Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

download Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

of 51

Transcript of Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    1/51

    11

    GO ... LEGALGO ... LEGAL

    AsistAsist. Univ.. Univ. drddrd LauraLaura--Rebeca PrecupRebeca Precup--StiegelbauerStiegelbauer

    [email protected]@yahoo.comTel: 0723888647Tel: 0723888647

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    2/51

    22

    A 1000 miles trip starts with theA 1000 miles trip starts with the

    first step!first step!

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    3/51

    33

    DoesDoes hehe workwork??HeHe doesdoes notnot workworkHeHe worksworks

    Do IDo I workwork??I doI do notnot workworkII dondontt workwork

    II workworkSHORTSHORTINFINITVEINFINITVE

    HE/SHE/IT +HE/SHE/IT +

    S, ESS, ES

    --somethingsomethinghappenshappens

    repeatedlyrepeatedly

    --howhow oftenoften

    somethingsomething

    happenshappens

    --oneone actionaction

    followsfollows anotheranother--thingsthings in generalin general

    --afterafterthethe

    followingfollowing verbsverbs::

    toto lovelove,, toto hatehate,, toto

    thinkthinketcetc

    --futurefuture meaningmeaning::

    TimetablesTimetables,,

    programsprograms

    everyevery dayday

    sometimessometimes

    alwaysalways

    oftenoften

    usuallyusually

    seldomseldomnevernever

    firstfirstthenthen

    PRESENTPRESENTSIMPLESIMPLE

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    interogativinterogativ

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    negativnegativ

    ExeExemplumplu lala

    afirmafirmativativ

    FORMULAFORMULAUTILIZAREUTILIZARECUVINTECUVINTE

    SPECIFICESPECIFICE

    TIMPULTIMPUL

    The Tenses

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    4/51

    44

    DidDid hehe workwork??HeHe diddid notnot workwork..HeHe didndidntt workwork..

    HeHe workedworked..

    DidDid II workwork??II diddid notnot workwork..

    II didndidntt workwork..

    II workedworked..--regularregular::

    INFINITIVEINFINITIVE

    ++ --EDED

    --irregularirregular::

    22ndnd columncolumn ofof

    table oftable of

    irregularirregular

    verbsverbs

    --actionaction tooktookplaceplace

    inin thethepastpast,, mostlymostly

    connectedconnected withwith anan

    expressionexpression ofoftimetime

    (no(no connectionconnection toto

    thethepresentpresent))

    lastlast

    agoago

    in 1990in 1990

    yesterdayyesterday

    PAST SIMPLEPAST SIMPLE

    IsIs hehe workingworking??HeHe isis notnot workingworking..

    HeHe isnisntt workingworking..HeHe isis workingworking..

    HeHess workingworking..

    Am IAm I workingworking??I amI am notnot workingworking..

    IImm notnot workingworking..

    I amI am workingworking..

    IImm workingworking..

    TO BETO BE

    (AM, ARE,(AM, ARE,

    IS) +IS) +

    INFINITIVEINFINITIVE+ ING+ ING

    --somethingsomething isis

    happeninghappening atat thethe

    samesame timetime ofof

    speakingspeaking ororaroundaround itit

    -- futurefuture meaningmeaning::

    whenwhen youyou havehave

    alreadyalready

    decideddecided andand

    arrangedarranged toto dodoitit (a(a fixedfixedplan,plan,

    date)date)

    nownow

    atat thethe momentmoment

    LookLook!!

    ListenListen!!

    PRESENTPRESENT

    CONTINUOUSCONTINUOUS

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    interogativinterogativ

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    negativnegativ

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    afirmativafirmativ

    FORMULAFORMULAUTILIZAREUTILIZARECUVINTECUVINTE

    SPECIFICESPECIFICE

    TIMPULTIMPUL

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    5/51

    55

    HasHas hehe workedworked??HeHe hashas notnot

    workedworked..

    HeHe hasnhasntt workedworked..

    HeHe hashas workedworked..

    HeHess workedworked

    HaveHave II workedworked??II havehave notnot workedworked..

    II havenhaventt workedworked

    II havehave workedworked..

    IIveve workedworked..

    HAVE/HAS +HAVE/HAS +

    PASTPAST

    PARTICIPLEPARTICIPLE

    **

    * (infinitive +* (infinitive +

    --eded) or (3) or (3rdrd

    columncolumn ofof

    table oftable of

    irregularirregular

    verbsverbs))

    --youyou saysay thatthat sthsth..

    hashas happenedhappened ororisis

    finishedfinished inin thethe

    pastpast andand itit hashas aa

    connectionconnection toto thethe

    presentpresent

    --actionaction startedstarted inin

    thethepastpast andand

    continuescontinues upup toto

    thethepresentpresent

    justjust

    yetyet

    nevernever

    everever

    alreadyalready

    soso farfar

    upup toto nownow

    sincesince

    forfor

    recentlyrecently

    PRESENTPRESENT

    PERFECTPERFECT

    SIMPLESIMPLE

    WasWas hehe workingworking??HeHe waswas notnot

    workingworking..

    HeHe wasnwasntt

    workingworking..

    HeHe waswas

    workingworking..

    WasWas II workingworking??II waswas notnot workingworking..

    II wasnwasntt workingworking..

    II waswas workingworking..WAS/WEREWAS/WERE

    ++

    INFINITIVEINFINITIVE

    ++ inging

    --anan actionaction

    happenedhappened inin thethe

    middlemiddle ofofanotheranother

    actionaction--someonesomeone waswas

    doingdoing sthsth.. atat aa

    certaincertain timetime (in(in

    thethepastpast)) -- youyou dodo

    notnot knowknow whetherwhether

    itit waswas finishedfinished oror

    notnot

    whilewhilePASTPAST

    CONTINUOUSCONTINUOUS

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    interogativinterogativ

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    negativnegativ

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    afirmativafirmativ

    FORMULAFORMULAUTILIZAREUTILIZARECUVINTECUVINTE

    SPECIFICESPECIFICE

    TIMPULTIMPUL

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    6/51

    66

    HadHad hehe workedworked??HeHe daddad notnot

    workedworked..

    HeHe hadnhadntt workedworked..

    HeHe hadhad workedworked..

    HeHedd workedworked..

    HadHad II workedworked??II hadhad notnot workedworked..

    II hadnhadntt workedworked..

    II hadhad workedworked..

    IIdd workedworked..

    HAD + PASTHAD + PAST

    PARTICIPLEPARTICIPLE

    **

    * (infinitive +* (infinitive +

    --eded) or (3) or (3rdrd

    columncolumn ofof

    table oftable of

    irregularirregularverbsverbs))

    --mostlymostly whenwhen twotwo

    actionsactions in ain a storystory

    areare relatedrelated toto eacheach

    otherother:: thethe actionaction

    whichwhich hadhad alreadyalready

    happenedhappened isisputput

    intointo PastPast Perfect,Perfect,

    thethe otherotheractionactionintointo SimpleSimple PastPast

    thethepastpast ofofthethe

    PresentPresent PerfectPerfect

    alreadyalready

    justjust

    nevernever

    PASTPAST

    PERFECTPERFECT

    HasHas hehebeenbeen workingworking??HeHe hashas notnotbeenbeen

    workingworking..

    HeHe hasnhasnttbeenbeen

    workingworking..

    HeHe hashasbeenbeen

    workingworking..

    HeHessbeenbeen

    workingworking..

    HaveHave IIbeenbeen workingworking??II havehave notnotbeenbeen

    workingworking..

    II havenhaventtbeenbeen

    workingworking..

    II havehavebeenbeen

    workingworking..

    IIvevebeenbeen

    workingworking..

    HAVE/HAS +HAVE/HAS +

    BEEN +BEEN +

    INFINITIVEINFINITIVE

    ++

    INGING

    --actionactionbeganbegan inin

    thethepastpast andand hashas

    justjust stoppedstopped

    --howhow longlong thethe

    actionaction hashasbeenbeen

    happeninghappening

    --emphasisemphasis::

    lengthlength ofof

    timetime of anof an

    actionaction

    allall dayday

    thethe wholewhole dayday

    howhow longlong sincesince

    forfor

    PRESENTPRESENT

    PERFECTPERFECT

    CONTINUOUSCONTINUOUS

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    interogativinterogativ

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    negativnegativ

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    afirmativafirmativ

    FORMULAFORMULAUTILIZAREUTILIZARECUVINTECUVINTE

    SPECIFICESPECIFICE

    TIMPULTIMPUL

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    7/51

    77

    WillWill hehe workwork??HeHe willwill notnot workwork..

    HeHe wonwontt workwork..HeHe willwill workwork..

    HeHellll workwork..

    ShallShall II workwork??II shallshall notnot workwork..II shallshall workwork..

    IIllll workwork..

    WILL/SHALWILL/SHAL

    L +L +INFINITIVEINFINITIVE

    --predictionspredictions aboutabout

    thethe futurefuture ((youyouthinkthinkthatthat sthsth.. willwill

    happenhappen))

    --youyou decidedecide toto dodo

    sthsth.. spontaneouslyspontaneously

    atat thethe timetime ofof

    speakingspeaking,, youyou

    haven'thaven't mademade aa

    decisiondecisionbeforebeforemainmain clauseclause inin

    typetype I ofI ofthethe ifif

    clausesclauses

    nextnext weekweek

    tomorrowtomorrow

    FUTUREFUTURE

    TENSETENSESIMPLESIMPLE

    HadHad hehebeenbeen workingworking??HeHe hadhad notnotbeenbeen

    workingworking..

    HeHe hadnhadnttbeenbeen

    workingworking..

    HeHe hadhadbeenbeen

    workingworking..

    HeHeddbeenbeen

    workingworking

    HadHad IIbeenbeen workingworking??II hadhad notnotbeenbeen

    workingworking..

    II hadnhadnttbeenbeen

    workingworking..

    II hadhadbeenbeen

    workingworking..

    IIddbeenbeen

    workingworking..

    HAD + BEENHAD + BEEN

    ++

    INFINITIVEINFINITIVE

    ++INGING

    --howhow longlong

    somethingsomething hadhad

    beenbeen happeninghappening

    beforebefore somethingsomethingelseelse happenedhappened

    howhow longlong

    sincesince

    forfor

    PASTPAST

    PERFECTPERFECT

    CONTINUOUSCONTINUOUS

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    interogativinterogativ

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    negativnegativ

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    afirmativafirmativ

    FORMULAFORMULAUTILIZAREUTILIZARECUVINTECUVINTE

    SPECIFICESPECIFICE

    TIMPULTIMPUL

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    8/51

    88

    WillWill hehebebe workingworking??HeHe willwill notnotbebe

    workingworking..

    HeHe wonwonttbebe

    workingworking..

    HeHe willwillbebe

    workingworking..

    HeHellllbebe

    workingworking..

    ShallShall IIbebe workingworking??II shallshall notnotbebe

    workingworking..

    II shallshallbebe

    workingworking..

    IIllllbebe workingworking..

    WILL/SHALWILL/SHAL

    L + BE +L + BE +

    INFINITVE +INFINITVE +

    inging

    AnAn actionaction willwillbebe

    ininprogressprogress atat aa

    certaincertain timetime inin thethe

    futurefuture.. ThisThis actionaction

    hashasbegunbegunbeforebefore

    thethe certaincertain timetime..

    --SomethingSomething

    happenshappensbecausebecauseitit normallynormally

    happenshappens..

    FUTUREFUTURE

    CONTINUOUSCONTINUOUS

    IsIs hehe goinggoing toto workwork??HeHe isis notnot goinggoing toto

    workwork..

    HeHess notnot goinggoing toto

    workwork..

    HeHe isis goinggoing toto

    workwork..

    HeHess goinggoing toto

    workwork..

    Am IAm I goinggoing toto workwork??I amI am notnot goinggoing toto

    workwork..

    IImm notnot goinggoing totoworkwork..

    I amI am goinggoing toto

    workwork..

    IImm goinggoing totoworkwork..

    BE (AM,BE (AM,

    ARE, IS)ARE, IS)

    + GOING TO+ GOING TO++

    INFINITIVEINFINITIVE

    --whenwhen youyou havehave

    alreadyalready decideddecided toto

    dodo sthsth. in. in thethefuturefuture

    --whatwhat youyou thinkthink

    whatwhat willwill happenhappen

    GOING TOGOING TO

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    interogativinterogativ

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    negativnegativ

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    afirmativafirmativ

    FORMULAFORMULAUTILIZAREUTILIZARECUVINTECUVINTE

    SPECIFICESPECIFICE

    TIMPULTIMPUL

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    9/51

    99

    WillWill hehe havehavebeenbeenworkingworking??HeHe willwill notnot havehavebeenbeen workingworking..

    HeHe wonwontt havehave

    beenbeen workingworking..

    HeHe willwill havehavebeenbeen workingworking..

    HeHellll havehavebeenbeen

    workingworking..

    ShallShall II havehavebeenbeen

    workingworking??II shallshall notnot havehave

    beenbeen workingworking..II shallshall havehave

    beenbeen workingworking..

    IIllll havehavebeenbeen

    workingworking..

    WILL/SHALWILL/SHAL

    L + HAVEL + HAVE

    + BEEN+ BEEN

    ++

    INFINITIVEINFINITIVE

    + ING+ ING

    --sthsth.. willwill alreadyalready

    havehave happenedhappened

    beforebefore aa certaincertain

    timetime inin thethe futurefuture

    --emphasisemphasis::

    lengthlength ofof

    timetime of anof anactionaction

    FUTUREFUTURE

    PERFECTPERFECT

    CONTINUOUSCONTINUOUS

    WillWill hehe havehave workedworked??HeHe willwill notnot havehave

    workedworked..

    HeHe wonwontt havehave

    workedworked..

    HeHe willwill havehave

    workedworked..

    HeHellll havehave

    workedworked..

    ShallShall II havehave workedworked??II shallshall havehave notnot

    workedworked..

    II shallshall havehave

    workedworked..

    IIllll

    havehave

    workedworked..

    WILL/SHALWILL/SHAL

    L + HAVE +L + HAVE +

    PASTPAST

    PARTICIPLEPARTICIPLE

    **

    * (infinitive +* (infinitive +

    --eded) or (3) or (3rdrd

    columncolumn ofof

    table oftable of

    irregularirregular

    verbsverbs))

    --sthsth.. willwill alreadyalready

    havehave happenedhappened

    beforebefore

    aa

    certaincertain

    timetime inin thethe futurefuture

    FUTUREFUTURE

    PERFECTPERFECT

    SIMPLESIMPLE

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    interogativinterogativ

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    negativnegativ

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    afirmativafirmativ

    FORMULAFORMULAUTILIZAREUTILIZARECUVINTECUVINTE

    SPECIFICESPECIFICE

    TIMPULTIMPUL

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    10/51

    1010

    WouldWould hehebebe workingworking??HeHe wouldwould notnotbebe

    workingworking..

    HeHe wouldnwouldnttbebe

    workingworking

    HeHe wouldwouldbebe

    workingworking..

    WouldWould IIbebe workingworking??II wouldwould notnotbebeworkingworking..

    II wouldnwouldnttbebe

    workingworking..

    II wouldwouldbebeworkingworking..

    WOULD +WOULD +BE +BE +

    INFINITIVEINFINITIVE

    + ING+ ING

    --sthsth.. thatthat mightmighthappenhappen

    emphasisemphasis:: lengthlength

    ofoftimetime of anof an

    actionaction

    CONDITIONACONDITIONALL

    CONTINUOUSCONTINUOUS

    WouldWould hehe workwork??HeHe wouldwould notnot

    workwork..

    HeHe wouldnwouldntt

    workwork..

    HeHe wouldwould

    workwork..

    WouldWould II workwork??II wouldwould notnot workwork..II wouldnwouldntt workwork..

    II wouldwould workwork....

    WOULD +WOULD +INFINITIVEINFINITIVE

    --sthsth.. thatthat mightmighthappenhappen

    --mainmain clauseclause inin

    typetype II ofII ofthethe ifif

    clausesclauses

    CONDITIONACONDITIONAL SIMPLEL SIMPLE

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    interogativinterogativ

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    negativnegativ

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    afirmativafirmativ

    FORMULAFORMULAUTILIZAREUTILIZARECUVINTECUVINTE

    SPECIFICESPECIFICE

    TIMPULTIMPUL

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    11/51

    1111

    WouldWould hehe havehavebeenbeen

    workingworking??

    HeHe wouldwould notnot

    havehavebeenbeen

    workingworking..

    HeHe wouldnwouldntt havehave

    beenbeen workingworking..

    HeHe wouldwould havehave

    beenbeen workingworking..

    WouldWould II havehavebeenbeen

    workingworking??

    II wouldwould notnot havehave

    beenbeen workingworking..

    II wouldnwouldntt havehave

    beenbeen workingworking..

    II wouldwould havehave

    beenbeen workingworking..

    WOULD +WOULD +

    HAVE +HAVE +

    BEEN +BEEN +

    INFINITIVEINFINITIVE

    + ING+ ING

    --sthsth.. thatthat mightmight

    havehave happenedhappened inin

    thethepastpast

    ((It'sIt's tootoo latelate nownow.).)

    emphasisemphasis:: lengthlength

    ofoftimetime of anof an

    actionaction

    CONDITIONACONDITIONA

    L PERFECTL PERFECT

    CONTINUOUSCONTINUOUS

    WouldWould II havehave workedworked??HeHe wouldwould notnot

    havehave workedworked..

    HeHe wouldnwouldntt havehave

    workedworked..

    HeHe wouldwould havehave

    workedworked

    WouldWould II havehave workedworked??

    II wouldwould notnot havehave

    workedworked..

    II wouldnwouldntt havehave

    workedworked..

    II wouldwould havehave

    workedworked..

    WOULD +WOULD +

    HAVE +HAVE +

    PASTPAST

    PARTICIPLEPARTICIPLE

    **

    *(infinitive*(infinitive ++

    --eded) or (3) or (3rdrd

    columncolumn ofof

    table oftable of

    irregularirregular

    verbsverbs))

    --sthsth.. thatthat mightmight

    havehave happenedhappened inin

    thethepastpast

    ((It'sIt's tootoo latelate nownow.).)

    --mainmain clauseclause inin

    typetype III ofIII ofthethe ifif

    clausesclauses

    CONDITIONACONDITIONA

    L PERFECTL PERFECT

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    interogativinterogativ

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    negativnegativ

    Exemplu laExemplu la

    afirmativafirmativ

    FORMULAFORMULAUTILIZAREUTILIZARECUVINTECUVINTE

    SPECIFICESPECIFICE

    TIMPULTIMPUL

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    12/51

    1212

    THE KEY OF SUCCESS IN

    SPEAKING

    SHALL/WILLSHALL/WILL

    + BE + BEING+ BE + BEING

    + VB III+ VB III

    SHALL/WILLSHALL/WILL

    + HAVE ++ HAVE +

    BEEN +BEEN +

    BEING + VBBEING + VB

    IIIIII

    AM/ARE/IS +AM/ARE/IS +

    BEING + VBBEING + VB

    IIIIII

    HAVE/HAS +HAVE/HAS +

    BEEN +BEEN +

    BEING + VBBEING + VB

    IIIIII

    WAS/WERE +WAS/WERE +

    BEING + VBBEING + VB

    IIIIII

    HAD + BEENHAD + BEEN

    + BEING ++ BEING +

    VB IIIVB III

    The Passive VoiceThe Passive VoiceContinuous AspectContinuous Aspect

    SHALL/WILL +SHALL/WILL +

    BE +VB IIIBE +VB IIISHALL/WILL +SHALL/WILL +

    HAVE + BEENHAVE + BEEN

    + VB III+ VB III

    AM/ARE/IS +AM/ARE/IS +

    VB IIIVB IIIHAVE/HAS +HAVE/HAS +

    BEEN + VB IIIBEEN + VB IIIWAS/WERE +WAS/WERE +

    VB IIIVB IIIHAD + BEEN +HAD + BEEN +

    VB IIIVB III

    The Passive VoiceThe Passive VoiceSimple AspectSimple Aspect

    SHALL/WILL +SHALL/WILL +

    BE + VB I +BE + VB I +

    INGING

    SHALL/WILL +SHALL/WILL +

    HAVE + BEENHAVE + BEEN

    + VB I +ING+ VB I +ING

    AM/ARE/IS +AM/ARE/IS +

    VB I + INGVB I + INGHAVE/HAAS +HAVE/HAAS +

    BEEN + VB I +BEEN + VB I +

    INGING

    WAS/WERE +WAS/WERE +

    VB I + INGVB I + INGHAD + BEEN +HAD + BEEN +

    VB I + INGVB I + ING

    The Continuous AspectThe Continuous Aspect

    SHALL/WILL +SHALL/WILL +

    VB IVB I

    SHALL/WILL +SHALL/WILL +

    HAVE + VB IIIHAVE + VB III

    VB I (IIIVB I (III sgsg --s,s, --

    eses))

    HAVE/HAS +HAVE/HAS +

    VB IIIVB III

    VB IIVB IIHAD + VB IIIHAD + VB III

    Future TenseFuture TenseFuture PerfectFuture PerfectPresent TensePresent TensePresentPresent

    PerfectPerfectPast TimePast TimePast PerfectPast Perfect

    The Simple AspectThe Simple Aspect

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    13/51

    1313

    A faceA faceDoneDoneDidDid

    To DoTo Do

    AA tiatiaCutCutCutCut

    To CutTo Cut

    AA costacostaCostCostCostCostTo CostTo Cost

    AA veniveniComeComeCameCame

    To ComeTo Come

    AA alegealegeChosenChosenChoseChose

    To ChooseTo Choose

    AA cumpracumpraBoughtBoughtBoughtBought

    To BuyTo Buy

    AA aduceaduceBroughtBroughtBroughtBrought

    To BringTo Bring

    AA ruperupe, a, a spargespargeBrokenBrokenBrokeBrokeTo BreakTo Break

    AAncepencepeBegunBegunBeganBegan

    To BeginTo Begin

    AA fifiBeenBeenWas / wereWas / were

    To BeTo Be

    Romanian TranslationRomanian TranslationPast ParticiplePast ParticiplePastPastInfinitiveInfinitive

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    14/51

    1414

    AA uitauitaForgottenForgottenForgotForgot

    To ForgetTo Forget

    AA zburazburaFlownFlownFlewFlew

    To FlyTo Fly

    AA gsigsiFoundFoundFoundFound

    To FindTo Find

    AA simsimiiFeltFeltFeltFelt

    To FeelTo Feel

    AA hrnihrniFedFedFedFedTo FeedTo Feed

    AA cdeacdeaFallenFallenFellFell

    To FallTo Fall

    AA mncamncaEatenEatenAteAteTo EatTo Eat

    A conduceA conduceDrivenDrivenDroveDrove

    To DriveTo Drive

    AA beabeaDrunkDrunkDrankDrank

    To DrinkTo Drink

    AA desenadesenaDrawnDrawnDrewDrew

    To DrawTo Draw

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    15/51

    1515

    AA aprindeaprindeLitLitLitLit

    To LightTo Light

    AA lsalsa, a, a prsiprsiLeftLeftLeftLeft

    To LeaveTo Leave

    AA tiitiiKnownKnownKnewKnew

    To KnowTo Know

    AA ineine, a, a pstrapstraKeptKeptKeptKept

    To KeepTo Keep

    AA rnirniHurtHurtHurtHurtTo HurtTo Hurt

    AA loviloviHitHitHitHit

    To HitTo Hit

    AA auziauziHeardHeardHeardHeardTo HearTo Hear

    AA aveaaveaHadHadhadhad

    To HaveTo Have

    AA dadaGivenGivenGaveGave

    To GiveTo Give

    AA lualuaGot, gotten (AE)Got, gotten (AE)GotGot

    To GetTo Get

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    16/51

    1616

    AA fugifugiRunRunRanRan

    To RunTo Run

    AA clriclriRiddenRiddenRodeRode

    To RideTo Ride

    AA citicitiReadReadReadRead

    To ReadTo Read

    AA punepunePutPutPutPut

    To PutTo Put

    AA pltipltiPaidPaidPaidPaidTo PayTo Pay

    AA depdepiiOvertakenOvertakenOvertookOvertook

    To OvertakeTo Overtake

    AAntlnintlniMetMetMetMet

    To MeetTo Meet

    AAnsemnansemnaMeantMeantMeantMeant

    To MeanTo Mean

    A faceA faceMadeMadeMadeMade

    To MakeTo Make

    AA pierdepierdeLostLostLostLost

    To LoseTo Lose

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    17/51

    1717

    AA stastann picioarepicioarestoodstoodStoodStood

    To StandTo Stand

    AA vorbivorbiSpokenSpokenSpokeSpoke

    To SpeakTo Speak

    AA dormidormiSleptSleptSleptSlept

    To SleepTo Sleep

    AA stastajosjosSatSatSatSat

    To sitTo sit

    A seA se scufundascufundaSunkSunkSankSank

    To SinkTo Sink

    AA cntacntaSungSungSangSang

    To SingTo Sing

    AA scuturascutura,,ShakenShakenShookShookTo ShakeTo Shake

    AA trimitetrimiteSentSentSentSent

    To SendTo Send

    AA vedeavedeaSeenSeenSawSaw

    To SeeTo See

    AA spunespuneSaidSaidSaidSaid

    To SayTo Say

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    18/51

    1818

    AA scriescrieWrittenWrittenWroteWrote

    To WriteTo Write

    AA cctigatigaWonWonWonWon

    To WinTo Win

    AA purtapurtaWornWornWoreWoreTo WearTo Wear

    A seA se trezitreziWoken upWoken upWoke upWoke up

    To Wake upTo Wake up

    AAnnelegeelegeUnderstoodUnderstoodUnderstoodUnderstood

    To UnderstandTo Understand

    AA gndigndiThoughtThoughtThoughtThought

    To ThinkTo Think

    AA spunespuneToldToldToldTold

    To TellTo Tell

    AAnvnvaa pepe cinevacinevaTaughtTaughtTaughtTaught

    To TeachTo Teach

    AA lualuaTakenTakenTookTook

    To TakeTo Take

    AAnotanotaSwumSwumSwamSwam

    To SwimTo Swim

    A (se)A (se)

    lipilipi

    StuckStuck

    StuckStuck

    To StickTo Stick

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    19/51

    1919

    99 -- ninenine

    2929twentytwenty -- ninenine9090 -- ninetyninety1919nineteennineteen88eighteight

    2828twentytwenty -- eighteight8080eightyeighty1818eighteeneighteen77sevenseven

    2727twentytwenty -- sevenseven7070seventyseventy1717 -- seventeenseventeen66sixsix

    2626twentytwenty -- sixsix6060sixtysixty1616sixteensixteen55fivefive

    2525twentytwenty -- fivefive5050fiftyfifty1515fifteenfifteen44fourfour

    2424twentytwenty -- fourfour4040 -- fortyforty1414 -- fourteenfourteen33threethree

    2323twentytwenty -- threethree3030thirtythirty1313thirteenthirteen22twotwo

    2222twentytwenty twotwo2020twentytwenty1212twelvetwelve11oneone

    2121twentytwenty oneone1010tenten1111eleveneleven00zerozero

    2121--29, ..., 9129, ..., 91--999910, 20, ...., 9010, 20, ...., 901111--191900--99Numbers

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    20/51

    2020

    100100oneone hundredhundred / a/ a hundredhundred101101oneone hundredhundred andand oneone

    325325threethree hundredhundred andand twentytwentyfivefive

    10001000oneone thousandthousand / a/ a thousandthousand

    1 5041 504oneone thousandthousand fivefive hundredhundred andand

    fourfour1 000 0001 000 000oneone millionmillion / a/ a millionmillion

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    21/51

    2121

    THE NOUN

    BearBearSheShe--bearbearHeHe--bearbear

    SpouseSpouseBrideBrideGroomGroom

    FriendFriendGirlfriendGirlfriendBoyfriendBoyfriendGrandchildGrandchildGranddaughterGranddaughterGrandsonGrandson

    FowlFowlHenHenRoosterRooster

    OxOxCowCowBullBull

    DeerDeerDoeDoeBuckBuck

    BusinesspersonBusinesspersonBusinesswomanBusinesswomanBusinessmanBusinessmanBarBar

    attendantattendant

    BarmaidBarmaid

    BarmanBarman

    PolicePolice officerofficerPolicewomanPolicewomanPolicemanPoliceman

    ComunComunFemininFemininMasculinMasculin

    Substantivul este partea de vorbire care denumete fiine, plante, lucruri, noiuni. n limbaenglez, la fel ca n limba romn, exist substantive proprii si substantive comune. In limbaenglez exist 4 genuri, spre deosebire de limba romn unde exist doar trei genuri. Existgenul masculin (denumete fiine de sex brbtesc), genul feminin (denumete fiine de sex

    feminin), genul neutru (denumete obiecte ale caror gen nu ne intereseaz) i genul comun(denumete substantive cu o singur form pentru ambele sexe).

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    22/51

    2222

    Pluralul substantivului se marcheaz adugnd terminaias.

    DARsubstativele terminate ns, -z, -sh, -ch ix primesc terminaiaes (bus-buses, fox-foxes, match-matches, etc). Dac terminaiach se pronun(k) atunci se adaug doar terminaia s. Dacy final este precedat de o

    consoan atunci se transform nie i se adaugs (baby-babies).

    Exist cteva substantive la care pluralul difer, nu merge dup nici oregul (man-men, woman-women, foot-feet, tooth-teeth, child-children,mouse-mice, sheep-sheep, game-game, goose-geese, ox-oxen, louse-

    lice, deer-deer, etc).

    a cake of soap=o bucat de spuna drop of oil=o pictur de uleia sheet of paper=o foaie de hrtiean item of news=o tirea glass/a bottle of water=u pahar/o sticl cu apa spoonful of sugar=o lingur de zahr

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    23/51

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    24/51

    2424

    THE ADJECTIVE

    thethe worstworstworseworsebadbad,, illill

    thethe bestbestbetterbettergoodgood,, wellwell

    thethe clevercleverestestclevercleverererclevercleverLUNGILUNGI

    thethe mostmost realrealmoremore realrealrealreal

    thethe mostmost incredibleincrediblemoremore incredibleincredibleincredibleincredible

    thethe mostmostpatientpatientmoremorepatientpatientpatientpatient

    thethe mostmostbeautifulbeautifulmoremorebeautifulbeautifulbeautifulbeautifulADJECTIVEADJECTIVE

    LUNGILUNGI

    thethe mostmostmoremore

    thethe thinnthinnestestthinnthinnererthinthin

    thethebiggbiggestestbiggbiggererbigbig

    thethe darkdarkestestdarkdarkererdarkdark

    thethe strangstrangesteststrangstrangererstrangestrange

    thethe lowlowestestlowlowererlowlow

    thethe coldcoldestestcoldcolderercoldcold

    thethe newnewestestnewnewerernewnew

    --estest // --iestiest--ererADJECTIVEADJECTIVE

    SCURTESCURTEADJECTADJECT

    IVEIVE

    REGULREGUL

    ATEATE

    SUPERLATIVSUPERLATIVCOMPARATICOMPARATI

    VVPOZITIVPOZITIVFELFEL

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    25/51

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    26/51

    2626

    Pronumele nehotrtEach, every = fiecare

    Each other = unul pe / spre ctre altulEverybody = toi, toat lumea

    Everything = tot, totulEveryone = toi, fiecareAll = tot, toat, toi , toate, totulOne =un, unul , una, cineva,

    Another = un altul, o alta, nc unul, nc oOne another = unul, una pe celalalt / cealaltOther = alt, alt, ali., alte

    The other =cellalt, cealalt, ceilali, celelalte

    Others =alii, alteleThe others =ceilali, celelalteBoth =amndoi, amndou

    Either =oricare dintre doi sau dou

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    27/51

    2727

    Neither =nici unu, una dintre doi sau

    douSeveral =civa, cteva

    Much =mult, multMany = muli, multe

    Little = puin, puinFew =puini, puineSome = ceva, nite, unii, unele, cteva

    Somebody = cinevaSomeone = careva, cineva

    Something = cevaAny =oricare, orice, ceva, nite, vreun,

    vreoAnybody =cineva, orice, nimeni

    Anyone = careva, oricare, nimeniAnything = ceva, orice, nimicNobody = nimeni

    No one = nici unul, nici oNothing =nimic

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    28/51

    2828

    PRACTICE MAKESPRACTICE MAKESTHE DIFFERENCETHE DIFFERENCE

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    29/51

    2929

    REPHRASING

    I. Complete the second sentence so that it has a similar meaning to the

    first sentence.

    1. The Newmans lawyer won the first lawsuit on the second of October last year.

    The .... .2. Youd better forget about going by yourself in that neighbourhood.

    You .... .

    3. Shall we all go for a walk after this trial is over?

    Why........ .

    How ... .4. I had to go to work although I wasn't feeling well.

    I had to go ..... .

    I had to go ..... .

    5. They say that the Asian criminals are not as dangerous as other criminals from around

    the world.It is ..... .

    The Asian ...

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    30/51

    3030

    6. Jasons lawsuit wasnt as long as Brians.Brian .

    7. He won the trial due to his hard work.

    Because .

    8. They had some problems while debating, so in the end they did not pass the law.If .

    9. As a consequence of his fathers murder, he could not go to work anymore.

    Since .. .

    10. Although she was a good lawyer, she lost the case.

    In spite .. .11. She missed the buss so she had to take a taxi in order to get to the police.

    If . .

    12. I enjoy going to the beach. My husband does not.

    Even ... .

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    31/51

    3131

    I. For questions 1-9 read the text and decide which

    answer (A, B, C or D) best fits each gap. There is anexample at the beginning (0).

    Example: (0) legally

    MULTIPLE CHOICE EXERCISE

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    32/51

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    33/51

    3333

    You are going to read a newspaper article.Choose the answer (A, B, C, or D) which you

    think fits best according to the text.

    READING AND COMPREHENSION

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    34/51

    3434

    Former Illinois police sergeant Drew Peterson has been married four

    times. Wife three, Kathleen Savio, died under mysteriouscircumstances in February 2004 just weeks before her divorce

    settlement with Peterson was to become final. Her dead body was

    found lying face down in an empty bathtub. Her hair was soaked in

    blood from a head wound. A Coroners Jury ruled her death an

    accident.

    But Savios family members from the beginning believed that Peterson

    was responsible for her death. It had been an abusive, violent marriagefrom the beginning. Who was responsible for the spousal abuse in the

    marriage is still a subject of considerable debate. Kathleen tried to have

    a domestic violence complaint filed against Peterson but he was never

    charged. Kathleen, however, was charged twice in 2002 with batteryand domestic battery, although she was acquitted each time. Kathleen

    reportedly told her family members that if something happened to her,

    Peterson would be responsible.

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    35/51

    3535

    But despite the unusual circumstances surrounding Kathleens death,

    there was never any serious law enforcement effort to charge Petersonwith any kind of crime associated with her death. Then in 2007

    Petersons fourth wife, Stacy, disappeared under peculiar circumstances.

    Stacys disappearance immediately drew virtual non-stop cable news

    channel coverage. Nancy Grace could barely contain herself. She rodethat news pony to death until the Caley Anthony case broke in 2008

    giving her another media pony to ride into the ground. Stacy Petersons

    disappearance also gave the Savio family an opportunity to resurrect her

    death from the grave. They pressed for an exhumation and a newautopsy. There were so many sound bites and news spins that the 24-

    hour cable news cycle could barely keep abreast of the dizzying pace of

    the coverage. There were times when the Peterson case forced a

    historical presidential campaign to take a backseat to breaking news

    about some new detail discovered in the case. Chris Matthews was not

    the only cable chatterer who felt a tingle running up his leg.

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    36/51

    3636

    The daunting media coverage in the Peterson case was not lost on Illinois politicians,

    particularly Will County states attorney James Glasgow. Within weeks of Stacysdisappearance, Glasgow joined the Illinois State Police by naming Peterson a

    suspect in what they believed was a homicide instead of a disappearance. The

    Savio family capitalized on this media-driven turn of events to secure the exhumation

    of Kathleens body for a criminal autopsy. The results of that autopsy, photographs of

    the crime scene, and police reports convinced Glasgow that Kathleen Savio had

    been murdered.

    But the county prosecutor had a problem. The physical evidence supporting the

    homicide theory was not conclusive; and all the statements by members of the Savio

    family based on what Kathleen reportedly told them and Kathleens own requests forprotective orders would be inadmissible in a court of law under traditional hearsay

    rules of evidence. But State Sen. A.J. Wilhelmi, D-Joliet, found a way around the

    hearsay rules of evidence by introducing a bill that would allow a judge to admit

    hearsay evidence in a first-degree murder case if prosecutors could prove the

    defendant killed the witness to keep him/her from testifying. The bill was enacted into

    law, even as Wilhelmi and others tried to say the law was not in response to the

    Drew Peterson case. Some Republican lawmakers disputed that claim.

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    37/51

    3737

    Glasgow finally had what he needed to secure a first degree murder indictment against Peterson in connection with

    Kathleen Savios death. Peterson was indicted on May 7, 2009 in a two-count first degree murder indictment, charging that

    he killed his former wife by forcing her to inhale fluid. Glasgow immediately rushed before the news cameras,

    announcing: In essence, what youre basically allowing the victim of a violent crime to do is testify from the grave.

    One of Petersons attorneys, Joel Brodsky, was not impressed with this new legal reasoning. He said the law had

    been passed specifically to put his client behind bars based on nothing more than rumor and innuendo and that the law

    denied a defendant of his constitutional right to confront his accusers. Theyre changing the law, changing the rules,

    changing forensic findings to get [Peterson], Brodsky told the media. The law [is] not supposed to be made for a

    particular case. []Swayed by the media fanaticism led by the likes of Nancy Grace and non-stop Just In or breaking news

    coverage on the cable news channels, the Illinois Legislature passed a Drew Peterson Law designed to usurp him of the

    essential constitutional right of confrontation because of the popular public belief that he is obviously guilty. The Illinois

    Legislature does not have the legal authority to undermine Drew Petersons established and clearly recognized right of

    confrontation guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. As with most Americans, we do not know if Drew Peterson is in fact

    guilty of killing his third wife Kathleen or whether he was criminally responsible for the disappearance of his fourth wife

    Stacy. What we do know, and what we will never relinquish to media hysteria, is our belief that Drew Peterson, like every

    individual accused of a crime, enjoys a constitutionally-protected presumption of innocence which Illinois legislators and

    state prosecutors are attempting to deny him. What we believe, and truly hope, is that the Illinois Legislature has set up a

    constitutional confrontation that will end with the U.S. Supreme Court striking down the Drew Peterson Law just as it

    struck down Dwayne Giles California murder conviction.

    Legislators and State Prosecutors Attempting to Deny

    Confrontation, Clause Guarantees, Presumption of InnocenceA Drew Peterson Defense, John Floyd and Billy Sinclair, Provided

    by John T. Floyd Law Firm By: Houston Criminal Defense

    Attorney John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair,

    Copyright Clearance 14 August 2009

    1. The text suggests that:

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    38/51

    3838

    A. Kathleen Savio died before the divorce

    B. Drew Peterson killed his wife

    C. Kathleen Savio was the sergeants second wife

    D. Kathleen Savio was still alive when the police found her body in an empty bathtube.

    2. According to the writer:

    A. Peterson was charged with domestic violence

    B. Kathleen was charged with domestic violence

    C. Kathleens family knew Peterson would kill her

    D. The subject of spousal abuse was very much debated in the media.

    3. Which of the following views does the writer express?A. Nancy Grace was Petersons third wife

    B. The Savio family exhumated Stacxys body

    C. The case of Stacy Peterson took a backseat to breaking news

    D. The Glasgow police decided Kathleen Savio had bee murdered by Chris Matthews

    4. According to the text:

    A. Due to Senator A. J. Wilhelmi, the judge admitted the hearsay evidence in a first-degree murder case.

    B. The physical evidence supportingthe homicide theory was admitted in a court of law under traditional hearsay

    rules of evidence.

    C. Peterson was not charged with a first degree murder

    D. Joel Brodsky, the attorney, claimed it had been a fair trial, despite the rumors and innuendos.

    5. In the last paragraph we learn that:

    A. Prosecutors in the Peterson case faound it very easy to prove that Peterson murdered Kathleen Savio to keep

    her from testifying against her.

    B. Kathleen Savio had requested a protective order.

    C. The Glasgow legislature passed a Drew Peterson Law designed to usurp him of the essential constitutional

    right of confrontation.D. Most Americans do not believe that Peterson is in fact guilty of killing his third wife.

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    39/51

    3939

    WRITING

    I. You have just finished Law School and you are asked by the Deanof the Faculty to write an article in the local newspaper in which

    you should promote the Law School. In the same article you should

    also underline the importance and the responsibility this school

    involves.

    Write your article in approximately 250 words.

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    40/51

    4040

    Crime categories

    A crime is an illegal act which may result in prosecution and punishment by thestate if the accused (= the person or people charged with a crime) is / areconvicted (= found guilty in a court of law). Generally, in order to be convicted ofa crime, the accused must be shown to have committed an illegal (= unlawful)act with a criminal state of mind.

    Look at the list of crimes in the box, then look at the categories below.Decide which category each one comes under, and write the crime in theappropriate space in the table. Some crimes can be listed under more thanone category. One of the words / expressions in the list is not a crime.

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    41/51

    4141

    1. abduction 2. actual bodily harm 3. aiding and abetting (= assisting) an offender 4.

    arson5. assault 6. battery 7. being equipped to steal 8. bigamy 9. blackmail

    10. breach of the Official Secrets Act 11. breaking and entering 12. bribery 13. burglary13. careless or reckless driving 14. committing a breach of the peace 15. conspiracy

    16. contempt of court 17. criminal damage (vandalism, and sometimes alsohooliganism)

    18. deception or fraud in order to obtain property, services or pecuniary advantage19. driving without a licence or insurance 20. drug dealing 21. drunk in charge / drink

    driving22. embezzlement 23. espionage 24. forgery 25. grievous bodily harm

    26. handling stolen goods 27. indecency 28. indecent assault 29. infanticide

    30. manslaughter 31. misuse of drugs 32. money laundering 33. murder 34. obscenity35. obstruction of the police 36. paedophilia 37. perjury 38. perverting the course ofjustice

    39. piracy 40. possessing something with intent to damage or destroy property41. possessing weapons 42. racial abuse 43. rape 44. robbery 45. sedition

    46. suicide 47. terrorism 48. theft 49. treason 50. unlawful assembly 51. wounding

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    42/51

    4242

    Crimes

    against theperson

    Crimes

    againstproperty

    Public

    orderoffences

    Road

    trafficoffences

    Sexualoffences

    Politicaloffences

    Offencesagainst

    justice

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    43/51

    4343

    Name the offence

    Look at these situations, then decidewhich crime has been, or is being,committed in each case.

    1. TV Newsreader: Police believe the fire was started deliberately at around 2o'clock this morning when burning paper was pushed through the letterbox.

    They are appealing for witnesses to the event.

    2. Crown Prosecutor: Tell us in your own words exactly what happened.Witness: We were in the bar when a man walked up to the victim,pointed a gun at his head and said 'You're a dead man.' Then he pulled the trigger three times

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    44/51

    4444

    3.Police constable: You were going in excess of 60, and this is a 30 zone.Man in car: I think you're mistaken, constable. I was well within the speedlimit.

    4. Woman: When I got home, I discovered that my back door had been

    broken open.Police officer: Had anything been stolen? Woman: Yes, my new laptop,200 in cash and my pet parrot.

    5. Police officer: I'm sorry sir, but I have to report your actions to theproper authorities. Man: Look, officer, here's 50. Let's just pretend thisdidn't happen, eh?

    6. Interviewing detective: All right, Dagsy. We know you didn't dothe Cornmarket Street bank job yourself, but we know that you

    were involved somehow.Police suspect: I was just driving the carMr Regan, honest. And I didn't know what the others were up tountil they came back with bags of cash.

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    45/51

    4545

    Criminal procedureWhen the accused knows that he isgoing to stand trial, he asks a solicitorto prepare his case.

    The information collected is thengiven to a barrister who willdefend him in court.

    In a criminal case, the police willhave their own barrister, who isknown as the CrownProsecutor.

    These two barristers are referred to

    throughout the trial as counsel for thedefence and counselfor the prosecution.

    Before the trial begins, the counselsreview their evidence and decide howto present their case.

    Members of the jury, when required, areselected and briefed on their duties. Adate for the trialis arranged.

    At the beginning of the trial, the judgeasks the defendant how he pleads:'guilty' or 'not guilty'

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    46/51

    4646

    Both counsels then address the jury with a

    summary of what they believe is true, andexplain what the jury will hear at the trial.

    The counsel for the prosecution then callsand questions witnesses. The counsel forthe defence can cross-examine thesepeople. The defendant will also be

    questioned by both counsels.

    At the end of the trial, the counselssummarise the facts as they seethem, and the jury then

    retires to deliberate in private.

    When the jury has reached its verdict, it

    returns to the court and the foreman of thejury delivers the verdict to the court.

    If the defendant is found tobe 'not guilty', he isacquitted.

    However, if the jury's verdict is 'guilty',the defendant is convicted andsentenced by the judge.

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    47/51

    4747

    The defendant may have to serve a custodial sentence (in otherwords go to prison), he may be

    given a suspended sentence, or he may be fined (or acombination of two of these).

    If the defendant is not happy with the decision of the court, he is

    free to appeal to a highercourt. The highest courts for appellants in England and Wales arethe House of Lords and the

    Court of Justice of the European Communities (also called theEuropean Court of Justice, or ECJ

    for short).

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    48/51

    4848

    1. By the operation of the law.2. Caught in the act of committing acrime.3. On the face of it, or as things seem atfirst.4. A gift (usually money) with noobligations attached.

    5. Starting again.6. On its own, or all alone.7. The right to be heard in a court.8. Among / In addition to other things.9. A legal action or application pursued byone party only.10. After the event.11. Equally, or with no distinction.

    12. An act, such as murder, which is acrime in itself.13. When a threat is implied in a contract,and as a result the contract is invalid.14. A legal remedy against wrongfulimprisonment.15. Taken as a matter of fact, eventhough the legal status may not be

    certain.16. For a short time.17. Legal action against a person (forexample, one party in a case claims thatthe other should do some act or paydamages).18. By this fact, or the fact itself showsthis to be true.

    19. Acting in place of a parent.20. A matter on which a judgement hasbeen iven.

    Latin words and expressions are still relatively common in the legal profession. Howmany of the meanings on the left can you match with the expressions on the right?

    abinitio

    actusreusadlitem

    bonafide(s)

    bonavacantia

    consensusad idem

    corpusdelicti

    defacto

    dejure

    denovodoli

    capax

    doliincapax

    ex

    gratia

    exparte

    ex post facto

    21. A decision correctly made by a court, whichcan be used as a precedent

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    49/51

    4949

    habeascorp

    us

    in flagrantedelicto

    in locoparentis

    in personam inrem

    interalia

    in terrorem

    ipsofacto

    ipsojure

    locus

    standi

    malain

    se

    malaprohibita

    mensrea

    non compos mentis

    onusprobandi

    paripass

    u

    percuriam

    per se

    primafacie

    protempore

    quid pro

    quo

    resjudicata

    uberrimae

    fidei

    ultravires

    can be used as a precedent.

    22. Capable of committing a crime.

    23. The duty to prove that what has been allegedin court is true.

    24. In total good faith, a state which should existbetween parties to some types of legalrelationship.

    25. A real agreement to a contract by bothparties.

    26. A situation where the legal title is clear.27. Referring to the case at law.28. Mad, or not completely sane.29. With no owner, or no obvious owner.

    30. The mental state required to be guilty ofcommitting a crime.31. An action done in return for something done

    or promised.32. From the beginning.33. Legal action against a thing (for example, one

    party claims property or goods in thepossession of another).

    34. An act forbidden by criminal law.35. Not capable of committing a crime.36. The real proof that a crime has been

    committed.37. An act which is not a crime, but is forbidden.38. In good faith.

    39. Acting in a way which exceeds your legalpowers.

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    50/51

    5050

    For the exam:From the book GOLEGAL

    1. Exercise 1 page 42. Exercise 2 page 5

    3. Exercise 4 pag 6

    4. Exercise 1 page 19

    5. Exercise 1 page 24

    6. Exercise 1page 31

    7. Exercise 2 page 34

    8. Exercise 3 page 379. Exercise 1, 2, 3 page 68

  • 7/28/2019 Stiinte Juridice an II ID Engleza

    51/51

    5151

    THANK YOU VERYTHANK YOU VERYTHANK YOU VERYTHANK YOU VERYMUCH FOR YOURMUCH FOR YOURMUCH FOR YOURMUCH FOR YOUR

    ATTENTIONATTENTIONATTENTIONATTENTION