Post on 14-Apr-2018
7/30/2019 Dinu C.eficacitatea Diferentiala
1/14
Revista European a Durerii (2002), 6:1-16
Eficacitatea diferenial a interveniilor psihologice pentru reducerea durerii
osteoartritice: comparaie ntre hipnoza Ericksonian i relaxarea Jacobson
Marie Claire Gray, Pierre Phillipot i Oliver Luminet
Universitatea din Paris, departamentul de psihologie
Acest studiu investigheaz eficacitatea hipnozei Ericksoniene i a relaxrii Jacobson n
reducerea durerii din osteoartrit. Participanii care aveau dureri din aceast cauz au fost
repartizai la ntmplare ntr-unul din urmtoarele grupuri: (a) hipnoz (tratamentstandardizat cu 8 edine de hipnoterapie), (b) relaxare (tratament standardizat cu 8
edine de relaxare Jacobson), (c) grupul de control (respectiv lista de ateptare). n
ansamblu rezultatele arat c n cele dou grupuri experimentale nivelul durerii
subiective a fost mai sczut dect n grupul de control i c nivelul durerii subiective a
diminuat n timp. A fost observat de asemenea efectul tratamentului n timp, aparent
efectele fiind mai rapide n cazul utilizrii hipnoterapiei. Rezultatele indic de asemenea
faptul c hipnoza i relaxarea sunt eficace n reducerea cantitii de analgezice folosite de
participani. i nu n cele din urm, rezultatele acestui studiu sugereaz c diferenele
individuale n ce privete imageria modereaz efectul tratamentului psihologic la
urmrirea peste 6 luni, dar nu i dac msurtorile sunt efectuate mai devreme (respectiv
la 4 sptmni dup tratament, la 8 sptmni dup tratament i la 3 luni). Rezultatele
sunt interpretate n termeni de procese psihologice care se afl la baza hipnozei, i a
implicaiilor lor n tratamentul psihologic al durerii.
2002 European Federation of Chapters of the Association for the Study of Pain
Cuvinte cheie: hipnoz, relaxare, imagerie mental, osteoartrit, persoane vrtsnice,
durere
7/30/2019 Dinu C.eficacitatea Diferentiala
2/14
INTRODUCERE
Osteoartrita (OA) este considerat o boal destul de comun, mai ales n rndul populaiei
vrstnice. Aceast patologie se definete prin eroziunea cartilajelor, mrirea oaselor i
apariia de excrescene, care adesea duc la dizabilitate pe termen lung. Principalul
simptom al bolii este durerea. Pe msura creterii expectanei d evia crete i numrul
de persoane care sufer de afeciuni articulare i n mod special OA. n ciuda prevalenei
crescute a OA, nu exist pn la ora actual un tratament specific al acestei boli. Terapiile
medicamentoase pentru persoanele vrstnice care sufer de OA sunt destul de limitate
datorit efectelor lor secundare. La fel i interveniile chirugicale au multiple riscuri i
sunt de obicei rezervate ca ultim linie de tratament pentru durerea extrem de sever
(Turner i Keefe, 1999).O abordare n tratamentul OA sunt tehnicile psihologice care au drept scop
diminuarea durerii subiective. Se cunoate la ora actual faptul c durerea are
componente psihologice care se refer la calitatea ei, intesnitate i caracteristicile sale
spaio-temporale referitor la senzaie, n timp ce procesele afective i motivaionale se
refer la valenele sale negative i aversiune (Melzack i Wall, 1965, 1988, Melzack i
Casey, 1968, Price, 1988). n plus, activitatea cognitiv, care include variabilele sociale i
psihologice referitoare la acea situaie moduleaz aceste procese, n timp ce rspunsurileautonome i comportamentale sunt concepute ca fiind procese rezultante care pot produce
o modulare a feed-back-ului. Aceste consideraii au condus la o perspectiv
biopsihosocial asupra durerii i interveniilor psihologice (Craig, 1994, Fernandez i
Turk, 1992, Arena i Blanchard, 1999).
Interveniile psihologice au aplicaii interesante n OA. S-a artat faptul c adulii
vrstnici care au OA a genunchiului difer considerabil n ce privete utilizarea i
eficacitatea perceput a strategiilor de coping la durere i c aceste strategii sunt legate de
durere i dizabilitate (Keefe i colab, 1987). Percepia durerii poate fi modificat prin
folosirea interveniilor cognitiv- comportamentale (CBT) care au drept scop
mbuntirea auto-eficienei n managementul durerii i dizabilitii (Brandura, 1991).
Aceste intrevenii implic relaxarea, pacing-ul, stabilirea scopurilor, imageria,
restructurarea cognitiv, rezolvarea de probleme i schimbarea stilului de via. Ele s-au
7/30/2019 Dinu C.eficacitatea Diferentiala
3/14
dovedit a fi eficace n reducerea percepiei durerii i dizabilitatii psihologic n
comparaie cu condiiile standard de ngrijire paliativ. Rezultatele sunt de obicei de
durat i persist cteva luni dup finalizarea tratamentului (Basler, 1989, Keefe i colab.,
1990).
Studiile efectuate asupra efectului programelor educaionale n OA (programe de
auto-management al OA) arat c exist i n acest caz efecte semnificative n ce privete
managementul simptomatic. Aceste tehnici au de asemenea scopul de mbuntire a
auto-eficienei. Ele sunt similare cu CBT, dei funrizeaz informaii mai formale
participanilor (despre artrit, exerciii, managementul durerii, depresie, nutriie,
comunicarea cu medicii i familia) (Barlow i colab, 1997, 1988, 1999). Un studiu
comparativ al eficacitii CBT i programelor educaionale arta c exist o mai mare
eficacitate a CBT (Keefe i colab, 1990), n timp ce programele educaionale par s numai fie eficace dup un an (Calfas i colab, 1994). Aceste observaii sunt doar
preliminare i este nevoie ca studiile s fie repetate.
n consecin, este clar c interveniile psihologice afecteaz nivelul durerii la
pacienii cu OA i c aceste intervenii sunt eficace n tratamentul OA. Oricum,
cercetrile existente nu au stabilit nc dac toate componentele acestor intrevenii sunt
necesare pentru ca interveniile s fie eficace sau dac eficacitatea lor se datoreaz
anumitor componente specifice. Studiile viitoare trebuie s stabileasc care suntingredientele interveniilor eficace.
n plus, anumite tipuri de interveie s-au dovedit a fi eficace pentru reducerea
durerii n alte afeciuni, dar ele nu au fost nc testate pentru OA. De exemplu, este
surprinztor faptul c eficacitatea hipnozei n OA nu a fost studiat pentru tratamentul
durerii, n ciuda dovezilor evidente din clinic i cercetare care arat c hipnoza
acioneaz asupra durerii. ntr-adevr, cercetrile fundamentale au artat c hipnoza este
eficient ca tehnic cognitiv de producere a analgeziei (Hilgard, 1975, Hilgard i
Hilgard, 1975, Sheehan i Perry, 1976, Girodo i Wood, 1979, Spanos i colab, 1984,
1985, 1990, Tripp i Marks, 1986, Stam i colab, 1984, Elton i colab, 1988, Zeltzer i
colab, 1989, Baker i Kirsch, 1993, Chaves, 1999, Yachariae i Bjering, 1994,
Montogomery i colab, 2000) i pentru modificarea percepiei durerii, respectiv hipo- i
hiperlagie (Meier i colab, 1993), precum i n creterea sau descreterea pragului durerii
7/30/2019 Dinu C.eficacitatea Diferentiala
4/14
(Arendt, Nielsen, 1990), precum i n diferenierea dimensiunilor durerii (Houle i colab,
1988, Malone i colab, 1989, Price, 1996, price i Barber, 1987, Rainville i colab, 1999).
Mai mult, Kiernan i colab, 1995, raporteaz c hipnoza are un efect psihologic msurabil
n modificarea nivelului durerii. Aceasta sugeeraz c rapoartele subiective pot reflecta
consecinele fizice ale unor intervenii eficace. Oricum, bazele biologice ale proceselor
hipnotice rmn nc contestate (Wagestaff, 1999) i sunt necesare studii ulterioare.
Eficacitatea hipnozei n reducerea durerii a fost de asemenea testat n cercetarea
clinic. n plus fa de numeraoasele rapoarte de caz care indic eficacitatea hipnozei
pentru reducerea durerii (Barber i colab, 1996, Covino i Frankel, 1998, Chaves, 1999),
mai multe studii clinice controlate au fost realizate utiliznd hipnoza pentru controlarea
durerii. Studiile clinice din stomatologie (Stam i colab, 1084, Enquist i Fisher, 1997), n
tratamentul arsurilor (Wakemann i Kaplan, 1978, Patterson i colab, 1989, 1992,Patterson i Ptacek, 1997), n chirurgie (lambert, 1996, Faymonville i colab, 1997,
Maurer i colab, 1999) i radiologie (Lang i colab, 1996), au indicat c aceast tehnic
este eficace att n durerea cronic ct i n cea acut. De asemenea hipnoza este eficient
n tratamentul durerii cronice din migren (Anderson i colab, a975, Ter Kuile i colab,
1994, 1995, 1996, Emerson i Trexler, 1999, Spinhoven, 2000), n colonul iritabil
(Galowski i Blanchard, 1998), n tumori (Spiegel i Bloom, 1983, Syriayia i colab,
1992, liossi i Hatira, 1999), n artrita reumatoid (Geissner i colab, 1994, Horton imitzdorf, 1994), durerile de spate (Burte i colab, 1994), fibromialgie (Haanen i colab,
1991) i boala coronarian /Weinstein i Au, 1991). Oricum, nu s-a dovedit mc c
hipnoza ar fi mai eficace dect alte tehnici psihologice. Dou meta-analize recente nu
arat diferene semnificative ntre analgezia sugerat i strategiile de management ale
durerii prin tehnici non-hipnotice, ca de exemplu relaxarea, instruciunile motivaionale
centrate pe sarcina, CBT, training-ul autogen i meditaia (Chaves i Dworkin, 1997,
Montogomery i colab, 2000), chiar dac unele studii clinice indic faptul c hipnoza ar
putea fi mai eficient dect relaxarea n cazul durerilor acute din arsuri (Patterson i
Ptacek, 1997) i pentru durerile cronice severe cum sunt cele din artrita reumatoid
(Horton i Mitzdorf, 1994, Geissner i colab, 1994) i fribromialgie (Haanen i colab,
1991). Dificultatea n diferenierea eficacitii analgeziei sugerate n comparaie cu alte
tratamente non-hipnotice poate fi explicat prin faptul c cele mai multe tehnici (hipnoza,
7/30/2019 Dinu C.eficacitatea Diferentiala
5/14
imageria ghidat, trainingul autogen, meditaia) au componente de relaxare. n
consecin, se nate ntrebarea dac toate tehnicile eficace sunt de fapt varaiiuni ale
relaxarii sau dac toate aceste tehnici posed un alt ingredient activ, respectiv altul dect
relaxarea. Tehnicile pot fi diferite ca denumire sau fundal teoretic dar pot fi foarte
similare n practic. Acesta este cazul, de exemplu, pentru hipnoz i imageria ghidta.
Distincia ntre cele dou a fost realizat iniial ca i consecin a dezbaterilor asupra
rolului atribuit imageriei mentale n procesele hipnotice (Spanos i Barber, 1972, Barber,
1972, Wilson i Barber, 1982). Mai mult, eficacitatea relaxrii nsi pentru diminuarea
durerii n OA nu a fost evaluat separat n studiile anterioare (Calfas i colab, 1994,
Keefe i colab, 1990, barlow i colab, 1997, 1998, 1999), ci a fost inclus n programe
globale care aveau derpt scop reducerea durerii. Aceast stare de fapt face neecsar
realizarea rapid de studii controlate care s determine gradul de specificitate aldiferitelor tehnici psihologice descrise.
Un alt factor important n stabilirea eficacitii interveniilor clinice trebuie s
determine dac exist diferene individuale n ce privete rspunsul la interveia
respectiv. Aceast ntrebare pare n mod particular relevant pentru relaxare i hipnoz
deoarece exista mari variaii individuale n ce privete caapcitatea de imagerie (Denis,
1991, Lang, 1979, 1980, McKleive, 1995) i deoarece cercetrile din domeniul
susceptibilitii hipnotice au artat c rspunsul hipnotic se coreleaz cu factorii deimagerie (pentru o tercere n revist vezi Nadon i colab, 1987). Este interesant c dei s-
a demonstrat clar c relaxarea nu duce la creterea rspunsului hipnotic (Hilgard, 1965,
Council, 1999), Delmonte, 1981, a artat c susceptibilitatea hipnotic poate fi activat la
persoanele care mediteaz sau sunt relaxate, n aceast stare ei fiind caapbili s rspund
la sugestiile hipnotice.
Principalul scop al acestui studiu este de a investiga dac tratamentul controlat
prin hipnoz este eficace n reducerea durerii din OA. n plus studiul a fost astfel realizat
nct s clarifice impactul rspunsului terapeutic la relaxare i procesele de imagerie care
sunt active n hipnoz. ntr-adevr ipoteza naostr este aceea c relaxarea, mai ales dac
este folosit ca inducie hipnotic, joac un rol important n rspunsul terapeutic. Cu acest
scop au fost create trei grupuri experimentale: un grup de control aflat pe lista de
ateptare, un grup n care se aplic un tratament standardizat de 8 edine de relaxare i
7/30/2019 Dinu C.eficacitatea Diferentiala
6/14
un grup n care se aplic tratamentul standradizat de 8 edine de hipnoz. Aceast
structur permite separarea efectelor care sunt specifice relaxrii de acelea care sunt
specifice hipnozei.
Studiul de fa se adreseaz de asemenea eficactii hipnozei, modificate de
susceptibilitatea hipnotic individual i imageria mental. Pentru a evalua diferenele
individuale privitoare la imagerie i capcitile hipnotice am utilizat dou teste, unul acre
evaluaez abilitatea hipnotic de a rspunde la sugestiile hipnotice, i cel de-al doilea,
care msoar dou componente ale imageriei mentale.
REFERENCES
Anderson JAD, Basker MA, Dalton R. Migraine and hyp- notherapy. Int J Clin Exp Hypn
1975; 23: 48-58.
Arena JG, Blanchard EB. Biofeedback and relaxation therapy for chronic pain disorders.In: Gatchel RJ, Turk DC, editors. Psychological Approaches to Pain Management: a
Practitioner's Handbook. New York: Guilford, 1999.
Arendt-Nielsen L, Zachariae R, Bjerring P. Quantitative evaluation of hypnotically
suggested hyperaesthesia and analgesia by painful laser stimulation. Pain 1990; 42: 243-
251.
Baker SL, Kirsch I. Hypnotic and placebo analgesia: order effects and the placebo label.
Contemp Hypn 1993; 10: 117-126.Bandura A. Self efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol 1991; 37(2): 122-
140.
Barber TX. Suggested (`hypnotic') behavior: the trance paradigm versus an alternate
paradigm. In: Fromm E, Shor R, editors. Hypnosis: Research Development and
Perspectives. New York: Adline-Atherton, 1972: 115-182.
Barber J et al. editor. Hypnosis and Suggestion in the Treatment of Pain: a Clinical
Guide. New York: Norton, 1996.
Barlow JH, Williams B, Wright CC. Improving arthritis self-management among older
adults: `Just what the doctor didn't order'. Br J Health Psychol 1997; 2 (part 2):
175-186.
Barlow JH, Turner AP, Wright CC. Sharing, caring and learning to take control: self
management training for people with arthritis. Psychol Health Med 1998; 3(4):
7/30/2019 Dinu C.eficacitatea Diferentiala
7/14
387-393.
Barlow JH, Williams B, Wright CC. `Instilling the strength to fight the pain and get on
with life': learning to become an arthritis self-manager through an adult education
programme. Health Educ Res. 1999; 14(4): 533-544.
Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social
psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc
Psy- chol 1986; 51: 1173-1182.
Baroussa M, Leclerc C. L'hypnose Clinique en Medecine Dentaire. Montreal: Me ridien,
1991.
Basler HD, Rehfish HP. Psychologische Schmerztherapie in Rheuma-Liga-
Selfhilfegruppen (Psychological pain therapy in rheumatism self help groups). Z Klin
Psychol Forsch Prax 1989; 18(3): 203-214.Benson H. The relaxation response: its subjective and objective historical precedents and
physiology. Trends Neurosci 1983; 6(7): 281-284.
Burte JM, Burte WD, Araoz DL. Hypnosis in the treatment of back pain. Aust J Clin Exp
Hypn 1994; 15(2): 93-115.
Calfas KJ, Kaplan RM, Ingram RE. One year evaluation of cognitive behavioral
intervention in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res 1994; 5(4): 202-209.
Chaves JF. Hypnosis in pain management: implications of alternative theoreticalperspectives. In: Kirsch I, Capafons A, Cardena BE, Amigo S, editors. Clinical
Hypnosis and Self Regulation: Cognitive-Behavioral Perspectives. Dissociation, Trauma,
Memory, and Hypnosis Book Series. Washington, DC: American Psychological
Association, 1999: 227-247.
Chaves JF, Dworkin SF. Hypnotic control of pain: historical perspectives and future
prospects. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 1997; 45: 356-376.
Council JR. Measures of hypnotic responding. In: Kirsch I, Capafons A, Cardena BE,
Amigo S, editors. Clinical Hypnosis and Self-Regulation: Cognitive Behavioral Per-
spectives. Dissociation, Trauma, Memory and Hypnosis Book Series. Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association, 1999.
Covino N, Frankel FH. Hypnosis and relaxation in the medically ill and other conditions.
In: Fava GA, Freyberger H, editors. Handbook of Psychosomatic Medicine. Stress and
7/30/2019 Dinu C.eficacitatea Diferentiala
8/14
Health Series. Madison, CT, US International University Press, 1998: 541-566.
Craig KD. Emotional aspects of pain. In: Wall PD, editor. Textbook of Pain. Edinburgh:
Churchill Livingstone, 1994.
Delmonte MM. Suggestibility and meditation. Pychol Rep 1981; 48(3): 727-737.Denis
M. Image and Cognition. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991.
Elton D, Boggie-Cavallo P, Stanley GP. Group hypnosis and instructions of personal
control in the reduction of ischaemic pain. Aust J Clin Exp Hypn 1988; 16: 31-37.
Emerson GJ, Trexler G. An hypnotic intervention for migraine control. Aust J Clin Exp
Hypn 1999; 27(1): 54-61.
Enqvist B, Fisher K. Preoperative hypnotic techniques reduce consumption of analgesics
after surgical removal of third mandibular molars: a brief communication. Int J
Clin Exp Hypn 1997; 45(2): 102-108.Erickson M, Rossi E. Experiencing Hypnosis. New York: Irvington, 1981.
Faymonville ME, Mambourg PH, Joris J, Vrigens B, Fissette J, Albert A, Lamy M.
Psychological approaches during conscious sedation. Hypnosis versus stress redu- cing
strategies: a prospective randomized study. Pain 1997; 73(3): 361-367.
Fernandez E, Turk DC. Sensory and affective components of pain: separation and
synthesis. Psychol Bull 1992; 112(2): 205-217.
Galovski TE, Blanchard EB. The treatment of irritable bowel syndrome withypnotherapy.Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 1998; 23(4): 219-232.
Geissner E, Jungnitsch G, Schmitz J. Psychological approaches to the treatment of pain: a
therapy comparison study among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Z Klin
Psychol Psychopathol Psychother 1994; 42(4): 319-338.
Girodo M, Wood D. Talking yourself out of pain: the importance of believing that you
can. Cognitive Ther Res 1979; 3: 23-33.
Haanen HCM, Hoenderlos HTW, Van Romunde LKJ. Controlled trial of hypnotherapy in
the treatment of refractory fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 1991; 18: 72-75.
Hendler CS, Redd WH. Fear of hypnosis: the role of labeling in patients' acceptance of
behavioral interventions. Behav Ther 1986; 17(1): 2-13.
Hilgard ER. Hypnotic Susceptibility. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1965.
Hilgard ER. The alleviation of pain by hypnosis. Pain 1975; 1: 213-231.
7/30/2019 Dinu C.eficacitatea Diferentiala
9/14
Hilgard ER, Hilgard JR. Hypnosis in the Relief of Pain. Los Altos, CA: William
Kaufmann, 1975.
Horton JR, Mitzdorf U. Clinical hypnosis in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
Psychol Beitrage 1994; 36(1-2): 205-212.
Houle M, McGrath PA, Mora G, Garett OJ. The efficacy of hypnosis and relaxation-
induced analgesia on two dimensions of pain for cold pressor and electrical tooth
pulp stimulation. Pain 1888; 33(2): 241-251.
Huskisson EC. Visual analogue scales. In: Melzack R, editor. Pain Measurement and
Assessment. New York: Raven, 1983: 33-37.
Keefe FJ, Caldwell DS, Queen KT, Gil KM, Martinez S, Crisson JE, Ogden W, Nunley J.
Pain coping strategies in osteoarthritis patients. J Consult Clin Psychol 1987; 55: 208-
212.Keefe FJ, Caldwell DS, Williams DA, Gil KM. Pain coping skills training in the
management of osteoarthritic knee pain: a comparative study. Behav Ther 1990a; 21:
4962.
Keefe FJ, Caldwell DS, Williams DA, Gil KM. Pain coping skills training in the
management of osteoarthritic knee pain. II. Follow-up results. Behav Ther 1990b; 21:
435-447.
Kiernan BD, Dane JR, Philips LH, Price DD. Hypno- analgesia reduces R-III nociceptivereflex: further evidence concerning the multifactorial nature of hypnotic
analgesia. Pain 1995; 60: 39-47.
Kirby KN, Kosslyn SM. Thinking visually. In: Humphrey GW, editor. Understanding
Vision: an 14 M.-C. GAY ET AL. European Journal of Pain (2002), 6 Interdisciplinary
Perspective. Readings in Mind and Language. Oxford: Blackwell 1992: 7186.
Kokoszka A. Relaxation as an altered state of consciousness: a rationale for a general
theory of relaxation. Int J Psychosom 1992; 39(1-4): 281-284
Kunzendorf RG. Mental Imagery. New York: Plenum, 1991.
Lambert SA. The effects of hypnosis/guided imagery on the postoperative course of
children. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1996; 17(5): 307-310.
Lang PJ. A bio-informational theory of emotional Imagery. Psychophysiology 1979;
16(6): 495-512.
7/30/2019 Dinu C.eficacitatea Diferentiala
10/14
Lang PJ. Emotional imagery: conceptual structure and pattern of somato-visceral
response. Psychophysiology 1980; 17(2): 179-192.
Lang E, Joyce JS, Spiegel D, Hamilton D. Self hypnotic relaxation during interventional
radiological procedures: effects on pain perception and intravenous drug use. Int J Clin
Exp Hypn 1996; 44(2): 106-119.
Liossi C, Hatira P. Clinical hypnosis versus cognitive behavioral training for pain
management with pediatric cancer patients undergoing bone marrow aspirations. Int
J Clin Exp Hypn 1999; 47(2): 104-116.
Malone MD, Kurtz RD, Strube MJ. The effect of hypnotic suggestion on pain report. Am
J Clin Hypn 1989; 31(4): 221-230.
Matthews WJ. Ericksonian approaches to hypnosis and therapy: where are we now? Int J
Clin Exp Hypn 2000; 48(4): 418-426.Mauer MH, Burnett KF, Ouellette EA, Tronson GH, Dandes HM. Medical hypnosis and
orthopedic hand surgery: pain perception, postoperative recovery, and therapeutic
comfort. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 1999; 47(2): 144-161.
McKelvie SJ. Vividness of visual imagery: measurement, nature, function and dynamics.
In: Journal of Mental Imagery Series, Vol. 5. New York: Brandon House, 1995.
Meier W, Klucken M, Soyka D, Bromm B. Hypnotic hypo and hyperalgesia: divergent
effects on pain ratings and pain-related cerebral potentials. Pain 1993; 53: 175-181.Melzack R, Casey KL. Sensory, motivational, and central determinants of pain: a new
conceptual model. In: Kenshado D, editor. The Skin Sense. Springfield, IL: Thomas,
1968.
Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science 1965; 150: 971-979.
Melzack R, Wall PD. The Challenge of Pain, revised editor. Harmondsworth: Penguin,
1988.
Montgomery GH, Duhamel KN, Redd WH. A meta-analysis of hypnotically induced
analgesia: how effective is hypnosis? Int J Clin Exp Hypn 2000; 48(2): 138-153.
Nadon R, Laurence JR, Perry C. Multiple predictors of hypnotic susceptibility. J Pers Soc
Psychol 1987; 53: 948-960.
Paivio A. Imagery and Verbal Processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971.
7/30/2019 Dinu C.eficacitatea Diferentiala
11/14
Patterson DR, Ptacek JT. Baseline pain as a moderator of hypnotic analgesia for burn
injury treatment. J Consult Clin Psychol 1997; 65(1): 60-67.
Patterson DR, Questad KA, Delateur BJ. Hypnotherapy as an adjunct to narcotic
analgesia for the treatment of pain for burn debridement. Am J Clin Hypn 1989; 31:
156-163.
Patterson DR, Everett JJ, Burns GL, Marvin JA. Hypnosis for the treatment of burn pain.
J Consult Clin Psychol 1992; 60: 713-717.
Price DD. Psychological and Neural Mechanisms of Pain. New York: Raven, 1988.
Price DD. Hypnotic analgesia: psychological and neural mechanisms. In: Barber J, editor.
Hypnosis and Suggestion in the Treatment of Pain: a Clinical Guide. New York:
Norton, 1996.
Price DD, Barber J. An analysis of factors that contribute to the efficacy of hypnoticanalgesia. J Abnorm Psychol 1987; 96: 46-51.
Rainville P, Carrier B, Hofbauer RK, Bushnell MC, Duncan GH. Dissociation of sensory
and affective dimensions of pain using hypnotic modulation. Pain 1999; 82(2): 159-171.
Sarbin T, Coe W. Hypnosis: a Social Psychological Analysis of Influence
Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1972.
Sheehan PW, Perry CW. Methodologies of Hypnosis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1976.
Spanos NP, Barber TX. Cognitive activity during `hypnotic' suggestibility: goal-directedfantasy and the experience of nonvolition. J Person 1972; 40(4): 510-524.
Spanos NP, Kennedy SK, Gwynn MI. Moderating effects of contextual variables on the
relationship between hypnotic susceptibility and suggested analgesia. J Abnorm Psychol
1984; 93: 285-294.
Spanos NP, Ollerhead VG, Gwynn MI. The effects of three instructional treatments on
pain magnitude and pain tolerance: implications for theories of hypnotic analgesia.
Imagin, Cogn Person 1985; 5: 521-337.
Spanos NP, Brett PJ, Menary EP, Cross NP. A measure of attitudes toward hypnosis;
relationship with absorption and hypnotic susceptibility. Am J Clin Hypn 1987; 30(2):
139-150.
Spanos NP, Perlini AH, Patrick L, Bells S, Gwynn MI. The role of compliance in
hypnotic and non hypnotic analgesia. J Res Person 1990; 24: 433-453.
7/30/2019 Dinu C.eficacitatea Diferentiala
12/14
Spanos NP, Gabora NJ, Hyndford C. Expectancies and interpretations in hypnotic
responding. Am J Clin Exp Hypn 1991; 19(2): 87-89.
Spiegel H, Bloom JR. Group therapy and hypnosis reduce metastatic breast carcinoma
pain. Psychosom Med 1983; 45: 333-339.
Spielberger CD. State Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y) (Self Evaluation Questionnaire).
Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press, 1983.
Spinhoven P, Ter Kuile MM. Treatment outcome expectancies and the hypnotic
susceptibility as moderators of pain reduction in patients with chronic tension-type
headache. Intl J of Clin Exp Hypn 2000; 48: 290-305.
Spinhoven P, Linssen ACG, Van Dyck R, Zitman FG. Autogenic training and self-
hypnosis in the control of tension headache. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1992; 14: 408415.
Stam HJ, McGrath PA, Brooke RI. The effects of a cognitive-behavioral treatmentprogram on tempero- mandibular pain and dysfunction syndrome. Psychosom
Med 1984; 46: 534-545.
Syrjala LK, Abrams JR. Hypnosis and imagery in the treatment of pain. In: Gatchel RJ,
Turk DC, editors.
Psychological Approaches to Pain Management: a Practitioner's Handbook. New York:
Guilford, 1999: 231-258
Syrjala LK, Cummings C, Donaldson GW. Hypnosis or cognitive behavioral training forthe reduction of pain and nausea during cancer treatment: a controlled clinical trial.
Pain 1992; 48: 137-146.
Tan SY. Cognitive and cognitive-behavioral methods for pain control: a selective review.
Pain 1982; 12: 201-228.
Ter Kuile MM, Moniek M, Spinhoven P, Linssen A, Corry G. Responders and non
responders to autogenic training and cognitive self hypnosis: prediction of short-
and long-term success in tension-type headache patients. Headache 1995; 35(10): 630-
636.
Ter Kuile MM, Moniek M, Spinhoven P, Linssen A, Corry G, van Houwelingen HC.
Cognitive coping and appraisal processes in the treatment of chronic headache. Pain
1996; 64(2): 257-264.
7/30/2019 Dinu C.eficacitatea Diferentiala
13/14
Tripp EG, Marks D. Hypnosis, relaxation and analgesia, suggestions for the reduction of
reported pain in high and low-suggestible subjects. Aust J Clin Exp Hypn 1986; 14:
99-113.
Turner JA, Keefe FJ. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain. In: Mitchel M,
editor. Pain 1999 Dan Updated Review. Seattle, WA: IASP Scientific Program
Committee, IASP Press, 1999.
Wagstaff GF. In: Kirsch I, Capafons A, Cardena BE, Amigo S, editors. Clinical Hypnosis
and Self-Regulation: Cognitive Behavioral Perspectives. Dissociation, Trauma, Memory
and Hypnosis Book Series. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1999:
277-308.
Wakeman RJ, Kaplan JZ. An experimental study of hypnosis in painful burns. Am J Clin
Hypn 1978; 31: 181-191.Weinstein EJ, Au PK. Use of hypnosis before and during angioplasty. Am J Clin Exp
Hypn 1991; 34: 29-37.
Weitzenhoffer AM, Hilgard ER. Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Forms C. Palo
Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1962.
Wilson SC, Barber TX. The fantasy-prone personality:implications for understanding
imagery, hypnosis, and parapsychologicalphenomena.PSIRes1982;1(3):94-116.
Zachariae R, Bjerring P. Laser-induced pain-related brain potentials and sensory painratings in high and low hypnotizable subjects during hypnotic suggestions of relaxa-
tion, dissociated imagery, focused analgesia, and placebo. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 1994;
42(1): 56-80.
Zahourek RP. Relaxation and imagery: tools for therapeutic communication and
intervention. In: Zahourek RP, editor. Relaxation and Imagery: Tools for Therapeutic
Communication and Intervention. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders/Harcourt Brace
Javanowich, 1988: 3-27.
Zeltzer LK, Fanurik D, LeBaron S. The cold pressor pain paradigm in children:feasibility
of an intervention model. Pain 1989; 37: 305-313.
Zung WK. A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1965; 12: 63-7016
M.-C. GAY ET AL.
European Journal of Pain (2002), 6
7/30/2019 Dinu C.eficacitatea Diferentiala
14/14