Zivo Trad Nici Sad
-
Upload
andreja-batricevic -
Category
Documents
-
view
229 -
download
0
Embed Size (px)
Transcript of Zivo Trad Nici Sad
-
8/18/2019 Zivo Trad Nici Sad
1/26
Reconsidering Worlds of Pain: Life in the Working Class(es)Author(s): Thomas J. GormanSource: Sociological Forum, Vol. 15, No. 4 (Dec., 2000), pp. 693-717Published by: SpringerStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/684979 .
Accessed: 10/09/2013 06:48
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Sociological Forum.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:48:52 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=springerhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/684979?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/stable/684979?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=springer
-
8/18/2019 Zivo Trad Nici Sad
2/26
Sociological
Forlum,
Vol.
15,
No.
4, 2000
Reconsidering
Worlds
of
Pain: Life
in
the
Working
Class(es)l
Thomas J. Gorman2
Thispaper
focuses on the
early
goals, past educational
experiences,familial
support,
and
current career
goals of
a
sample
of
80 White
middle-class
and
working-class
parents
in a
medium-sized
northeastern
city
in
the
United States. The
research will
help
determine
whether
members
of
the
working
class have
lived in or still live
in
worlds
of pain.
Middle-class
parents
overwhelmingly
report
having
had
high
goals
and
aspirations
in
high
school, positive
experiences
in
school,
and
supportive
parents
and
role
models in
their
families.
Moreover, they report
being
satisfied
in
their
current occupational positions. The working-class parents present a more
complex pattern:
For
each
of
the
areas
studied-early
goals,
schooling,
familial
support,
and
job
satisfaction and
future
goals-some
of
the
working-class
respondents
report better
experiences than the
others.
A
more inclusive
sampling strategy
proved
useful
in
this
study in
documenting
the varied
life
experiences
and
attitudes
found
among
members
of
the
working class. These
findings provide
support
for and
modification
of
Rubin's
(1976,
1994) portraits
of
the
working
class.
KEY
WORDS: social
class;
families; parental
attitudes.
'An earlier
version
of
this
paper,
based on
the author's doctoral
dissertation
(State
University
of
New York
at
Stony
Brook),
was
presented at
the
Eastern
Sociological
Society annual
meeting
in
Philadelphia,
PA,
1995.
I
want to
thank
Robert
Zussman,
Ivan
Chase, and
Dana
Bramel
for
their
helpful
comments on
my
doctoral
dissertation. I
want to
thank
Kenneth A.
Feldman for
his invaluable
comments on
both
my
doctoral
dissertation and
earlier drafts of
this
paper.
'Joint
Appointment,
Department of
Social
Sciences,
Queensborough
Community College,
Bayside, NY 11364/Department of
Sociology, Queens
College, Flushing, New
York 11367.
693
()884-8971/()()/12()()-()693$18.()()/()
(?)
20()( Plcnum
Publishing
Corporation
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:48:52 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
-
8/18/2019 Zivo Trad Nici Sad
3/26
694
Gorman
INTRODUCTION
Research on the effects of social class on families in the United States
has produced conflicting results. Some studies suggest that members of the
working class live in worlds of pain, experience hidden injuries of class,
see their chances of
upward mobility as slim, and resist the educational
establishment. Other studies suggest that the working class-in becoming
more like the middle class in many ways value education and are raising
their educational
aspirations
in
response to a changing economy.
In
Worlds of Pain-a classic sociological study Rubin (1976) reported
that the lives and
memories of working-class Americans were filled with
pain: unfulfilled dreams; boring social lives; miserable jobs; and marriages
offering
little
personal growth. These
men
and women received the short
end
of the
American dream. At the same
time, Wilmott and Young's (1973)
study suggested that working-class lives would come to resemble the middle-
class norm over time. As
it
has
turned
out,
later research found indications
of middle-class and
working-class
families
living side-by-side, earning equiv-
alent
salaries,
and
frequenting
similar
leisure
establishments
(Halle, 1984).
Although
some earlier studies of social
class
in
America (Kahl, 1953;
Ko-
marovsky, 1962, Howell, 1972) highlighted the differences within working-
class
culture, many
later
portrayals
of
working-class
families
and culture
have
taken
either
a world's
of
pain
or
middle-class achiever
approach.
The lives of members
of the
working-class
are
more complex than previous
studies
suggest.
It is
possible
that the
conflicting
research
findings
reflect
the
reality
of
different
segments
of
the
working
class.
This
paper
will
help clarify
the
conflicting
research
findings
noted
above. The
paper
focuses
on a
sample
of
eighty
white middle-class and
working-class parents
in
a medium-sized northeastern
city
to determine
whether Rubin's
(1976, 1994) portraits
of members of the
working
class
living
in
worlds of pain
still are valid
today.
In
comparing my
research to
Rubin's work I must emphasize that I do not explore all of the same
aspects
of
family
life
that Rubin studied.
This
research
only
looks at
those
experiences
related
to the
respondents' early goals; past
educational
experi-
ences and familial
support
for
schooling,
and future
occupations;
current
job
satisfaction
and future
goals. Also,
middle-class
parents
are included
in
the
study
for
comparative purposes.
In
her
research,
Rubin interviewed
a small number of middle-class
respondents,
but she did not
report many
of
her
findings;
the
inclusion of
a similar
number of middle-class
parents
in
my sample helps put working-class
culture and
family
life
in
perspective.
Previous research of this type has been limited to highly paid men
(Halle, 1984),
convenience
samples
drawn
from church
registers (Komarov-
sky, 1962),
full snowball
samples (Rubin, 1976,
Sennett and
Cobb, 1972),
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:48:52 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
-
8/18/2019 Zivo Trad Nici Sad
4/26
Reconsidering
Worlds of Pain
695
and
samples with
only
a
few
cases
(Howell,
1972).
Although
my
sample
includes a few
individuals who were
drawn
by
means
of
a snowball
technique, my sampling methodology was meant to ensure a fairlyrepresen-
tative cross
section of
a medium-sized
northeastern
city.
This more
inclusive
sampling
strategy proved useful
in
documenting
the
varied life
experiences
and
attitudes found
among
members
of
the
working
class.
RELEVANT
LITERATURE
ON
WORKING-CLASS
FAMILIES
Rubin
(1976)
described
the
working-class families
she
studied
as
living
in worlds of pain. These working-class couples married young and be-
came
parents
shortly
after
taking
their
vows, putting extra
pressure on the
relationships.
According to
Rubin,
socialization
patterns
kept
these
men
and women
in their
respective
roles,
hindering
their
personal
growth and
ability
to
explore
new
lifestyles.
These
working-class
couples worked
hard
and
expected
rewards,
but
received
few
of
them. The
husband's
job
proved
alienating and
usually did not
provide
enough income for
the
family to
escape
its
financial
condition.
Furthermore,
the
couples'
interpersonal lives
were
marked
by
a lack
of
intimacy,
communication,
and
sharing; and their
social lives
and
leisure
time were
found to be
mundane.
Although Rubin
pointed
out that
some members
of the
working class
lived
settled
lives,
she
argued that their lives
were
filled with
poverty,
violence,
uncertainty
and
pain.
In
her
recent research on
working-class
families,
Rubin
(1994) notes
positive
changes that have
taken place in
working-class
families
men
and
women
marrying and
parenting later
in
life, and
women
enjoying
their paid
employment
outside the
family-but
finds
working
class
families
still
living
in
worlds of
pain. In
fact, she
suggests
that
working-class
families today
may
even
live
a
more
painful
existence-living
on
a
faultline
due to
the
shift in the economy from a manufacturing base to a service orientation,
and to the
changes
in
traditional
family
values.
The
one
place where
many
members
of the
working
class
once
found
dignity
the
workplace
now
offers
them
low-wage
service sector
jobs and
corporate
downsizing. Ac-
cording
to
Rubin, this
downward
mobility
is
the reason
why
we
see a
rise in
white
working-class
individuals
venting their
anger at
minorities
and
immigrants.
An
important
study
of
working-class
families by
Komarovsky
(1962)
provided
evidence
suggesting that
while the
majority of
working-class hus-
bands and wives expected little from each other, were not close and did
not
communicate, some
working-class
couples were
still
happy even
though
they
did not
communicate.
In
addition, she
found that
as
many
working-
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:48:52 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
-
8/18/2019 Zivo Trad Nici Sad
5/26
696 Gorman
class couples described their marriages as happy as unhappy. Although
Komarovsky found that her working-class respondents' lives were painful
(husbands who blame themselves for their perceived occupational failure
and who are spending most of their time with their friends while the wives
spent most of their time around female relatives and friends), she noted
that certain factors can make for many variations on the theme: length of
the
marriage, sexual fulfillment, income level, and the educational back-
ground of each spouse. These factors, she argued, can make for a happy
or painful interpersonal arrangement.
Other
research has taken
a
social-psychological approach
to the
impact
of
social class on families. Kohn (1969), for example, argued that parents
know from their workplace experiences the skills and education their chil-
dren will need; working-class parents teach traits such as conformity, punc-
tuality,
and
obedience
while
middle-class parents try
to
instill other traits
in
their children such as independence, creativity, and self actualization.
Working-class individuals, from this perspective, are seen as being ambiva-
lent about the benefits of a college education. These parents want their
children
to have what
they did not
have-a
college education (Connell
et
al., 1982)
but
disrespect
the kind
of
work that the
college degree
will
prepare their children for. In short, working-class parents must prepare their
children for
work
the parents disrespect; this is the key
to
understanding the
hidden injuries of class (Sennett and Cobb, 1972).
Hard
Living on Clay Streetportrayed different segments
of the
working
class. Although
Howell
(1972) recognized
that
working-class
life
experi-
ences
fall
on a continuum
from hard
living
to settled
living
he
focused most
of his
attention
on a hard
living family.
He concluded that
hard living families tend to
be
composed of
seven elements:
(1) heavy
drinking, (2) marital instability, (3) toughness (profanity
and
violence), (4)
political alienation, (5) rootlessness, (6) present-time orientation,
and
(7)
a
strong
sense
of individualism.
According
to
Howell,
as one moves
away
from the hard living toward the settled living end of the continuum
one
finds less
of
these seven
elements.
In another
insightful study
of
the
working class,
Halle
(1984) argues
that there
are
elements
of
a
distinct
working-class
life
experience job
opportunities,
educational
level, family origin,
leisure tastes and
self-
esteem but
he
feels that
the dissimilarities between
the
middle
class
and
the
working
class
have been
exaggerated. Although they
are
proud
of
being
''working men, the highly paid
blue-collar workers
he
studied
lived
in
middle-class
neighborhoods
and earned as
much or more
money
as their
white-collar,
middle-class
neighbors.
One
of the
problems
with
earlier
stud-
ies of this research
topic,
Halle
argues,
is that
they
have
included
families
where the wife
stayed
at
home with a
young
child.
These tend to
be
the
hardest
years
of
marriage, thereby exacerbating
the
pain.
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:48:52 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
-
8/18/2019 Zivo Trad Nici Sad
6/26
Reconsidering Worlds of Pain
697
Stacey
(1991)
has
argued
that
working-class
families,
battered
by
an
economy that now
requires them to have at
least two
(low)
wage
earners
combined
with the
drug
and alcohol
abuse that
ensues,
may
be
heading
toward
a time when the
permeable
boundary
between
'hard' and 'settled'
blue-collar
family
life
threatens to become
more of a
one-way
street
(p.
257). She
found that
many
working-class women seek
safety
in
these
turbulent times
by
retreating
to
patriarchal
marriages
and/or to
evangeli-
cal
religious
movements,
but
noted that
the
postmodern
family form
does offer
hope
to
working-class
women for
egalitarian
gender
relation-
ships.
Husbands and
wives
in
working
class
families have had to
(re)negoti-
ate their
prospective
gender roles under
intense
pressure
in
a
changing
economy.
In focusing on the different educational experiences of middle- and
working-class
women,
Finley
(1992)
shows that
these women
differ little
in
their
goals and
aspirations,
but
they
do
have
different
educational out-
comes
based on their
family resources.
Working-class
women,
she
argues,
want
to attend
college after
high school-even
with a
history of painfill
educational
experiences-but have to
delay
that
decision for
lack of
ade-
quate
transportation,
tuition,
and
room and
board.
Furthermore, once re-
moved from the
competition,
women
from the
working class find it
increas-
ingly difficult to
return to
college at
a later
date due
to those
same
financial constraints.
The
data from
my (intensive
and
lengthy)
interviews
suggest
support
for and
modification of
the
findings
in
the
relevant literature.
DATA
COLLECTION
The
sample
for
this
study was drawn
from an
old,
medium-sized,
northeastern
(U.S.A.) city
(population:
approximately
100,000). Old
City
(name changed to protect confidentiality) had been a magnet for immigrants
during
the 19th
century;
industries such
as
trade,
transportation,
foundries,
lumber, and
railroads
dominated
the
landscape.
These
immigrants
built
and lived in
ethnic
enclaves
that,
to
some
degree,
still
exist
today. (A
few
of these
neighborhoods are
part of
the
present
study.)
Some
of the
neighborhoods
remain stable
demographically while
others
are in
flux.
Many
of
the
respondents
are
worried
about
crime,
drugs, and
racial
minorit-
ies.
Today, the
area's three
main
employers-the
public,
service,
and
wholesale/retail
sectors
keep the
unemployment
rate
relatively low
(ap-
proximately 5%). The
county boasts a
vast and
prestigious
higher
educa-
tional
system and has a
large
number of
Ph.D.'s
per
100,000
residents. The
large number
of
students
in
the
area
give parts of
the city a
college town
atmosphere
(as
well as
pumping up
the
local
economy).
The
housing
ranges
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:48:52 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
-
8/18/2019 Zivo Trad Nici Sad
7/26
698
Gorman
from single-family ranch and
colonial style homes in the middle-class neigh-
borhoods to two- and three-story (multi-family) row houses, many with
top and bottom porches, in the
working-class neighborhoods.
A
stratified cluster sampling
strategy allowed me to use United States
Census
Tract
data
(indicating years of schooling completed and occupation)
to select the
census tracts
in
Old
City that optimized my chances of finding
middle-class and working-class
respondents. The Primary Sampling Units
(PSU) were composed of census
tracts of comparable demographic charac-
teristics from which I randomly selected enough city blocks to complete
my sample; I visited every
census tract and spoke to Old City residents
about census tract socioeconomic
characteristics. When I did not attain the
desired yield (five respondents) for a designated block, I resampled the
balance of that block until I reached a yield of five respondents or ran out
of
dwelling
units.
I
left an
introductory
letter at
each dwelling unit and
returned a few days later to ask
the occupant whether s/he, or any other
parent
in
the
household,
would like to
participate
in the
study. (I
achieved
a
response
rate of
approximately 56%.)
In order to minimize
bias,
I
approached
the
respondents
and conducted
the interviews at different times
during
the
week, and,
as
much
as
possible,
interviewed the respondents
privately, free from the distractions of family
life (a few interviews were
conducted with the spouse present).
I
interviewed
only one parent from each family. Interviewing both parents simultaneously
presents the potential problem of
one person contaminating
the
other's
responses, while returning a
second time to interview the other parent
assumes
that one
partner
has not
spoken
to the other
in
the interim.
Al-
though
I
was not able to determine differences
in
attitudes between
a
husband and a wife, I was able to
sample men and women who had different
life experiences. (The sample
was
composed
of
equal
numbers
of
men and
women) Furthermore,
I
kept
track
of the
respondent's spouse's (significant
other) social
class
and educational attainment
to
determine
if
a
respondent
whose spouse differed on the social class indicator had different attitudes
and
life
experiences
from
a
respondent
whose
spouse
had
a similar social
class indicator
(see
Komarovsky, 1962; Oppenheimer, 1982; Halle, 1984;
and
Stacey, 1991).
Twelve
working-class
and
three
middle-class
respondents
had spouses
who
differed
on the social
class indicator.
Although
I
acknowl-
edge
the
importance
of
investigating
the intersection
of
race
and
class,
I
focused
on
one
segment
of the
population-White working-
and middle-
class
parents.
I
did, however,
include
a few
non-White
respondents
because
they
were
randomly selected.
Halle
(1984)
has
argued
that much of
the research
on
working-class
families has looked at
families
in
the
early stages
of the life
cycle,
a
proce-
dure
that
almost
guarantees
a
sample living
in
worlds
of
pain. My
re-
search-with
equal
numbers
of
middle- and
working-class parents (who
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:48:52 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
-
8/18/2019 Zivo Trad Nici Sad
8/26
Reconsidering
Worlds
of Pain
699
had at
least
one
child
in
either
elementary
or
high
school)
at a
similar
life-
cycle
stage-was intended to
address
this criticism.
(See
the
Appendix
for
a
breakdown
of
the
demographic characteristics
of
the
sample.)
Each interview took
approximately two hours to
complete
and was
tape recorded. All
quotations
in
the text are
verbatim,
but some have
been
condensed for
easier
reading.
At
the end of each
quotation
in
the
text,
a
notation lists
the
respondent's
age, gender,
educational level, and
occupa-
tion
(a
few
respondents'
occupations
were
changed
to
equivalent
occupa-
tions
to ensure
confidentiality).
My
definition
of
social
class
is
fairly
consistent with much
of the work on
social class
differences
(Halle, 1984;
Lareau, 1989).
I
coded the
respondent's
social class on the basis of
his/her
occupation.
Working-class parents
in
the
sample held the following Blue-Collar/Lower-White-Collar Occupations:
Skilled,
Semiskilled,
Unskilled
Laborers;
Transportation
Workers;
and
Lower-Level
Sales,
Clerical,
and Service
Occupations. Middle-class
parents
in
the
sample held the
following
White-Collar
Occupations:
Professionals;
Middle and
Upper-Level
Managers; High-Level
Civil
Servants;
Academics;
High-Level Sales
and
Administrative
Positions; and Small
Business
Owners.
Wright's
(1978)
conceptual
model was
utilized
when an
occupational status
was
ambiguous. Social class
in
this model is based
upon
economic ownership
and
the
amount
of
control over
the
physical
means
of
production and the
labor power of others.
Some caveats should be
kept
in
mind.
My
research was
conducted
in
a
city;
suburban
residents
were
not
included.
Many
of
my
respondents
liked
the
city and the
multicultural
experiences it offers. I
am quite
certain that
I
would not
find this
attitude
prevalent
in
the
suburbs. It
should also be
kept
in
mind that
the interviews
were conducted
during the 10-month
period from
November
1991
through September
1992.
During this time
the
United
States
was
in
the
midst of
economic
recession-affecting both
blue-collar
and
white-collar workers which
prompted the media
to carry
stories extolling the benefits of riding out the recession by going to college
or
graduate
school.
It has been
argued
that
these
changes
in
attitude
could
be an
outcome
of
deindustrialization
(Weis, 1990).
In
addition, the economic
conditions and
media accounts
might
also have
influenced the
attitudes of
particular respondents toward the
future.
FINDINGS
Early
Goals
What
did the
respondents
want for
their future
when
they were
in
high school? How
did
they envision
the coming
years?
Were the dreams
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:48:52 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
-
8/18/2019 Zivo Trad Nici Sad
9/26
700
Gorman
of middle-class respondents
different from the dreams of working-class
respondents? The working-class
respondents that Rubin (1976) interviewed
painted a depressing picture of youthful goals and aspirations. Faced with
poverty
and a lack of positive role models, working-class males did not
look beyond their automobiles, while working-class
females dreamed only
of
marrying princes.
Consequently, working-class
youth did not think about
college
or
professional
careers: the men went
to work in low level blue-
collar
occupations; the
women got married. These are the only paths, Rubin
(1976) argued, that can give working-class youth
a sense of control over
their
lives, independent
living quarters, and an
adult identity. Middle-class
youth, meanwhile,
are
surrounded by professional parents
who
can
offer
not only the dreams of a bright future, but who can also offer the social
reality and financial
means to support those dreams.
In
the present
study approximately a quarter
of the working-class
respondents report
that either a job or marriage was utmost in their minds
at the time of
high
school
graduation.
For women of this subgroup, marriage
preoccupied their thoughts:
At that
age
I
just
wanted to
get
married and
have
kids, and (laughs) that's what
I
thought.
I
wasn't interested
in
any type
of
career
or
anything
like
that
back
then.
(Sad laughter)
I
don't know
why
I
thought
that. Didn't think
I
would
have to
support myself.-Age: 32, female, cashier,
HS
plus
secretarial
school.
Another woman
explains
why
she
was
preoccupied
with
marriage:
No. No.
I
figured things
were
going
to fall
into
my
lap. (Laughs)
We were
more
or less raised
that education was not
important
for
the female.
My
mother
never.
She
was
always
the one home with the kids. She didn't start
working
until
we
were
in
High School.-Age: 34, female, pharmacy clerk,
HS.
Basically, these working-class
women are saying that their traditional gen-
der role socialization did
not
prepare
them for
any particular
educational
or
occupational goals.
One
working-class
woman,
whose husband has
a
four-year college degree and is a middle-level manager in a government
office,
thinks that he would
have been a better candidate to
interview
about matters
such as education
and careers. The self-esteem
problems
that she
displays
in her comment
may
well have their
roots
in
traditional
gender
role socialization.
For the
men of this
subgroup
of
the
working class, working
and
making
money
were the main attractions. One
man,
who was
making
more
money
than
his
dad
at the time
of
high
school
graduation,
remarks:
I
knew
I was destined
to
be
a worker. I worked
in a
gas
station two
years during
high school and three years after that I went to work at the airport as a mechanic.
I
thought
about
going
to
college
for
psychology,
but
I
already
had bills
coming
in.
So I wanted a
car. So
along
comes
responsibility.
I
guess
(I had) responsibility
too
early (said sadly).-Age:
35,
male, carpenter,
HS.
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:48:52 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
-
8/18/2019 Zivo Trad Nici Sad
10/26
Reconsidering Worlds of Pain
701
This
man is
upset that he had to
shoulder
responsibilities
at
such an
early
age.
Although
adolescent boys
of
both
classes
face
cultural
expectations,
financial constraints seem to present distinctive problems for working-class
males. In a
consumer
culture,
the
lack of financial resources
available to
working-class
children
puts extra
pressure
on their
time
for school
work
and
their plans for
college;
they
are
not
permitted what
may
be seen
as
the
extended
adolescence that
many
middle-class
children
enjoy.
Another quarter of
the
working-class
sample
reports
that
they
did not
have
any goals. For
one
woman,
the
idea of
having a future
goal at
that
point
in her life
seems
almost
ludicrous:
I
was
going
to
[the state
high school vocational
educational
program]
for
hairdress-
ing, and that's when I got pregnant. I didn't finish. I stayed in school for a while.
I
really
didn't
think much back
then-no
goals-What
did I see
myself
doing?
Nothing
(incredulously)-Age: 35,
female, p/t
secretary/clerk. GED
She seems
to
be
asking
whether
she was
supposed
to have a
future
goal.
The
meaning of
concepts such
as future
goals
and
success are
class
specific. It is
obvious that some
members
of
the
working
class are
not
thinking about
future
goals,
or,
if
they
are,
they
are
defining them differ-
ently
from
middle-class individuals.
Other
working-class
respondents see
their lack
of
goals
in
high
school
tied to
different
problems:
I really didn't have (any goals). There are some personal reasons that went on in
my
childhood
that
kept
me
back
from
being
motivated: I was
very
into
alcohol
and
drugs
at that time. I
was a full blown
alcoholic
all
through high
school.
I'm a
recovering alcoholic
for
ten
years.
I wanted to
play;
I wasn't
motivated at
all.-Age:
35,
female, LPN, HS
plus
LPN
school-now
taking
community college courses.
This
respondent
continues, with tears in her
eyes, to
say
that most of
her
friends were
into alcohol
at
that time.
Alcohol and
drugs
are more
prevalent
in
these
working-class life
histories
than
for
the
middle-class
life
histories;
childhood
memories for some of
these
working-class
respondents
are
painful:
(In
the)
ninth
grade
my
life went
nutso. I was a
juvenile
delinquent, basically.
After
high school
drug
abuse
and alcohol
abuse
took
off.
(Goals?)
No. I
did not.
I
was
extremely confused. I
went the
rebellious
route.-Age: 36,
female,
resident
counselor,
now
taking
college
courses.
It is
interesting to note
that the
above
three
respondents are
female.
Al-
though adolescents of
both classes
doubtlessly face
self-esteem
problems,
working-class adolescent
females
may not have
the
opportunity
to help
improve their
self-esteem
through higher
education
(Finley,
1992).
One
working-class
male
recounts
that when
he
was
in
high school a
person did not have to think about goals and aspirations:
I
really
didn't think
much
about
it.
I
didn't care
then. You
could
walk down
the
street and
get
a
good
job,
pay you good
money.
If
that
didn't
work out, you
could
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:48:52 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
-
8/18/2019 Zivo Trad Nici Sad
11/26
702
Gorman
walk to the next door and they
would give you a job
there.-Age:
49, male, truck
driver,
1
year of college.
He is angry that the rules of the game have changed. He remembers a time
when
one did not need a
college education for a good job. The women
who only wanted to get married
after high school sounded a similar theme:
they did not think they needed a college education back then. Although
it probably was not as easy to
acquire a good job as this man makes it
sound, fluctuating market forces
may influence the goals and aspirations
of
different generations (Stacey,
1991; Weis, 1990).
Several (13%) working-class
respondents had some goals and aspira-
tions, but lacked the confidence to pursue them:
Believe it or not, I wanted to become a nurse. I know you had to have an education,
you had to go to college. You
know, I wasn't the type
of
person . .
.
that could
see
myself going to college.-Age:
43, female, waitress,
less than
HS.
A
truck driver recalls an unfulfilled dream:
I wanted to
be
a
veterinarian. It's
almost
like
being
a
doctor. God, I
would
love
to do that.
I thought I'd go
to . .
. take
the
two-year animal husbandry course at
Cornell
and start
that
way
but . .
.
I kind of
felt that I'm not college material. So
I didn't
go
to
college (voice
fades).-Age: 47, male,
truck
driver,
HS.
The relative lack of
self-confidence among the working-class parents is a
key to understanding the difference between the lives of working-class
parents
and the
lives
of
the middle-class
parents. Indeed, previous
research
(Rubin, 1976; Sennett
and
Cobb, 1972)
has
suggested
that the material
conditions dealt to the
working
class
in
a
capitalist society
undermine the
working class person's feeling
of
self-worth. Throughout
this
paper many
of the
working-class respondents
talk about their
low
self-esteem
in
light
of
socio-cultural
constraints:
gender
socialization;
limited
resources;
lack
of information
concerning
careers
and
higher education;
lack of role
models;
and cultural
expectations
regarding higher
education.
Even when working-class respondents had high aspirations and goals
(slightly
over one
quarter) they
had trouble
reaching
them
due
to hurdles
and roadblocks that either have been
planned
for or
are not encountered
in
middle-class
lives:
I wanted to
go
on to
college
but
my
father had two heart attacks and there
was
no
way
we could afford it. I wasn't that
knowledgeable
about student loans at the
time.-Age: 34, male, unemployed
bridge painter,
HS.
Some members
of the
working-class,
such as this
man,
have
aspirations
that are similar
to the
aspirations
of
many
middle-class
individuals,
but
extra hurdles and roadblocks-either planned for or not encountered in
middle-class lives-make
them harder to attain.
Most
(82%)
middle-class
respondents,
male and
female, report
that at
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:48:52 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
-
8/18/2019 Zivo Trad Nici Sad
12/26
Reconsidering
Worlds of Pain
703
high school
graduation
they
had
high-level goals
and assumed
they
were
going to attend college:
I
think
I
was
thinking
along
the
lines
of a social worker.
It
was
always
assumed
that I would
go
to
college.
I don't think it was talked about. There was never
any
question
that I was
going
to
go
to
college.
I'm sure
it
was
my parents.
It was the
way the family was
structured. I never remember ever
considering
that when
I
turn
18 I'll go
get
a
job.-Age: 44, male, accountant, BA.
College
probably
will not be an
issue
for
his children either. This is
quite
a different
story
from the
working-class
parents
who
not
only
did not
assume
they
were
going
to
attend
college,
but
actually
assumed
they
were
not
going to attend
college.
The
seed
of
the idea that one has a
chance of
attending college must be planted before the roots of success can grow. It
is
interesting
that the
middle-class
parents
in
this
study
tend to feel that
they
had assumed
they
were
going
to
attend
college
because of the
way
they
were
raised;
written
between the lines
is
a belief
that families are at
fault when their children do not
go
to
college.
Even
so,
middle-class women
are not immune from
cultural
expectations:
I look
back. I'll tell
you
a
disappointment.
No
one told me when
I
was
younger
that I could have
gone
to law
school. No one
suggested
that
to
me;
it never dawned
on
me and
I'm very sorry about that. But
my parents
wanted my brother to go to
law school. My brother is two years younger than me.-Age: 56, female, retired
teacher,
MA.
In fact,
many of the
middle-class women
complain that women from their
generation
had to
choose from
only
two
careers-nursing
and
teaching.
Newman
(1988) has made note of
the tendency for succeeding
generations
of
women to have
different
perceptions of their
occupational
options.
A
small
percentage
(15%)
of
middle-class
respondents had
experiences
that resembled the
working
class
pattern of
having had
few
goals
at the
time of
high
school
graduation;
there are
no clear-cut distinctions between
these
two
groups.
Interestingly,
these tend
to be the
middle-class
respon-
dents who have some of
the
lowest-level
occupations
in
the
middle-class
sample
and whose
parents
are
working
class:
No. I
really didn't. I didn't have an
educational goal at
all because I was just .
I
wasn't nuts
about school.
I
didn't
have a desire for college at that
time. As far
as
education,
I have to
start
doing
something.
We
just went through
a forced
management
plan
and one of the
criteria
they
focused on
was education.-Age:
39,
male,
lower-level
project director
(started
in
mailroom), HS.
Again, this respondent realizes that the rules of the game have changed,
acknowledging
the
impact
a
college degree would
have
for
his career. He
is
considering following his
company's
requirements.
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:48:52 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
-
8/18/2019 Zivo Trad Nici Sad
13/26
704
Gorman
Schooling
Intensive studies of
working-class families, whose members have usu-
ally indicated an aversion to discussing unhappy
experiences, have only
scratched the surface
of the deep feelings associated with memories of
schooling (Halle, 1984;
Sennett and Cobb, 1972). An individual's early
school
experiences can
lay the foundation for his or her future attitudes
toward education; and
a
parent's current attitude
toward education may
have an effect on his or her children's decision to
attend college. In her
research, Rubin (1976)
noted the discomfort that
members of the working
class experience
when
looking back at their schooling;
they were reminded
of all they didn't learn, making them feel inadequate
and deficient (p.
127). Working-class respondents in research recall four times as many
negative accounts of schooling
as compared to the middle-class respondents.
But, more important for this study, my working-class
respondents are split
in their assessment of their
schooling; some accounts
are more favorable
than others.
Many
working-class respondents focus on problems they
had
with their self-confidence:
I was one of
your
lower
nobodies-I
had
very
little self-esteem-didn't
learn
much
of
anything.-Age: 35,
female, unemployed clerk,
HS.
A
few respondents
cannot decide whom to blame.
For
example
one
work-
ing-class woman said:
(School)
was
boring.
I
couldn't sit still for six hours. I
felt
I
could deal with life
without
an
education
which
I found
out was
wrong.
I
just
didn't
like school-no
one took the
time (to
explore her learning problem )-wanted
to be out there
getting
that
job.
I didn't want to hear it. I
felt a little low
seeing
kids
graduate
and
making
a little
better
life than I had. I felt I was
lower
class.
My
father told me
if
you
want
something you
have to work. I can't blame them because
I was
stupid.-
Age: 43, female,
waitress,
less
than
HS.
In
this account, one
can hear the hidden injuries of class-a
class
system
that makes
some
feel a little
low. A
class
system
that cloaks its
impact
on
individuals;
this woman does not
know where to
place
the
blame
for
her
life
situation-the schools,
her own lack
of
intelligence
and lack
of
deferred
gratification,
or her father.
Some
working-class respondents
vent
their
anger directly
at
the school
system:
I
hated
school because I couldn't
stand
sitting
there. I
was a
depressed teenager.
School didn't
fare me well. I never had
anyone
in school behind me
pushing
me.
Never went
to class-went to one class.
Nothing
was ever done about
it. In
high
school
we never had
clothes,
kind of
wore the
same
pants every day-very
de-
pressing. (The academic)
track kind of made
you
feel not
important.
Learned
about
drugs.
Learned how to
skip school, drop
out.
And
that's
what I
did.-Age: 35,
female, p/t secretary, GED.
It is hard to
stay
in
school faced
with
shabby
clothes, drugs,
low
self-esteem,
and
uncaring
teachers
and administrators.
This woman
did, indeed,
live
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:48:52 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
-
8/18/2019 Zivo Trad Nici Sad
14/26
Reconsidering
Worlds
of
Pain
705
in
worlds
of
pain.
This is the
working-class
existence that Rubin has so
elegantly portrayed.
Still, just
over half of the
working-class respondents
had
positive experi-
ences to
report; they
loved
reading, studying,
and
learning:
I
liked reading.
I would read
anything.
I
learned
that there
was
a lot out there to
do-doctor, lawyer-whatever.
There is a
possibility
of
doing it.-Age: 29,
female,
clerk, presently
in
college at night.
I was
always
confident.
I
never felt
I
would
fail;
I
mean
my
dad
taught
me
in the
sixth
grade
to read
books when
I
get
them. There were times
when
you
don't have
anything to do, you pick up a history book and read it. He told me in
two
weeks
you'll be doing your homework without referring
to the
book.-Age: 35, male,
carpenter, HS.
Note how these respondents do not talk about the success they achieved
in
school,
but the love of
learning they acquired (Gorman, 1998a).
These
are a few
examples
from
the
sample illustrating
the
working-class
lives
(and
outlooks on life) that Rubin did
not
emphasize. (She mentioned that some
members
of the
working
class
lead
'settled'
lives.) Indeed,
these
are a
series of
positive working-class narratives, although nothing
like the
glowing
reports of most (67%) middle-class parents.
Most middle-class parents' memories
of
schooling are associated with
all the social amenities that can
bolster
self-confidence:
getting good grades
and
perks ; being
in the advanced
track; participating
in
extracurricular
events; having academically oriented friends; and having caring teachers
and administrators. A chemist remarks:
I liked school a lot as a kid.
I
always
did well.
It
was a
college prep high
school. I
got
teachers who
were pretty
innovative
(in elementary school). I
knew
I
was
going
to
college.
I
think I learned a lot-a
pretty
broad education.
Always got good
grades
and
I
did extracurricular: ski
club,
math
club,
student council. I was also
in
the national honor
society.
I can't think of one
person
I associated
with in
high
school that didn't
go
on to
college.-Age: 34, female, chemist,
BS.
A nurse
studying
to be a teacher
comments:
I found a real nice group of friends to be with. They tended to be the intellectual
crowd in
school;
I needed
that,
so the
intellectual stimulation in the
classroom
carried over into the
social life. Color
guard,
that was a
big thing
for
me, eventually
got promoted
to
captain. I (belonged to)
the
National Honor Society, the Russian
Club,
the
German
Club,
and a
social
justice
club.
I
was
considered
a
good student;
in
high
school
I
was in
Regents (track), I think it was an Honors Regents. I was
expected
to excel.
(I was) exposed
to
more
opportunities
than kids in other tracks.
In
elementary
school
(I had)
a
certain amount of self-confidence
probably
bolstered
by
the
grades
I would
get,
the
perks
I would
get,
the stars
on
the charts and in
high
school there was
enough
self-confidence to know what I didn't want to
participate
in.-Age: 37, female, religious
education coordinator
(previously a nurse), BA,
studying
for
MA.
She had
enough
self-confidence
to
stay away
from the
debilitating
effects
of
peer pressure.
The school
experiences
of
most
middle-class respon-
dents-college track, high grades, clubs,
and honor
societies-are
in
stark
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:48:52 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
-
8/18/2019 Zivo Trad Nici Sad
15/26
706
Gorman
contrast to the school
experiences
of many working-class
respondents-
shabby
clothes, low self-esteem,
uncaring
teachers and administrators, and
dropping
out. These
accounts suggest that social
class still is a
major force
in the
lives of these
postmodern families.
While
working-class
respondents complain
about events that left
their
basic
educational needs
wanting, some
middle-class respondents view
their
schooling
through
a critical
lens,
feeling
that a better
education could have
supplemented
their
current
prestigious occupation or
specialized skills:
I
don't think it was very
good on the whole. I'm critical
of it. I don't feel
I walked
away
from high school
particularly well equipped either
to handle college or just
equipped with the type
of knowledge to
get on in the world. I think it
could have
been more
intensive, could have
been better steeped in
fundamentals.
To this day
I
still have a hard time
with grammar. I have a good feel
for it-I'm a
lawyer-but
formal grammar: I don't know a participle from whatever. I wouldn't know it to
give you a
definition of it. I just think
that my generation
as a whole was the victim
of the
changing educational
philosophy.-Age:
35,
male, lawyer, law
degree.
To lament not
being able to define a
participle, while
understandable,
is quite different from
the
anger expressed by a
couple
of the
working-
class
respondents
who
complain
that
they did not receive
help
with
the
drug
and
learning problems that
contributed to their
decision
to
drop
out
of
high school.
Family Support
for
Schooling and Future
Occupations
What kinds of
support
were there from other
family
members
for
the
working-class respondents and to what
degree did their
parents
influence
their career and
educational
goals?
Did
they
live in
worlds
of
pain,
or was
their world more
settled? Rubin
(1976, 1994)
has
reported
that the
working-
class families she encountered did
not
push
their children to
go
to
college
because
they
did
not
want
to lose their children to an
alien
way
of
life.
Again,
there were
as
many working-class
respondents
who
remember
hav-
ing parental
support
and
positive
role models as those who
remember
having
little or no
support
and
negative
role
models.
I
am
not
placing
the
blame
on
working-class
families for their
children's
problems.
Members
of
these families are battered
during
their
search
for
dignity (and
self-esteem)
in
a socio-economic
system
that
often
excludes them from the
resources
that
would form
a basis
for
that
dignity;
sometimes that
struggle
takes its
toll
on
the
family.
Was hearth and
home conducive to educational excel-
lence?
For
a little over half of the
working-class respondents
the answer
is,
no:
No. The common phrase was: Whatever makes you happy. Their whole life was
an
example
to me of
things
not to
do,
not to
get into,
from
watching
them
I
knew
not
to do the
alcohol,
the
drugs;
and
get
an
education.-Age: 23, male,
health
aide,
1 1/2
years
of
community college.
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:48:52 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
-
8/18/2019 Zivo Trad Nici Sad
16/26
Reconsidering Worlds of Pain 707
Other working-class respondents
also
say
that
watching
their
parents
taught
them
what not to
do. This
may
mean that these
respondents'
children will lead
lives devoid
of
alcohol and
drugs
while
being
full of
academic
achievement.
Many
of
those
working-class respondents
who did receive
positive
support
from their
parents report they
rebelled
against
their
parents'
wishes:
My
father wanted
me
to
get
involved in
computers.
When I was
eighteen
I started
to rebel
against my
father. It didn't seem fair
that he
was
deciding
what the rest
of
my
life
was going
to be. I
guess my way
of
rebelling
was to
put
off school
(college)
for
a
year and then I just
didn't
go back.-Age: 34, female, clerk, HS.
They always
wanted me to
go
to
college,
but
I
don't think the
support
was there
(although)
the
money
was there. I was
rebelling
and
always fighting
with
them.
So,
I
don't think there was
much
direction as far as what do
you
want to do when
you
grow up.-Age: 35, female, LPN, HS plus
LPN
school.
For the most
part
these
respondents
learned
the hard
way, ending up
in
jobs and
in
lifestyles similar to their parents. Even
though sociologists
have
studied
working-class
resistance
at the school site between
middle-class
teachers and
working-class students (Willis, 1977), resistance
to
the educa-
tional
system can, conceivably,
take
place
within the
family (Gorman,
1998b).
The overwhelming majority (65%) of middle-class respondents have
glowing reports of parental support. Some recall never having to be told
about their
parents expectations; they got
the
message by observing
their
parents:
I'll tell
you
a
funny story. (My parents) said, 'you can be whatever
you want,
even
a
garbage man,
as
long
as
you're happy7-I
don't believe that
(laughs) because
I
remember
when I
came home with
a
degree
in
philosophy and
they
said
what can
you
do with a
degree
in
philosophy.
I
never
remember them saying we want you
to
go
to
college. Maybe
it was
just generally
understood
that we would
go
to
college
or I was
just
raised with the
expectation
that I was
going to college. My dad went
to
college.
So
college
was
viewed,
even as a little
kid,
as
education doesn't stop at
high school, you go
on to
college.
When
I
would
be doing my
homework,
he
would
be doing his homework-(It was) osmosis.-Age: 40, male, director state mental
program,
MA.
It has been noted elsewhere (Deverson and Lindsay, 1975) that middle-
class
parents
have the
option
to be more flexible
in
their professed attitudes
toward their
children's future. It
may
be easier to
say
I
don't care what
my
child does as
long
as s/he is
happy
when
you are a successful lawyer
as
opposed
to an
unemployed bridge painter.
For
some middle-class respon-
dents
(and
not heard
in
working-class interviews) there was no option, no
choice,
but to surrender
to their parents' wishes. A
retired teacher recalls:
(My parents
felt
that) you
were
going
to
go to college and get a
job that was going
to
sustain
you
for
the rest of
your
life.
(They said)
we
prefer you be a teacher or
nurse. You
had to
go
to
college, that was the only road open to
you.-Age:
56,
female,
retired
teacher,
MA.
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:48:52 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
-
8/18/2019 Zivo Trad Nici Sad
17/26
708
Gorman
Some
middle-class respondents report giving their own children
the same
choice. Parents who have a college degree may be good role
models for
their children, but when parents feel their children will not succeed, or be
complete without a college degree, a heavy burden is
placed on the
children.
As
an example, one respondent's father was
devastated when
one
of
his sons did not go
to college. It is still believed, based on Kohn's
(1969) research, that
working-class parents instill in their
children values
such
as obedience and
conformity,
while
middle-class parents
instill in their
children values such as flexibility and creativity. These are
the values,
argues
Kohn
(1969) that
parents know their children will need for their
respective positions in the
occupational hierarchy. (Rubin makes
a similar
argument in Worlds of Pain.) By contrast, the present research suggests
that it is
middle-class children who are
socialized to be conformists in order
to fit into bureaucratic
occupational slots (for supporting evidence see
Anyon 1980).
Only
for
middle-class
respondents
with lower-level
occupational posi-
tions (and working-class
parents) did
I
find
unfavorable accounts
of their
parents' support:
My
father wanted us to
go
as
high
as
we
could-he
wanted
us
to
at least
finish
high school,
then
it was your choice. He was
basically,
the
more years
in
school,
the less
money you're going
to earn
in
a lifetime. If
you
flunked a
year
that
meant
that you are going to lose $6,000 because it was one more year not working.-Age:
38, male,
benefits administrative
supervisor, AAS.
This man seems to be
caught between two worlds-working
class and
middle
class. This research has shown that
many years
after the
working-
class
respondents
left
school, they
still often had
painful
memories
of
their
experiences; they
often felt that their
long-term
interests
had been
damaged
by
their
stunted
educational careers.
Current
Jobs
and Future
Goals
In Rubin's
study
most
working-class family
members described
their
current
jobs
and future
goals
in
bleak terms:
boredom; resignation;
and
alienation. When asked about their current
occupation
and future
goals
and
aspirations, working-class respondents
in
the
present study
provide
a
wide
range
of
responses.
On occasion
I did hear
outright despair:
I
go day-by-day.
I'm
a believer in
here
today, gone
tomorrow.
My philosophy
on
life is really bad. I look at life as you are put on earth to wait your turn to die and
while
you're here, you basically just get
a
job
to make
your
life easier while
you
wait
your
turn to die. That's the
way
I
feel.-Age: 40, male,
maintenance,
HS
plus
some
college
in the
Army.
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:48:52 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
-
8/18/2019 Zivo Trad Nici Sad
18/26
Reconsidering Worlds of Pain
709
One man
struggles
with his level of
accomplishments:
(I) just
go along doing
what I'm
doing.
I've
got
no
regrets.
I'm
doing
all
right.
I've
got to stick with (the railroad), I don't want to, but I've got to, nothing else to
do.-Age: 49,
male,
truck
driver,
1
year
college.
Although
this man
is doing all
right,
having
nothing else
to
do
is
a
sad comment on the
perception
of
the current and
future
job
market
opportunities for
blue-collar
workers. Ehrenreich
(1989)
has
noted that
blue-collar workers
are more
likely
to
experience downward
mobility
than
any other occupational
grouping.
A
working-class
woman
talks
about the
future for her
grandson:
(Confidence
in
the
future?)
Not
if
it
keeps going
the
way
it is. I
mean
what
are
they going to do when they get up into their twenties and thirties. My grandchild,
what is
he
going to
do
as far as
education; what's
going
to
be there for
him.
Inflation,
price of
education,
I
don't see how
young
kids
can
go
to
college. There are
grants
for
those
who
can't afford
(it). Fifteen
thousand dollars
for
the
first
semester;
how
can
anyone
afford to
go.-Age:
43,
female,
waitress,
less than
HS.
This is
another
indication
of
the
perception
of the
possibility
of
upward
mobility
through higher
education
for
members
of
the
working
class.
The most common
response involves a
desire
to return
to
school
to
finish a GED, to
learn a
trade,
or to
take
college-level
coursework. But
as
an
unemployed
bridge painter claims:
I've
always
talked
(about) going
back
to
school,
but
with
the
baby
and
getting
laid
off
the last
couple
of winters-no
way. Intentions
are
all well and
good,
but when
it
comes
right
down to
it
you can
find a
hundred
ways
to
spend
the
money
somewhere
else.-Age: 34, male,
unemployed bridge
painter,
HS
degree.
As these
respondents
vividly
convey,
it
is difficult to
go
back to
school
when
married, with a full-time
job
and
young children.
A
common
lament
among
the
working-class
respondents
is
that
they
did not
attend
college
before
marriage.
It
usually
sounds
simple:
take a few
years
off
after
high
school
graduation to make
some
money,
and
then
return
to
college.
But
as we have just heard, to go back to college is difficult; college is easy to
defer.
How does
the
unemployed bridge
painter see his
future:
Tough
one.
It's
going to take a lot of
change
in
this
country
to
make
for
an
easier
one. I don't see it
happening. They
should start
spending more
money
on
education
rather than
foreign aid. It's all screwed
up.
I'm
scared. I can
just take it a day at
a
time and
hope
for the
best.-Age: 34, male,
unemployed
bridge
painter, HS.
With
this man's
comment
in
mind
it
is not
difficult to
understand why some
of
the
working-class
respondents hesitate
before
responding
to
my
question
regarding future
goals. These
respondents did
not have
many
goals in
high school, these respondents do not have many goals now. There is a
segment
of
the
working class,
however, that has
the
same future
goals
as
the
middle
class,
although
usually burdened
by
problems that
either
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:48:52 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
-
8/18/2019 Zivo Trad Nici Sad
19/26
710
Gorman
have been
planned for or are
not encountered
in middle-class lives.
One
poignant case concerns
a woman who had
to drop out
of college, putting
off her goal of becoming a lawyer because she got married and became
pregnant.
Oh
I
know I'm
going to reach (my goal) at the cost
of not paying so much attention
to
my
kids. I really
feel
bad about that. That
hurts. I hope
in
the long run
it will
work
out for them and myself; I'll
be happy
with what I'm doing and I can
help
them
with
what
they're doing.-Age:
29, female, clerk, currently
attending college.
Recently divorced
and unhappy in her position
as a
clerk, she is trying to
finish
her Bachelor's
Degree at night while
working a full-time
day job.
She hopes to go
on to law school. Thus, another
injury due to the
delays that plague members of the working-class who attempt to pursue
higher education.
Several working-class respondents,
however,
are
proud
of their accom-
plishments
and are
satisfied with their current
situations:
I want
to
keep
on
working (as
an) electrician, eventually
to own some
property.
I
don't want to wear a shirt and tie
to work, not have stress on
me. I make $27 an
hour.-Age: 34,
male, electrician, some college.
This
comment suggests
that this
man is proud
of
working-class
(skilled)
labor. His union may lose members, his income may go down, and he may
lose his house,
but they
cannot take away
his
trade.
The
skilled
blue-
collar
occupation
offers
a defense
against
the hidden
injuries
of class. Some
other
working-class
respondents,
while satisfied
with
their
current
situation,
want
to
go
further
in their field.
A
few examples
of such
persons
are
a
carpenter
hoping
to become
a foreman so
he
will not have to do
heavy
lifting when he gets
older,
a truck
driver
wanting
to
become a
dispatcher,
and a
firefighter
dreaming
of
becoming
an officer
in the fire
department.
Those respondents
who
experienced
fewer hidden
injuries
of
class-either
as a child or an adult-tend to have a more optimistic outlook on the future.
The middle-class
response,
time-after-time, especially
among profes-
sionals,
is one
of contentment:
Well,
I've reached my occupational
goal;
I'm a
partner
in a
fairly good
law firm.
I
guess
I'll continue
to
practice
law and
improve
my standing
in the law
firm,
improve
my
abilities as an
attorney.-Age:
35,
male,
lawyer,
law
degree.
Well,
I
really don't, actually (have
an
occupational
or educational
goal). My
occupa-
tional
goal
had been
for
many years
to work
on the
city
desk
at the
newspaper
in
(this)
city.
The
city
desk is
the
main
newsroom;
and
having
reached
that
goal
I
haven't
set another
one.-Age:
35, male, reporter,
BA
plus graduate
courses.
Three middle-class
respondents
from
academia,
including
two
professors,
are
also
very happy
in
their field:
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:48:52 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
-
8/18/2019 Zivo Trad Nici Sad
20/26
Reconsidering
Worlds of Pain 711
(I want to be) doing
what I'm
doing right now-same thing-research,
consultation
work, working
on
meaningful
studies
and
research in the field that I
enjoy.
I'm
very content with what I'm
doing.-Age: 41, female, academic/applied research,
MA, working on Ph.D.
All these comments come in
the context of careers [see Bellah
(1985),
Bledstein (1976), Ehrenreich (1989), and
Mills
(1951), for a social
history
and
analysis
of
the
emergence
of
the middle-class
career].
The
middle-class
career provides
the
satisfaction and
opportunity
for advancement that
many
working-class jobs cannot.
It is probably safe to say that most of
the
working-class respondents
in
the sample, especially those
who
recently lost
their jobs,
would find it hard
to
believe that
relatively young people
could
say
that
they
have reached their
life
goals.
Interestingly,
those middle-class
respondents
most
content
with
their
positions
are somewhat
pessimistic
about the future
of this
country,
al-
though
not about their
children's future:
I think it's
going
to
be
very
competitive,
and I will do
anything
I
can
to make
sure
my daughters
have
a
competitive
edge
because
I
don't think
it's
going
to
be
easy.
I'd like to be
optimistic
but
I
have
grave doubts;
it's
going
to
be
a
more difficult
place
to
live
then it is
now,
and one
way
I can assure
my
children's
well-being
is
to
make sure they are well-educated
and
well-grounded
so
they
can deal with what
challenges
come
up.-Age: 35, male, lawyer,
law
degree.
This man believes that a good education will ensure his children a competi-
tive
edge;
a
belief that
will
compel
him
to
push
his children
to
get
a
college
degree.
The attitudes of the middle-class
parents
in
the
sample
are driven
by
what has been called the culture of
professionalism (Bledstein
1976)
where the
pursuit
of
higher
education and a career are
central
to increas-
ing
one's social
standing
and wealth.
A
professor
commented:
I'm
not
so
confident
about
the future
in
the
aggregate
because I think the
country
faces some hard
problems
which will
impinge
on
(my children)
whether
they
like
it or not. On the other
hand,
I
would have to
say
in
the
case
of
my kids, they're
bright kids, well-educated, good
work
habits. I think
they
have
quite bright
futures.-
Age: 47, male, college professor, Ph.D.
A
lawyer reflecting on the current economic/political situation
sounds a
more ominous note:
I am
very
concerned about
what
the future
will
be like in
America. We ar