drive in an

open convertible while wearing the Tashay with no harmful results. I slept in it twice (the first

time because I forgot I had it on). It was still on straight in the morning although it contained a

few snarls. I seem to recall this is natural with a stock head of hair.

With proper care, a toupee should last from one to seven years, depending, naturally, on

how often you wear it. Feder suggests buying them two at a time so youll always have a

wearable one if the other is back at Feders being repaired (or having gray hairs spotted into it, as

you grow older). The spare should be kept in a tight box containing moth flakes or a few old

cigarettes. Moths love hair but hate tobacco.

The going rate for a Tashay the size of mine is $175 although smaller divots (just to

cover a bald spot in the back) can run as low as $80.

Louis Feder has brought the artificial hairpiece business out into the bright sun-fight andfound it can survive the most careful scrutiny. For years, people in show business have worn

hairpieces and their fans knew and accepted that fact. Now, thanks to the strides that have been

made in this field, good old average Joe Bloewe can hold his head high secure in the knowledge

that his Tashay will stay up there without betraying him.

14

375

380

385

390

395


15/19

Annex 2

Standpoint 1. There is one positive cure for baldness and that is the toupee.

Standpoint 2.

Single argumentation

1. The mystery and jokes about the toupees have come to an end with the argument thatthe idea that toupees are bad has changed (3)

1.1[because ]a man named Louis Feder has made them absolutely undetectable and non-skid

[and] has won for them a wide social acceptance (3-5).

Standpoint 3.Coordinative Argumentation (+ Subordinative Argumentation)

400

405


16/19

Annex 3

30


17/19

410


18/19

Annex 4


19/19

415

Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu

Documents

Transcript of Final Paper Argumentation Theory- Andreea Gospodariu