Articol Lilea.pdf

download Articol Lilea.pdf

of 5

Transcript of Articol Lilea.pdf

  • 7/27/2019 Articol Lilea.pdf

    1/5

    Treatment with Peg-IFNa2a/ribavirin and low-dose NSAID forpatients with chronic hepatitis C and rheumatoid syndrome

    Georgiana C. Lilea, Costin T. Streba, Cristin C. Vere and Ion Rogoveanu

    Objective To examine the safety and efficiency of using

    Peg-IFNa2a/ribavirin and low-dose NSAID therapy in

    patients with rheumatoid syndrome (RS) and chronic

    hepatitis C (CHC).

    Methods A group of 10 patients (group 1) known to haveRS and established CHC undergoing Peg-IFNa2a/ribavirin

    and low-dose NSAID therapy was compared with a controlgroup of 10 patients (group 2) also with CHC and

    associated RS, with no antiviral treatment. Their chartswere reviewed for serological and clinical signs of

    rheumatic disease evolution while undergoing this typeof treatment.

    ResultsAt the end of a follow-up period of 12 months,patients receiving low-dose NSAID and Peg-IFNa2a/

    ribavirin therapy showed a sustained virusological

    response and also decreased levels of inflammation

    serological markers, with an improvement in the clinical

    rheumatic symptoms. In contrast, patients in group 2

    showed no significant clinical modification in their

    rheumatic status.

    Conclusion Peg-IFNa2a/ribavirin and low-dose NSAID in

    patients with RS and CHC appear to be well tolerated

    and can be efficient for rheumatic manifestations.Further controlled studies are required to confirm the

    results. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 00:000000 c 2012Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

    European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2012, 00:000000

    Keywords: hepatitis C, NSAID, Peg-IFNa2a/ribavirin, rheumatoid syndrome

    Department of Gastroenterology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy ofCraiova, Craiova, Romania

    Correspondence to Costin T. Streba, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology,University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, St. Petru Rares No 2-4, 200349Craiova, RomaniaTel: + 40 722 389 906; fax: + 40 251 310 287; e-mail: [email protected]

    Received 27 February 2012 Accepted 13 August 2012

    IntroductionHepatitis C virus (HCV), an enveloped positive-stranded

    RNA virus of the genus Hepacivirus spp. and family

    Flaviviridae, is an important epidemiological medical

    problem worldwide with a high rate of infectivity and a

    significant risk for the infected individuals to develop

    chronic hepatitis [1].

    The association between HCV and autoimmune disorders

    is present in daily clinical practice. Laboratory investiga-

    tions carried out in HCV-affected patients may indicate a

    large number of autoantibodies, including anticardiolipinantibodies, rheumatoid factor, smooth muscle antibodies,

    antiparietal cell antibodies, antiliver/kidney microsomal

    antibodies type I, and antineutrophil cytoplasmic anti-

    bodies [24].

    Researchers have suggested various mechanisms to

    explain the association between HCV and autoimmunity,

    taking into consideration the role of chronic hepatitis C

    (CHC) in several autoimmune or immune mediatedconditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, sicca syndrome,

    mixed cryoglobulinemia, pan arteritis nodosa, HCV-

    related arthritis, myasthenia gravis, and psoriatic arthritis.

    Reports show that 0.655.4% of patients with rheumatoid

    syndrome (RS) have been identified as carriers of the

    HCV [5].

    but this type of therapy is problematic because of the

    well-known fact that corticoid treatment has many side-

    effects.

    The mechanism of action of the huge majority of NSAIDs

    is to nonselectively inhibit the cyclooxygenase (COX)enzyme, effecting both the COX-1 and COX-2 isoen-

    zymes. COX is involved in the formation of prostaglan-

    dins and thromboxane from arachidonic acid and

    prostaglandins modulate the inflammation process.

    Interferon-a (IFN-a) is well known for its role in thetreatment of CHC, in particular in association with

    ribavirin. Another efficient role of IFN-a treatment in

    HCV infection relates to the clinical manifestations of

    cryoglobulinemia [6]. However, the involvement of IFN-a therapy in other rheumatologic manifestations asso-

    ciated with CHC has rarely been investigated.

    In this article, we focused on the role of the combination

    between IFN-a/ribavirin and low-dose NSAID in the

    treatment of RS patients who are also affected by CHC

    infection. We aimed to investigate whether this therapy

    could be safe and efficient for rheumatic disease besides

    the impact on viral infection.

    Patients and methodsTwenty female patients with both RS and CHC

    Original article 1

    CE: Jayashree ED: Asra Op: ananth MEG 201813: LWW_MEG_201813

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 7/27/2019 Articol Lilea.pdf

    2/5

    Gastroenterology of the Emergency County Hospital of

    Craiova between 1 July 2010 and 31 December 2010 andthey were included in our study at the beginning of

    January 2011. Their symptoms and blood tests werereviewed 3 months and 12 months after the inclusion in

    the study by reviewing their medical charts. The diseaseduration was 710 years for HCV and 35 years for RS.

    Ten of them (group 1) received IFN-a therapy for a

    period of 12 months. The rest of the patients (group 2)

    refused the antiviral treatment.

    All patients provided informed consent (see attachment)for their inclusion, as well as all the procedures and

    treatments used during this study. We also obtained the

    approval of the ethic committees of the Emergency

    County Hospital of Craiova and of the University of

    Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova.

    Inclusion criteria were as follows: viral load greater than

    1 000 000 IU/ml, minimal liver cytolysis, negative rheuma-

    toid factor, negative anticitrullinated peptide (anti-CCP)antibodies, slight elevation in serological inflammation

    markers, pain complaint in maximum three peripheral

    symmetrical joints with morning stiffness for less than

    30 min, and no radiological modifications.

    All patients underwent intermittent treatment with aminimal dose of NSAID (Coxibs) when required,

    maximum 5 days/month. Patients in group 1 also received

    180 mg Peg-IFNa

    2a and 8001000 mg/day of ribavirinaccording to their body weight.

    Liver function tests plus serum HCV-RNA load and

    inflammation serological markers [erythrocyte sedimenta-

    tion rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP)] were checked

    for both groups at the beginning of treatment, 3 months

    later, and at the end of therapy by reviewing their medical

    charts. Tables 1 and 2 show the evolution of ESR and

    CRP during therapy.

    There were a small number of values for the two

    parameters in the two groups that were registered atthree different time points and they did not always follow

    a normal, Gaussian distribution. Therefore, we decided totest the differences between the means using the

    parametric analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and alsothe nonparametric KruskalWallis test.

    ResultsSustained virusological response, normal levels of liver

    cytolysis enzymes as well as absent joint pain complaintwere found in all 10 patients treated with Peg-IFNa2a/

    ribavirin at the end of the 12 months of therapy.

    In terms of ESR in group 1, we identified a highly

    significant difference between the means of the values

    registered at three different moments (initial, 3 months

    of therapy, 12 months of therapy) both by ANOVA

    (P< 0.0001) and by the KruskalWallis test (P< 0.0001).

    Further analysis showed significant differences betweencertain times of evaluation: initial3 months; initial12

    months; and 312 months.

    No significant difference was found in group 2 in the

    ESR values using both tests (P= 0.189366 and 0.898,

    respectively).

    Figure 1 shows the outcome of the therapy during the 12

    months for the two groups in terms of the ESR levels.

    With respect to CRP in group 1, we identified a highly

    significant difference between the means of the values

    registered at three different time points (initial, 3 months

    of therapy, 12 months of therapy) both by ANOVA

    (P< 0.0001) and by the KruskalWallis test (P< 0.0001).

    Further analysis showed significant differences bet-

    ween certain time points of evaluation: initial3 months;312 months.

    Table 1 Evolution of ESR and C-reactive protein during therapy group 1

    Parameters Initial 3 months 12 months

    ESR 562.17 302.28 200.99CRP 160.99 110.9 3.50.44

    Values are presented as meansSD.CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

    Table 2 Evolution of ESR and C-reactive protein during therapy group 2

    Parameters Initial 3 months 12 months

    ESR 582.22 451.91 551.84CRP 161.11 15.51.03 151.53

    Fig. 1

    Start 54.50 53.70

    49.10

    49.8019.30

    60 40 20

    ESR

    0 20 40 60

    32.503 months

    12 months

    Group I Group II

    Outcome of the therapy during the 12 months for the two groups interms of ESR levels. Values are presented as mm/h (*ANOVA test,P < 0 0001) ANOVA analysis of variance; ESR erythrocyte

    2 European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2012, Vol 00 No 00

  • 7/27/2019 Articol Lilea.pdf

    3/5

    No significant difference was found in group 2 in the

    CRP values using both tests (P= 0.808276 and 0.898,

    respectively).

    Figure 2 shows the outcome of the therapy along the 12months for the two groups in terms of the CRP levels.

    DiscussionIn this study, we present an analysis of 20 patients with

    documented RS and CHC. Ten of them were subjected

    to a 12-month therapy of Peg-IFNa2a/ribavirin and

    intermittent low-dose NSAID. A sustained virusological

    response was obtained, as well as normal levels of livercytolysis enzymes. Moreover, the therapy was efficient for

    the articular symptoms and was well tolerated.

    IFN-a in combination with ribavirin has yielded positive

    results in the treatment of CHC but research data on the

    role of this therapy with respect to the rheumatologic

    manifestations associated with CHC are scarce. Recently,

    several studies have examined the role of IFN and its

    combination with other drugs in various pathologicalsituations, including the association between CHC and

    RS. It was found that treatment with IFN-a may led to a

    marked clinical improvement in HCV-related arthritis

    even without a complete biochemical or virusological

    response [7].

    In a study of 21 HCV-positive patients presentingrheumatoid arthritis symptoms, a beneficial clinical

    response to IFN-a therapy was found in 76% of cases,

    although 43% of patients had detectable cryoglobulin,

    and so a mixed cryoglobulinemia diagnosis could have

    been made for many of these patients [8].

    The association of methotrexate and IFN-a therapy in

    HCV-positive patients who also had rheumatologic

    disorders could be considered for difficult cases [9]. We

    were reluctant to use methotrexate because of its

    for this type of associated pathology involves problematic

    aspects taking into consideration that IFN-a therapy isalso involved in the development of autoimmune

    dysfunction [10]. Nevertheless, starting from the premisethat autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis

    involve immune reactions against specific antigens, Yinget al. [11] investigated the role of type I IFN in antigen-

    induced arthritis in mice and reached the conclusion that

    type I IFN can prevent joint inflammation by down-

    regulating antigen-specific cellular immunity.

    In our study, 10 patients with both CHC and RS received

    IFN-ribavirin in association with intermittent low-doseNSAID for a period of 12 months. Minimal cytolysis

    levels allowed us to use NSAIDs at a minimal dose, only

    5 days/month. The positive effect was indicated by the

    satisfactory results at the end of the 12-month period for

    all 10 patients who underwent this type of therapy.

    Besides experimental arthritis, it was established that

    IFNs can influence gastrointestinal inflammatory dis-

    eases, and also allergic encephalomyelitis and neonatal

    inflammation [12]. This can be considered as evidencefor the anti-inflammatory role of IFN, which has been

    investigated poorly until recently. It has not yet been

    clarified why only certain tissues respond to the anti-

    inflammatory functions of IFN [13]. Some data suggest

    that it can benefit inflammatory disease because of its

    effect on the cytokine cascade [14]. Dinarello [15]

    provided evidence of the anti-inflammatory properties of

    IFN-a by reporting a reduction in interleukin-1 (IL-1)

    and phorbol myristate acetate-induced IL-1 synthesis byIFN-a. However, Abu-Khabar et al. [16] reported that

    IFN-a suppresses tumor necrosis factor-a gene expres-

    sion and protein synthesis in vitro. Moreover, there is

    proof of the induction on IL-10 by IFN-a mostly

    pronounced in activated CD4 cells [17]. Costimulation

    with LPS had a huge impact in terms of the effect ofIFN-a on IL-10 in purified monocytes, all these biological

    reactions participating in the anti-inflammatory mechan-ism of IFN-a [14]. Glisslinger et al. [18] presented

    another conclusive theory for the anti-inflammatory andimmunosuppressive function of IFN-a such as its ability

    to stimulate the hypothalamicpituitaryadrenal axisin vitro and in vivo.

    The hematological impact of IFN-a should also be

    considered. Administration of IFN-a leads to suppressionof hematopoiesis in vivo [19] and, in the case of

    inflammatory disease, this suppression of hematopoiesismay trigger a limited supply of mature effector cells and

    thus a reduced inflammatory process [14].

    As a result of the new discoveries, the efficiency of type 1

    IFNs can be improved by yet another therapeutic

    property of IFNs such as their important activity as

    mediators of anti-inflammatory responses. In our study,

    Fig. 2

    Start

    3 months

    12 months

    20 2015 1510

    15.50

    CRP

    10.90

    5.04 14.80

    15.70

    15.70

    105 50

    Group I Group II

    Outcome of the therapy during the 12 months for the two groups interms of CRP levels. Values are presented as mg/l (*ANOVA test,P< 0.0001). ANOVA, analysis of variance; CRP, C-reactive protein.

    PegIFN/ribavirin and NSAID in HCV and RS Lilea et al. 3

  • 7/27/2019 Articol Lilea.pdf

    4/5

    inflammation marker levels and to improve joint symp-

    toms in all patients in the test group, whereas controlsshowed no alteration in their rheumatic status.

    The limitations of our study were the reduced number of

    patients, further tests on larger groups being necessary to

    confirm the results. We did not encounter any side-

    effects of the antiviral therapy and no indication of

    altered rheumatic manifestations, therefore indicating

    the safety and beneficial clinical effect of this combina-

    tion in the treatment of patients with CHC and RS.

    ConclusionThe association between CHC and RS implies many

    therapy issues. IFN-a is well known for its role in the

    treatment of CHC, particularly in association with

    ribavirin, but its anti-inflammatory functions have only

    recently been investigated. Peg-IFNa2a/ribavirin and

    low-dose NSAID in patients with RS and CHC appear

    to be well tolerated and can be efficient for rheumatic

    manifestations. Our analysis contributes with new

    information that can improve the management of patientsaffected by CHC and RS, further controlled studies being

    required to confirm the results.

    AcknowledgementsGeorgiana C. Lilea acknowledges the support received as

    a PhD student within the project Doctorate an Attractive

    Research Career, contract number POSDRU/ID/88/1.5/S/52826 co-financed by European Social Fund through

    Sectoral Operational Programme for Human ResourcesDevelopment 20072013.

    Conflicts of interest

    There are no conflicts of interest.

    References1 El-Farresh MA, Aly HH, Watashik K, Hijikata M, Egawa H, Shimotohno K.

    In vitro infection of immortalized primary hepatocytes by HCV genotype

    4a and inhibition of virus replication by cyclosporin. Microbiol Immunol2007; 5:127133.

    2 Kessel A, Toubi E. Chronic HCV-related autoimmunity: a consequence ofviral persistence and lymphotropism. Curr Med Chem 2007; 14:547554.

    3 Ghoaim M, AL-Ghamdi A, EL-Bana H, Bakr A, Ghoneim E, ELEdel R, et al.Autoantibodies in chronic liver disease. Egypt J Immunol2005; 12:101111.

    4 Galeazzi M, Bellisai F, Giannitti C, Manganelli S, Morozzi G, Sebastiani GD.Safety of cyclosporin A in HCV-infected patients: experience withcyclosporine A in patients affected by rheumatological disorders andconcomitant HCV infection. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007; 1110:544549.

    5 Aslanidis S, Vassiliadis T, Pyrpasopoulou A, Douloumpakas I, Zamboulis C.Inhibition of TNF-alpha does not induce viral reactivation in patients withchronic hepatitis C infection: two cases. Clin Rheumatol2007; 26:261264.

    6 Cresta P, Musset L, Cacoub P, Frangeul L, Vitour D, Poynard T, et al.Response to interferon alpha treatment and disappearance of

    cryoglobulinaemiain patients infected by hepatitis C virus. Gut 1999;45:122128.

    7 Zuckerman E, Keren D, Rozenbaum M, Toubi E, Slobodin G, Tamir A, et al.Hepatitis C virus-related arthritis: characteristics and response to therapywith interferon alpha. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2000; 18:579584.

    8 Zuckerman E, Yeshurun D, Rosner I. Management of hepatitis C virus-relatedarthritis. BioDrugs 2001; 15:573584.

    9 Nissen MJ, Fontanges E, Allam Y, Zoulim F, Trepo C, Miossec P.Rheumatological manifestations of hepatitis C: incidence in a rheumatologyand non-rheumatology setting and the effect of methotrexate and interferon.Rheumatology 2005; 44:10161020.

    10 Miossec P. Cytokine-induced autoimmune disorders. Drug Saf 1997;17:104.

    11 Ying F, Chalise JP, Narendra SC, Magnusson M. Type I IFN protects againstantigen-induced arthritis. Eur J Immunol 2011; 41:16871695.

    12 Benveniste EN, Qin H. Type I interferons as anti-inflammatory mediators.Sci STKE 2007; 2007:pe70.

    13 Kovarik P, Sauer I, Schaljo B. Molecular mechanisms of the anti-inflammatoryfunctions of interferons. Immunobiology 2007; 212 (910):895901.

    14 Tilg H. New insights into the mechanisms of interferon alfa: animmunoregulatory and anti-inflammatory cytokine. Gastroenterology 1997;112:10171021.

    15 Dinarello CA. Biologic basis for interleukin-1 in disease. Blood 1996;87:20952147.

    16 Abu-Khabar KS, Armstrong JA, Ho M. Type I interferons (IFN-alpha and -beta) suppress cytotoxin (tumor necrosis factor-alpha and lymphotoxin)production by mitogen-stimulated human peripheral bloodmononuclear cells. J Leukoc Biol 1992; 52:165172.

    17 Aman MJ, Tretter T, Eisenbeis I, Bug G, Decker T, Aulitzky WE, et al.Interferon-a stimulates production of interleukin-10 in activated CD4/T cellsand monocytes. Blood 1996; 87:47314736.

    18 Gisslinger H, Svoboda T, Clodi M, Gilly B, Ludwig H, Havelec L, et al.Interferon-alpha stimulates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in vivo andin vitro. Neuroendocrinology 1993; 57:489495.

    19 Guttermann JU. Cytokine therapeutics: lessons from interferon alpha.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 91:11981205.

    4 European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2012, Vol 00 No 00

  • 7/27/2019 Articol Lilea.pdf

    5/5

    AUTHOR QUERY FORM

    LIPPINCOTTWILLIAMS AND WILKINS

    JOURNAL NAME: MEG

    ARTICLE NO: 201813

    QUERIES AND / OR REMARKS

    QUERY NO. Details Required Authors Response

    No queries