EMIS ASIA
-
Upload
ovidiu-mihail-alboiu -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of EMIS ASIA
-
7/28/2019 EMIS ASIA
1/3
3. Information Technology
(EMIS and GIS)
1) Development of EMIS in Asiaand the Pacific Region
Mr. Nyi Nyi Thaung
Consultant - EMIS Training Specialist
UNESCO Principal Regional Office for Asia and
the Pacific (PROAP)
1. Introduction
1) Outline
a) UNESCO and other agencies involvement in
developing EMIS
b) Development of EMIS (Formal vs. Non-formal
education)
c) LRCs EMIS
d) Analytical tools and methods for utilizing EMIS
information
e) Q & A
2. UNESCO and Other Agencies Involvement in
Developing EMIS
1) Development of EMIS in Asia and the Pacific
region
a) Most of the countries have already set up the
EMIS
b) Under the authority of Ministry of Educationc) In Collaboration with National Statistical Office,
Research Institutes
d) Sometime as autonomous organization
e) Mostly centralized system
2) Some EMIS authority in country
a) Bangladesh Bureau of Educational Information
and Statistics (BANBEIS)
b) Education Planning Division (Bhutan)
c) Department of Planning (EMIS Resource Center)
(Cambodia)
d) Statistics Division, Development and PlanningDepartment, Ministry of Education (China)
e) Department of Education (Planning), Ministry of
Human Resource Development (India)
f) National Institute of Educational Planning and
Administration (NIEPA) (India)
g) Indonesia Educational Statistics Office of
Educational and Cultural Research and Develop-
ment, Ministry of Education and Culture
(Indonesia)
h) Department of Planning and co-operation,
Ministry of Education (Lao PDR)
i) Statistics and Computer Section, Ministry of
Education (Nepal)j) Research and Statistics Division, Office of
Planning Service, Department of Education,
Culture and Sports (Philippines)
j) Bureau of Policy and Planning, Ministry of
Education (Thailand)
k) Educational Management Information Centre,
MOET (Vietnam)
3) Technical Assistance of establishing and strengthen-
ing EMIS system in Member Statesa) Cambodia (UNDP-UNESCO)
b) Myanmar (UNICEF)
c) Lao PDR (ADB)
d) Vietnam (EU)
e) Fuji (UNESCO, AusAID)
f) Vanuatu, Marshall Island
g) Papua New Guinea (UNDP-UNESCO, Aus AID)
4) Development of Computerized EMIS and Decision
Support System (DSS)
a) Dos based EMIS System in 1989
b) EMIS 2.0 training packagec) EMIS 2.6 (Fuji)
d) EMIS 2.6a IIEP training package
e) EMIS 1.1 analytical module package
f) EMIS 1.1a analytical module package
g) EG 1.0 integrated training software package for
EMIS
h) Childinfo (Decision Support System)
3. Development of EMIS (Formal vs. Non-
formal education)
1) Experience learned
a) EMIS in Formal Educationb) Two types of data collection style
- Schools directly send to EMIS center and process
centrally
- Schools send to directly education authority,
summarized and sent to province authority
summarized and send to EMIS center
c) Central process system
- Delay
- Difficult to validate and follow-up
- Over burden
- Lack of information in district and provincial
levelsd) Compiled from lower level of authority
- Depend heavily on skill and performance of local
authority
- Required training/ incentives
- Unable to provide required facilities to local
authorities
e) Parallel data collecting authority
- Overlapping
- Repeated data collection
- Inconsistency data
- Waste of resources
f) Lack of analytical skill and under utilization of
collected data
- Too much collected data
- Unable to process
- Analytical capacities and resources
-
7/28/2019 EMIS ASIA
2/3
g) Proper use of information technology
- Too much relied on computer
- Difficult to maintenance and update
- Complicated system
- Lack of training and documentation
h) Development of EMIS Application package
- User friendly- Adequate documentation
- Adequate training
- Easy to update and maintain
- Compatible with other existing software pack-
ages
- Modular design
2) Development of EMIS in Nonformal education
Formal Education Nonformal Education
- Already established-Relatively new- Centralized authority - Different organization
(Govt. NGOs, other
Ministries)
- School based - Community based
- Well defined definition/norm - Own standard and norm
(Global definition) (Local definition)
- Mostly intended for- More focused on
policy formulation monitoring and
4. Development of LRC EMIS
1) Focus should be on:
a) Programme monitoring and evaluationb) Daily operation
c) Information dissemination for policy formulation
and implementation
2) LRC data collection forms
a) Form 1: Literacy facts and figures
b) Form 2: Literacy classes
c) Form 3: Post-literacy classes
d) Form 4: Learners
e) Form 5: Facilitators
3) Form 1: Literacy facts and figures
a) Information dissemination for policy formulation
and implementationb) Yearly
c) Collection time
d) Fix places or not
4) Sample outputs from Form 1
a) Sex ratio
b) Dependency ratio
c) Household size
d) Per-capita income
e) Number of literate and illiterate population
f) Literacy rate
g) Number of literacy courses (by organizers)
h) Qualitative information on living standard,
languages, religions, community support
i) Information on access to formal education
5) Sample outputs from Form 2
a) Total numbers of classes per year
b) Total number of learner per year by gender
c) Total number of successful learners per year by
gender
d) Completion rage
e) Class/ facilitator ratio
f) Learner/ facilitator ratio
g) Cost per class, cost per pupil6) Sample outputs from Form 2 and 3
a) Characteristics of literacy classes
b) Characteristics of curriculum
c) Characteristics of teaching/ learning materials
d) Characteristics of teaching/ learning strategies
e) Qualitative information on community/ learner
commitment, learning centers
f) Qualitative information on monitoring and
evaluation system
7) Sample outputs from Form 4
Characteristics of learners
Gender, age, marital status, income, educationalexperience, attendance, performance, social and
occupational status
8) Sample outputs from Form 5
Characteristics of facilitators
Gender, age, marital status, qualification and
teaching experience, social and occupational
status
9) Data Organization
a) Time series data
b) Gross-sectional data
c) Group data
d) Summarized data
e) Detailed dataf) Conditional data
10) Output layouts
a) Reports
b) Indicators
c) Graphics and charts
d) Statistical analysis (quantitative and qualitative)
11) Basic measuring tools
a) Scale
b) Rate, ratio, percentage
c) Use of graph
d) Some useful tools in Excel
12) Education statistics and indicatorsTwo types of data
a) Stock (buck, total looking at a time as it is)
b) Flow (dynamic show changes and compare
over time and space)
Stock data are known as statistics while most flow
data are indicators.
5. Some Common Measuaring Tools Used in
Education Statistics and Indicators
1) Four levels of measurement
a) Nominal scale, b) Ordinal scale, c) Interval scale,
and d) Ratio scale
2) Basic measures
a) Ratio, b) Proportion, c) Percentage, and 4) Rate
-
7/28/2019 EMIS ASIA
3/3
12) Representative index
a) This index one of the indicators used for measur-
ing disparities
b) Designed to show whether any given group in
the category is receiving more or less same share
than it would normally shown.
13) Gender disparity indexa) The ratio of the female to male adult literacy rates
measures progress towards gender equity in
literacy and the level of learning opportunities
available for women in relation to those available
to men,. It serves also as a significant indicator
of the empowerment of women in society.
b) When the literacy gender parity index shows a
value equal to 1, female literacy and male literacy
rates are equal. A value less than 1 indicates that
proportionately fewer women than men have
basic literacy skills, and conversely, a value
exceeding 1 indicators that proportionately fewermen have basic literacy skills.
14) Geni coefficient
Provides a statistical basis for measuring the degree to
which a particular characteristics is equally distributed
throughout the system.
3) Ratio
a) A ratio results from dividing one quantity by
another
b) The numerator and denominator are from two
distinct populations
c) Mutually exclusive
4) ProportionThe numerator in proportion is a part of the
denominator.
P =
5) Percentage
A proportion or a fraction becomes when it is
expressed in terms of per hundred units (denomina-
tor is normalized to one hundred)
6) Rate
a) Ratios, proportion, and percentages are static
measures
b) Rate is associated with the dynamic (changes)c) A measure of change in one quantity (y) per unit
of another quantity (x)
d) Usually the x variables is time
e) All elements in denominators have to be at risk of
becoming or producing elements in the numera-
tors (rate vs. proportion)
7) Graphical presentation
a) Bar graph compare the values of different items in
specific categories or at discrete points in time
b) Line graph shows the progression of value over
time
c) Stack bar graph show the actual value each series
contribute to the totald) 100% stacked bar graph show the percentage
each series contributes to the total
e) Pie graph compare individual values to the whole
8) Measuring inequalities
a) By sex
b) By urban/rural
c) By geographical area
9) The techniques used to describe disparities
a) Absolute and relative deviation
b) Representative index
c) Gender disparity index
d) Geni coefficient10) Absolute and relative deviation
a) The absolute deviation has been defined as the
difference between the two values.
b) Absolute deviation = high value low value
c) Example: number of pupils in region A is 70,000
and region B is 50,000, the absolute deviation
between region A and B in pupil is simple 20,000.
11) The relative deviation, which can be calculated by di-
viding the one value with another values.
a) Relative deviation = value A/value B
b) Thus, the relative deviation in the net enrolment
ratio between region A (85%) and region B (75%)
is: Relative deviation = 85/75 = 1.13
c) It means that the net enrolment ratio for region A
is 1.13 times greater than the net enrolment ratio
in region B.